
Get every episode summarized
Each time Future Commerce publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
The in-house research team has hollowed out, and the LLMs picking up the slack are only delivering their best guesses. Merciv, the agentic brain behind Future Commerce’s Signal Reports, has set out to deliver auditable, defensible, and unified reporting solutions — and it’s redefining what brands are capable of achieving in-house in the process.
Phillip and Alicia welcome Merciv co-founder and CEO Shaia Erlbaum to the show to talk about how brands can read signals in real time, and verify their relevancy. Shaia argues that data itself is commoditizing, but verification is not. The most honest consumer signal lives too deep for surveys to reach, which is why our Signal Reports are looking deeper than stated behaviors and are telling completely new kinds of retail and culture stories.
The Toothpaste Doesn't Lie
Key takeaways:
- Insights teams keep shrinking while the C-suite depends on them more than ever.
- Surveys capture posturing. Forums, reviews, and comment sections capture behavior.
- Data is commoditizing. Proprietary brand knowledge is the durable moat.
- The first Signal Report, a collaboration between Future Commerce and Merciv, maps where GLP-1s removed cultural friction – and where friction migrated to.
- "Almost everyone answering a survey question about how many times they brush their teeth in a day will say twice. But if you actually look at those sales figures, they simply don't sell enough toothpaste." — Shaia Erlbaum
- "These models aren't built to tell you, 'Hey, I don't know.'" — Shaia Erlbaum
- "There's a world where data's already becoming a commodity… a lot of the real advantage is less rooted in which model's more intelligent, but more so in to what degree can we actually verify the information we're coming across." — Shaia Erlbaum
- "The office of the CMO is becoming more of an individual contributor role." — Phillip Jackson
In-Show Mentions:
- Merciv: merciv.com
- "Frictionless Wellness: GLP-1s and What Comes After the Age of Autonomy" – the first Future Commerce Signal Report, powered by Merciv.
- LORE, our newest book on who really writes your brand's story. Get it in the Future Commerce shop.
Associated Links:
- Read the first Signal Report, Frictionless Wellness: GLP-1s and What Comes After the Age of Autonomy
- Insiders 204: The Ozempic Effect: How GLP-1s Rewrote the Gospel of Self-Love
- Episode 435: Predictions 2026: Prepare for the Age of Autonomy
- Episode 367: AI Agents Are Here. "Brands" Might Be In Danger.
- Episode 447: The Agent Has Left the Building
- Check out Future Commerce on YouTube
- Check out Future Commerce Plus for exclusive content and save on merch and print
- Subscribe to Insiders and The Senses to read more about what we are witnessing in the commerce world
- Listen to our other episodes of Future Commerce
Have any questions or comments about the show? Let us know on futurecommerce.com, or reach out to us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. We love hearing from our listeners!
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Future Commerce publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
227 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Future Commerce — Separating Real Signals from the Noise. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Hello and welcome to Future Commerce, the podcast at the intersection of culture and commerce on Philip and I'm Alicia and today we are going to get into one of my favorite topics of conversation, which is research insight foresight and how really how we do that in the age of AI and I think that one of the challenges around businesses trying to get better insight and foresight is that a lot of those teams have been hollowed out that you used to have that insight in house right, Alicia, like you had teams that focused just on that and post pandemic, the biggest brands in the world, the brands who supposedly set the tone for culture in the world, they don't have those teams in house anymore and they look to agencies to look ahead for them. But in the age of AI, I find that most people are turning to tools and specifically LLMs to try to get that job done for them and I've heard a lot of conversation a lot of people talking a lot of balihoo if you will about vertical sass, especially in the last year, about specific purpose built tools that accomplish specific types of jobs and those that are native to the industry. I know we talked a lot about this Alicia back during manifest around the world.
Vertical sass taking over and supply chain industry. So it was really interesting to me when we met our newest partner who has a real hold on how you accomplish insight research competitive intelligence, but not only looking out into the world and figuring out what is happening and keeping your ear to the ground and sort of this internet fire host sense, but also tapping into the data and the insight you have to do. The data and the insight you might have in your own first party data and second party data and I just think that that's such an important part of the puzzle and part of the equation, but it's even more important when that piece of software accomplishes something that's native to commerce. And so I'm really excited to get into that and we just used this particular tool for our own means in our own research, Alicia, and I can't wait to talk about that today too. I know and still using the tool mind you and learning so much in the process about what is truly possible with tools like these because we have our own hypotheses, our own ideas of where certain trends are progressing towards and what are the tools that are going to be used.
So we have a lot of interesting tools and we have our own algorithm that's feeding us information around these trends, but there is a whole universe out there that is completely untapped that is really being uncovered for us and it's been incredible. And so today we will be talking about how we're connecting those signals if you will into intelligence and in no better person to talk about it than the builder of this platform. He is Merciv's co-founder and chief executive officer and he's helping lead the company's charge in agentic systems and something that he describes as the nervous system of global commerce, which I want to get more into. And that's where research happens can continuously and seamlessly to describe these consumer behavior shifts in real time. I would like to welcome our newest partner, Merciv's co-founder, Shaya Earlbaum. Welcome to the show, Shaya. Thank you, Philip and Alicia. It is great to be on. I appreciate you bringing me on here.
Just real quick, because I think people hear a lot about new platforms, what do they do? How does a platform like Merciv actually help people in the commerce space solve real world problems every day? Yeah, great question. And rather than boiling the ocean, I guess I'll try to focus that in on a few kind of concrete areas. We started a lot of our efforts in the domain of knowledge management. How can we actually bring a lot of the existing knowledge and the expertise that brands have already built on decades and decades of research into one fold rather than a dozen different searches and help desk kind of fragmented research in different directions? And from there, a lot, as you mentioned, the effort looking at LLMs and how we can start integrating more advanced technologies on top of our research stacks, a lot of that effort then turned into, well, if you can expose all of that knowledge to the right agent and the right tool, how can you actually get two quicker answers and better answers with the resources that are available?
And then take that a step further. I know this is some of the area that you were poking around in with the reporting you're doing and research you're doing. How can we actually expose new data sets to the existing knowledge we have? What might come from that kind of correlation, those new relationships and new insights? And the kind of data that retailers or brands, brand of manufacturers might have is everything from like inventory, right, to competitive intel or the kinds of insights that you might be asking like plain language questions, right? Like what do I do this coming shopping season? That's something that we'll be working on by the way in the next few weeks as we work together on a new piece of research. What are those types of things that your customers are doing with Merciv today? Yeah, great question. I think oftentimes we'll see teams start with kind of the question you just described. Like, you know, as simple as what do we know about X? That's the kind of question that would have taken weeks and weeks in historical paradigms.
You're looking to an insights team to find the right information. You might have to go out to vendors just to scrape through the corpus you've built. And that's often where our partners will start within the platform. You know, once you've got all of your data connected, how can we get to a quick answer as to the entire knowledge base we might have on a certain topic from there, a lot of it turns to automation. How can we actually speed up the process to anything from our monthly business review to a new research pipeline, a new typing tool for a segmentation study or to a new category review that we might be running across the syndicated sets we've acquired. And I think that's often where where teams see a lot of that early value from there, it starts squintering out in a lot of new directions. You know, a lot of the markets starting to talk and think about synthetic twins and digital twins for consumers and how you can fuel those with the data you might have your hands on. You know, there are all forms of new correlations that might surface as well as you start looking at the historical corpus paired with that real time lens.
What does a consumer do and say on Instagram or TikTok that might agree or disagree with the research you've already conducted and what new insight might inform strategy across the board. Tell me if this sounds familiar. Suddenly complaints about a package design start appearing in your reviews or maybe a conversation about your brand takes off on TikTok. Maybe the call center starts hearing the same objection over and over and over again each one of those data points individually might be some sort of signal or they could be noise. But when you put them all together, they might be telling you something really important. The problem is is that each one of those individual signals could be scattered across dozens of different tools and teams and data sets and none of them talk to each other. And that's why if you sell to consumers, you know the feeling the signal must be out there and it's time that somebody finally connects all the dots into something that you can tune into. Well, it exists and it's called immersive and it connects all of those sources and it does the analysis for you.
So instead of giving you one more dashboard for you to interpret, probably not even look at, you can ask an actual question and get a real honest answer. So a packaging complete here, a sentiment shift there, maybe some new consumer behavior that's emerging across many channels. All of those things are quantified and sourced and connected and available in minutes, not weeks. You don't have to rely on an outside agency. No, this is a tool that you have access to all day every day. The advantage now isn't having more data that you're not doing anything with. It's understanding what your consumers are telling you while there's still time to do something about it. It's called immersive and it helps you separate the signal from the noise. Go check them out today at immersive.com. That's emirciv.com. Mersev is consumer intelligence for brands that need to answer is not another dashboard. M-E-R-C-I-V.com. That's immersive. M-E-R-C-I-V.com. This is the question, right? Because there's a lot of social listening tools that exist, right?
You've got a lot of paid media where your customers are speaking back to you, probably in comments that nobody's actually paying any attention to whatsoever. You've got this influx of CX data that you're probably sitting on mountains of that you're doing nothing with at any given time. Then you have internal knowledge management that you're probably only leveraging in so much as your star employees putting that to work in their own specific roles but not sharing it in amongst the rest of the business. I think that what we're trying to do is you have to try to weave it all together. When we're sitting on mountains of all of this type of consumer data, you... It doesn't... It's no wonder why you've got brands struggling to actually understand what consumers want now or what they want next. I think when I'm asking the question, what are they doing? Are there specific case study type things that you've seen so far with immersive that are real world problems that they've solved?
So far what I've seen with immersive is you ask a simple question and the next thing I know I'm seeing after a great deal of research, a tremendous amount of reporting, tremendous amount of dashboards being built, tremendous amount of updates that can turn into a weekly, daily, monthly workflow for me. How does that actually translate into business value concretely for some of your key case studies? Yeah, absolutely. I think the beauty here is that with these new emerging technologies, there really is such a broad landscape of new opportunity. And I think when you look, you know, kind of zoom in on individual use cases and kind of the outcomes therein, a lot of them take different shape. You know, we have some brands and for example the QSR space that are looking at menu designs and looking at, you know, new formulations of flavors and a lot of that research historically was a common kind of concept testing pipeline.
You come up with a new idea, you maybe go test that with dozens or hundreds or thousands of consumers and you get a bunch of quantitative data, maybe a little bit of qual and that informs decisions. One of our customers has run 3000 different menu formulations over the last decade or so. One thing we found was they'd never actually been able to correlate the outcomes of those concept tests with their actual sales data. And that was a really interesting one. You know, you have these validated research insights and you know, at least in a survey what a consumer is telling you. And yet they hadn't kind of pulled everything together in order to correlate that with what are the real outcomes in market. And from there, that's actually a fairly simple solution when it comes to agentical analysis. You can look at really large volumes and really, you know, correlate the outcomes pretty seamlessly. But what that really informs is now how can we look forward at the next concept we might test? How can we actually predict what consumers might be looking for without having to go and conduct as many different alternative research studies in order to reach that same conclusion?
And then briefly, you know, in other senses, you've got huge corpus of data sitting online, you know, across socials and review platforms. I'll give one other brief example in the apparel space where we'll see brands really zoom in on the survey data they've got, the market research they might acquire. And they'll look at reviews. I think reviews are very meaningful. But what's often missed when you're kind of looking at a 40,000-foot view is the niche detail that consumers might mention, not necessarily on reviews for your products, but maybe on competitors. And one example there was a leggings brand that identified a huge gap in their own product lineup where every single, not every single, exaggerating a little bit, but a huge volume of reviews left on competitor leggings were praising this little zipper pocket that existed in their, in their legging brand. And the brand in question on our end actually didn't use that feature. They didn't have that feature in their lineup. And that was a really simple example of something that was costing them part of their market share.
And, you know, it was a fairly simple solution. Actually, since then, they've launched another variant of one of their key legging lines that includes a zipper. And that was a fun little success story and that it's helping them win back market that they hadn't necessarily recognized was lost to that specific feature in question. I love that example because it shows what an impact even a small detail can have in decision making, whether it's product like in that last example or whether it's marketing or creative. And like what I have found to be equally interesting, but also frustrating about doing research over over the course of, you know, my years in this industry is that there is always, and you kind of refer to this, this say do gap, right? Like consumers may say one thing, especially through social media and common sections reviews, but ultimately they may do something completely different. And it may feel almost contradictory to the things that they're, they're saying a brand should be doing or things they say a brand is missing, right?
So, where do you see those contradictions kind of come up? Yeah, there are so many examples. And I think, you know, a lot of the industry is at this point really well aware of this say do gap and just the ramifications of it in their strategy. I think I heard an interesting example recently if you look at, for example, a Colgate study, almost everyone answering a survey question about how many times they brush their teeth in a day will say twice. Liars, look at those sales figures. They simply don't sell enough toothpaste. And I think that goes to your point, Alicia, about the correlations, you know, they're really, if you don't look at those two data sets in in unison, if you aren't able to actually correlate them and understand where that translates from a from a dollar figure perspective, you'll miss the mark, you know, you'll forecast an inventory line that actually demands that kind of truth-paced value. And then it'll just sit on shelves. And I think we actually see that all over the place. You know, I mean, that's one kind of funny example, but I think underlying a lot of that distinction is consumers where they feel pressure to answer something in a survey may not come at it with full honesty.
And that's fair. And that's kind of taken as a given in some of the research world, but there is another source where they're brutally honest. That often happens in forums online or in, you know, Instagram comments or in a TikTok video. And if those signals can't be synthesized at the same time, I think a lot of the do just ends up missing from the overall strategy. Yeah. A really interesting example that we've had to kind of contend with is the signal report that we're working on right this moment on celebrity brands. And what I found really interesting is that say do gap almost appears to be derived from consumers like posturing around celebrity brands, right? They may say like, oh, like they're only getting these deals because they're famous. And oh, they don't know anything about, you know, the wellness industry or the beauty industry. But we found like we couldn't just put that data up front and let people take that at face value because when we dug a little bit deeper into the revenue, the new brand entries, the time to market cycles.
People are buying these things, right? So we had to really unpack that nuance and understand that there was a specific tipping point from where, you know, people were possibly skeptical or pushing against the idea of a celebrity brand or feeling like there's simply too many to that trigger point where they were actually more willing to try it, even though they felt a certain way about it. So again, it's just another case where, you know, sometimes we can only take what people say at face value, especially if they're participating in a survey that's quote unquote geared towards understanding true sentiment of celebrity brands. They may feel like they have to go to the table and, you know, posture or present this facade of what they're feeling that maybe they don't actually feel that way, ultimately. Yeah, absolutely. That happens to be a great example. You know, we've seen a lot of the market, even like shift its perception when it comes to celebrity brands as a whole. And it's funny also when you see surveys that might actually disagree with each other, you know, I've seen some at consumers actually claiming they don't care whether, you know, a celebrity endorses a brand or not.
Others where they say that might be one of their top purchase decisions in certain, you know, domains or certain regards. And I think really in my mind what that goes back to is the value in unifying brand knowledge and not just saying, OK, I know there's this one research file and we might dig into it or this one survey that informs a piece of picture, but actually bringing everything together and being able to search across all of it. I think that's the value that insights teams have played for a long time, but to your point earlier in the conversation, Philip, a lot of the utilization of insights as a function is starting to shift. You know, teams are actually getting a little smaller, but they're the the the C suite, the board within a lot of these companies are starting to depend on them that much more. And I think, you know, the way they can navigate whether it's say do or any of the other challenges they're running into is really leading into any opportunity to bring all of their existing knowledge, the expertise they've built over the years and years of research into that same fold to inform the questions that matter most.
I keep thinking Alicia, we we heard this. It was this conversation that I was having with someone else, but it was repeated on Twitter and I think a very similar fashion, they said that the CMO is steadily if you if you trace like its progression and take it to its logical and like this, the office of the CMO is becoming more of an individual contributor role. And that's like just the like where things are heading, especially in the age of autonomy, like we have more things that are more automated, we have more tools that accomplish more dashboards tell you where to put budgets, more things are being taken out of house. And I think that if I'm somebody who's sitting in the marketing or the brand seat, I'm thinking to myself, like, how do I, how do I start to take more control and get more insight and more foresight for myself. And that's where I feel like there's a there is a conversation, you know, it's like how much of how much of this.
We've been drowning in dashboards forever. How much of this is actually helping inform right decision making within the business rather than giving us more insight into more data. And so I think that that's where I'm asking is a lot of people are using AI tools right now. Companies have lots of AI budget and they're using lots of AI powered tools. And they think they're probably using intelligence tools to probably just chatting in LLM's right now. And so does the competitive advantage Shia come from asking better questions and being more adept at working with LLM's in general and being more informed on how to get coax more out of the tool necessary like being better with the platforms and becoming more native to the platforms. Or is that is that part of the equation or because we can ask better questions for sure. Or is it acting faster and becoming more reactive to cultural shifts and cultural currents because if I'm a CMO, I'm thinking of probably got a walk in Chugam. I got to do both.
But I'm starting to feel more and more like it's my job to do both and not necessarily a team's job to act on both. And I'm just curious what you are seeing and how folks are using your platform to maybe accomplish some of these challenges right. Yeah, absolutely. And I think each point you mentioned actually plays a role there. You know, it's the speed. It's the amount of data you might have your hands on. It's how quickly you can get to that insight. And I think a lot of the market is thinking about that metric. Like what is time to insight and how can we improve that across the board. I think there's something else here though because at the end of the day, this may not be the best framing for it. But there's a world where data is already becoming a commodity. You know, I think everyone has access to the same syndicated data sets. Every advanced frontier LLAM is getting hyper intelligent. And I think a lot of the real kind of advantage, as you mentioned, is less so rooted in which model is more intelligent.
But maybe more so in like how much to what degree can we actually verify the information that we're coming across. You know, any great LLAM can take a clean data file and give you a really confident, really good answer. But what happens when it doesn't have that full answer? It'll probably just tell you confidently something, whether it's a hallucination or something rooted in the data set it had. But if it doesn't have context across the board, these models aren't built to tell you, hey, I don't know. And I think being able to really get to that level of granularity, understand, of course, with the speed that the market's moving, how to do so quickly. But taking that a step further and having it flagged, you know, we may not have research on this topic. And maybe that's an opportunity to go commission something new or to run research yourself. Another alternative there might be pointing a lot of that lens at consumer behavior that's publicly available.
You know, the data is there. The question is more so, how can we kind of parse through it more quickly? And how can we validate that the findings we identify are real true and actually should impact the strategies we deploy? Yeah. I'm curious to like you're thinking about the like which strategies to deploy. There's so many things to how do you use immersive within your business? Do you do you do dog food it? Oh, absolutely. Yeah, I'm curious, you know, I'm sure you're doing market research and intelligence all the time. How does that work for you? And I would like to then maybe talk a little bit about how we utilized it for our first signal report together. Because I think that that kind of puts a little bit more skin on this, you know. Absolutely. Yeah, we, I like that you mentioned dog food. We actually have a slack channel we call our, we call dog food. I love that. We use the platform for everything.
I mean, by the way, it's not just market research, you know, we use it for our own workflows internally. We just had a really large RFP. We were working through every single asset that informed that proposal was stored in immersive knowledge base. We were able to run pricing through the platform. We were able to run our actual, you know, proposal preparation is a final, you know, predefined PowerPoint that we actually shared through as well. And I think, you know, that stuff is the basics because it just helped us get there quicker. But I think where, where the real value at least shows itself for us is having the tools to on the fly, just pull in any, any amount of data that we might need to get our hands on just yesterday actually. And this was for a customer, but it was just like a fun little internal project. We ended up pulling about six million reviews, a historical content, a corpus, I guess, call it, of all reviews in a certain category for a large electronics manufacturer.
And being able to do that over the course of maybe an hour or two, rather than forming a contract and, you know, buying that data from some incumbent provider, it's just a lot of fun, frankly, you know, we can in an hour, not just pull that data in, but now understand deeply. And, you know, whether it's a 2D or 3D visualization of a knowledge graph and how these different pieces connect with each other, or a report that we might just be generating for our own knowledge. I think those often are the areas where we just get to play around and have a lot of fun. And of course, that ends up impacting our customer. The way we learn is both through our own experimentation, but also through observing the ways you need customers utilize our platform. And that, to me, as a founder, is a magical moment. You know, you have most of the time, we have a really concrete use case. You know, exactly how you're going to use our tool, and we're going to educate you on how to do so.
I think that's how the SaaS industry has run for quite some time. I think the beauty in this new age of deploying agents and providing such a malleable kind of interface is getting to observe new features or new uses of our platform that I may have never even considered. And that, to me, has been one of the most fulfilling moments, I'd say, in just getting to talk to people using the tool, both in-house and in customer organizations, just watching those new workflows unfold. I'd also lay in one other point there, which is not to get too deep into the weeds around specific features, but one thing we've spent a lot of our time on recently as a feature we call playbooks, which can essentially take weeks long, more arduous repetitive workflow, and teach it to a set of agents that can carry that out, dependably in the same exact manner, almost deterministically over time. And that's, frankly, just saving a lot of my own time. We've got playbooks for almost everything now, and we're rolling more and more of them out for customers, but being able to just click a button, maybe fill out a few form fields to give the right information or point the agents in the right direction.
And even 30 minutes later, get an email with the output, whether that's a new Excel workbooks or something we're working on on the pricing side, or anything from documentation to new market research as we were discussed earlier, I think those are the areas where I'm just getting excited about not just the time we can save, but really like the new learning that I can do every day, anything from wellness to celebrity reports and a lot of the internal research we've done as well. But if there are any operations or fulfillment at a growing brand, you already know this to be true. The customer just does not care where the marketing department ends its journey and the operations team takes over because if the order arrives late or maybe tracking is not updating or the unboxing experience does not live up to their expectations that is a brand level problem. And ship fusion wanted to give operators a better way to understand how their fulfillment experience actually compares to the rest of the market.
So they placed an audited hundreds of actual real life DTC orders and they looked at everything from checkout and shipping to delivery and unboxing, and then they turned all of that research into the DTC fulfillment experience quiz. It's 16 questions, it takes five minutes, and it gives you a benchmark for where your operation is strong and where there's a gap for the customer experience that's breaking down for you right now. And let's say that fulfillment is becoming a constraint on your growth. Ship fusion is giving future commerce listeners three months of free fulfillment when you partner with them. I can't think of a better way of getting started on BFCM than doing that right now. So start your journey by bending your operation at ship fusion.com slash future commerce that's ship fusion.com slash future commerce take the DTC fulfillment experience quiz 16 questions, five minutes, get a benchmark for where you are and get three months of free fulfillment when you partner with them, but you got to use our link ship fusion.com slash future commerce.
And we have to I so I think that's where we were really taken a back is you know in the onboarding. I was sort of wizard experience you know we go through this sort of like classification ask you a lot about your business and it defines a lot of like market comps and goes and finds a little bit about your competitors and who you are it knew I was surprised right not something that's built necessarily for media, although we are in the commerce industry. And Merciv was able to pull a tremendous amount of information about us what what the world of you media says about us what our audience says about us. And from that when we started to build out a bunch of our own insights and research for our partnership it it it was building it all with our audience in mind so it was building it all towards the end of who is our ultimate consumer of that content and research right and for our own information when we're needing to be informed so that we can inform others so that we can make accurate predictions and and
accurate forecasts about where things could go in the future it's one thing for us to just I think a lot of people are doing this now you just tell me tell me chat GPT right you just tell it what to it's telling you what to think now this is not that it's more about us synthesizing what's happening in the world we have to understand that and then we we need to put that into a format that we believe is valuable for our readers time right and that's what we're exchanging for we set out to build this for us. So we need to understand the current state of branded search movement around GLP ones in the coming the coming wave of GLP 3s and we started out with this wellness category very broad wellness category thesis about longevity and supplements and this whole industry really just becoming much more of a larger consumer category expanding from CPG into into a pharma and then you know people are are having peptide parties at home like how do we narrow in into which by the way it was like how do we go in five years to like from
leggings and Lula Roe to peptide parties I don't know we live in wacky times that's those are the new MLMs and but this is this where we are and so how do we narrow in on what is an interesting and data rich piece of insight for us to extract and this is where we wound up is that there is a wealth of information and a tremendous amount of like competitive keyword analysis that we were able to pull out there's a lot of really interesting data around competition around like peptides as keywords versus brand of keywords like wagovie or a zempic and so when we started actually digging into what Merce was bringing back not just in wellness broadly but specifically around the current state of GLP ones versus what's coming with GLP 3s like we we said okay that's that's the piece of research is that we can start to look at what what has happened how does that differ from what we thought was happening and then where do we think it's going in the next 18 to 24 months and that's what our newest signal report is about and that's what I think a signal report should be about is separating signal from noise and then allowing us to project that into the future
Alicia can you like actually give us a little bit more about what this current state of research is as the primary author of this piece. Yeah absolutely I think you hit on our overarching goals really well I think the other component though that is really important to call out that Merce helped us you know validate cross validate challenge even in some instances is you know how the markets were progressing you know from a manufacturing standpoint from a services standpoint versus what was the culture saying and doing meaning the end user the consumer and you know what were they saying what were their perceptions of you know GLP one usage what what terms were they using was sentiment positive or negative which communities were gathering and how were they talking about you know these these different you know services and and the like so that was an extra layer in the exercise that I found especially valuable you know with
mainly a retail background because we went into this process where all of the headlines that I was seeing was about how GLP ones were impacting returns and I'm like okay yeah noted that makes sense and you know actually since this repress come out we've seen an acceleration and expansion of headlines around the implications for retail but you know I wanted to understand the other adjacencies you know how is consumer is consumer behavior meaning you know if they're taking GLP ones how is that trickling down into product innovation and other categories how is that impacting how they interpret personal style how they decide to show up and what we were able to unlock is that you know GLP ones are activating so many new categories for growth and expansion shy to to an earlier point that you made you know in menu menu creation for quick serve and new specialized product lines for grocery and CPG but it's also creating so many new extensions for services in in skincare and body care even hair care like there are completely new lines and during the market now because of that ripple effect that we were really trying to call out and we even have direct
quotes from executives from Ulta that are really pinpointing that you know we're seeing the market do X and that's an opportunity for us so we're really we're really going to double down in product innovation and finding the right partners to fill our shelves to make sure that the GLP one consumer in this case is fully represented and for a long time we weren't able to put a number on that but Merce has really helped us find those numbers and validate those numbers which has been incredibly exciting. I think there's a many times where you're looking into a research and analysis tool where you get a number of dashboards or a giant data set or you have an LLM which gives you a bunch of not useful essay style pros. And what instead we found in our usage here and sounds like I'm glazing honestly I just like finally found a tool that was useful for us but what I found instead was something that allowed us to sort of just like drill down into the things that we thought mattered and organized that information in ways that we felt we're able to separate signal from noise which was the purpose around signal report.
Love for people to go get that we're going to have three of these at least between now in the end of the year future commerce commerce slash signal and that's where you can get the first one GLP one report right now is available. We have another one on celebrity brands as Alicia already mentioned coming very soon and again thanks to Merce for partnering with us to help enable access to these vast data sets through the partnership through access to the platform. Anything Shia I'd love to get you in on this to I'd love to understand you know these are wildly different approaches to data it's an I think in particular what we're trying to demonstrate in these reports is that the content of the report I think is not the important piece it's that we can dig up insight and foresight using it and if that's useful for our business and in these particular market verticals it must be. Useful for others to would love for you to give me your perspective at least maybe on this report and what you think might be coming next.
Yeah absolutely and I think you know the markets pretty aware at this point of the effects that GLP ones have had as a whole I think what's been interesting for us to observe is even our customers in like the. Alcohol beverage space are really meaning into these trends and doing a lot of similar research internally you know I think it's been interesting to find the the shifting taste preferences for example and a brand we work with in the beer and beverage space is actually exploring GLP one friendly beer formulations to adapt to those shifting preferences and so I think this research is incredibly topical. I think there's also an interesting parallel just to how the rate of research is shifting over time I think an example I was looking at recently with Botox actually I believe I have the dates right I'm pretty sure Botox was originally approved to treat like I muscle issues in the late 80s I think it was 1989 or something along those lines and then years later I think it was like early 90s maybe 92 93.
Someone realized that you know it also smooths out our wrinkles and our you know frown lines or whatever it might be and then it wasn't until early 2000 I think maybe 2001 2002 something in that kind of era that that actually became something the the cultural kind of recognition. Absorb and that to me was a really interesting parallel because if we look at what's happened with GLP ones that same kind of progression to cultural impact was not you know a decades long process that was four years. And the entire market is recognizing the impact of that already whether you know to your point Alicia whether it's you know a quick service kind of domain or a beer company and I think that is you know notable aspect of the way. Not just markets are shifting but the way culture is shifting and to me you know not to to make it all about Merseve but I think that really does go back to this idea of. Being able to recognize whether through the vast data set of search demand or how the terms you're mentioning earlier fill up between you know ozempics quick rise and then now not even kind of standing side by side with the search term like peptides.
That to me is just very indicative of how these these preferences change how the interests of consumers change and how that should inform certain strategic processes whether you're a market researcher or you know media company like yourselves or. A beverage company selling selling beer to patients who you know may have changing preferences. And I think that that really resonates with a subscriber to future commerce to who's not just looking to figure out how to affect you know the next quarter of returns obviously that's an important part of the business you and we all want incremental growth but also brands need to understand how consumers shifts and tastes and changes of preferences are being impacted by culture and how they are impacting culture. In return and I think you have really just accurately just kind of summed it all up for us is that this is no longer just like taking small snapshots kind of figuring out how we do this little bit by little bit maybe.
Maybe it's a program internally I think this a core competency of businesses now and it's required in order to stay competitive within the market. You all are early and you're killing it I feel like this is such an impressive first feet you just came out of stealth what's next for Mercev. Yeah yeah absolutely I think a lot and I'll try to keep this fairly brief but a huge emphasis and kind of effort from or end is I think we you know you mentioned the stealth period we stayed in for a first time and a lot of that was about really validating. The technology before we came out and established our brand and took that to market and we were very privileged to do so with some of the largest brands in the world you know some some really valuable agency partnerships that brought us in the door with some of these customers early on. And I think at this point we can lead with the validation with the trick with the kind of transparent trust in the data that surfaces.
I think really what comes next is the ability to start mapping those to each unique brand. And I actually appreciate what you mentioned earlier fill up about your onboarding experience with the platform and recognizing how much it could understand or learn about your work and your unique expertise and that to me really is the future of this industry every brand in the world has unique knowledge has unique insight and has unique consumers. And the same answer doesn't apply to more than one in most cases I think that to me is really where we go next is develop deepening that understanding of kind of like the unique aspects of each characteristic whether it's an attribute behind a persona that buys one brand or another or the search they made in chat you be here and add this on Instagram that led them to. You know the check out counter brick and mortar or to a cart you know check out online and I think. mapping those journeys from a from a user perspective and really understanding.
Not just the dollar figures or the numbers that may show up in some internal report really how that relates to culture you know exactly what we're doing with the GLP one report with the celebrity brands report. I think those are the areas we hope to really continue to flesh out and not just provide to the market as a whole but really lean in we're establishing a new function we're trying to dub and insights engineer. And it's kind of like taking the concept of a forward deployed engineer you may have seen from a palantir or some of these other larger kind of tech forward organizations and saying we recognize that research and insights as a function is strapped and you know it has. Limited resources to play with but if we can deploy not just the technology but a person who understands the technology and understands your unique landscape how can we help you and how can you help us innovate within the space that we're hoping to collaborate with it. Really that's the approach you want to take to you know rather than calling it customer relationships we like to frame them as partnerships and I think that really is the approach you want to take to every partnership moving forward.
Well if you want to go check out Mersev hey I highly recommend it only just because I've used it and not just because we've partnered the last month or two and I can't recommend it highly enough. Mersev.com me RCIV.com shy I've been such a pleasure to have you thank you for partnering with us specifically because I'm just be honest with you. Insights research studies are probably one of the most you know difficult things but the most valuable things that we do around here and having a partner who understands how valuable it is is extremely important to us and our audience they get so much out of it and so much. So this is and such an important time right now too as we go into the end of the year and people start thinking about what are the shifts that are going to drive the changes that they need to be programming towards for next year. So such a perfect time for us to be partnered in this so Mersev.com go check it out and thank you shy for coming on the show.
Absolutely thank you both Philip and Alicia this is a whole lot of fun and it really has meant the world to just really get the insight you've been bringing to the table as well. I think there is no better way to push the platform that to put it through real research real world kind of you know outcomes that we're all looking to achieve together and it's been an amazing process so far really looking forward to getting the celebrity brands report out. Follow that up with a few more. Thank you and thank you all for watching this episode of Future Commerce if it sparked something for you we'd love for you to like follow subscribe wherever you get your podcasts it helps more people join the conversation. We have Future Commerce physically in the real world through our print shop Future Commerce dot com the star shop you can get books like this is called lore it's our newest it's about 300 pages and it's asking you the question. Is the story of your brand one that's already written or one that your customers are writing for you it's this is big heavy stuff this is what's going to help you shape your future for next year go get this right now it's a worth the investment especially as you get planning for next year.
And that's because you need to plan for the future why because commerce shapes the future because commerce is culture we'll see you next time.
More episodes
More from Future Commerce

Cartographies of Meaning
Future Commerce

*TEASER* The Oreogate Lady Is NOT Real!
Future Commerce

Retail Media In Your Ears: Inside Dollar General's 21,000-Store Audio Network
Future Commerce

2026 Signals We’re Tracking: Commerce Evolves (Again), the Monoculture is Back,...
Future Commerce