Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
religionDec 26, 202414:41pending

Sanhedrin 9: When Is a Monetary Case a Capital Case?

Talking Talmud

About this episode

A long discussion on the dispute between Rabbi Meir and the rabbis in mishnah -- beginning with a case of a husband who accuses his wife of not being a virgin at marriage (tantamount, in this context to an accusation of adultery), and the dispute is over the question of whether the case requires 3 or 23 judges (is it a capital case or a monetary one)? (8 explanations addressing the interpretations of 3 vs. 23). Also, what if that same case were subject to conspiring witnesses... which means they were seeking the woman's death for her adultery. And what if there were conspiring witnesses about the witnesses that testified to the first set of witnesses? (Such that the testimony has to be thrown out)

Get every episode summarized

Each time Talking Talmud publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Sanhedrin 9: When Is a Monetary Case a Capital Case?

Talking Talmud

0:00
14:41

More episodes

More from Talking Talmud

View all episodes →