Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
religionFeb 2, 202516:18pending

Sanhedrin 48: Kingly vs. Courtly Executions

Talking Talmud

About this episode

A dispute between Abaye and Rava whether designating an item - in this case, a shroud - is sufficient to prohibit it from common use, or whether that designating is not enough to do so (Abaye prohibits; Rava permits). Plus, examples (pro and con), though in the end, the halakhah follows Rava. Also, with regard to a condemned person, the Gemara addresses the differences between a king's execution vs. when such an event is overseen by the court. With examples from the Bible - eg: King Achav and Navot, plus others.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Talking Talmud publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Sanhedrin 48: Kingly vs. Courtly Executions

Talking Talmud

0:00
16:18

More episodes

More from Talking Talmud

View all episodes →