About this episode
In capital cases, one arguing for conviction can change and argue for acquittal, but not the reverse - if it's before the time of handing down the verdict. But how does this presentation line up with other comparable sources? It seems that judges cannot reverse a decision to acquit. Also, judging a case in day and at night - where monetary cases are begun in the day time. How far is that taken? What can be done at night? Plus, parallels between the assessment of possible tzara'at and court cases. Including the rule against blind judges. So how could there be a blind judge?
Get every episode summarized
Each time Talking Talmud publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
