
San Jose Residents Sue Over ALPR Cameras
About this episode
Three San Jose residents have filed a class-action lawsuit against the city, alleging that its automated license plate reader cameras constitute mass surveillance and violate the Fourth Amendment. The suit targets the network operated by Flock Safety, which has expanded from a four-camera pilot in 2021 to 474 cameras citywide. While police claim these cameras have reduced crime rates, the plaintiffs argue they track innocent drivers and create databases that could be misused. They are seeking for the city to delete plate data within 24 hours unless police obtain a warrant. The Institute for Justice, representing the plaintiffs, has previously challenged similar ALPR fights nationwide. Despite recent rule tightening, including a 30-day storage limit and restrictions on camera placement, the city attorney maintains that their policies are transparent and legal for public safety. Flock Safety is also facing its own class-action lawsuit for data sharing, and Californias attorney general has sued El Cajon police over out-of-state handouts. This privacy clash with tech tools is ongoing, balancing safety and rights on the streets.
Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].
View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/7e4da2ce03cbce0f
Get every episode summarized
Each time California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Transcript ready
25 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! — San Jose Residents Sue Over ALPR Cameras. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
It's April 16th. This is California News Today, powered by AI. I'm Cory with the story. Three San Jose residents just filed a class action lawsuit against the city, saying its automated license-play reader cameras amount to mass. Surveillance that violates the Fourth Amendment. The suit targets the network run with flock safety, which started as a four-camera pilot in 2021 and now has 474. Cameras city-wide. Let's say these cameras have slash crime rates, but the plaintiffs argue they track innocent drivers and build databases that could be misused. They're pushing for the city to delete played data within 24 hours, unless cops get a warrant. Folks like Tony Tan worry the system could let agencies like ICE abuse it, turning everyday drives into a fishbowl of government watching. The Institute for Justice, repping them, has tackled similar ALPR fights nationwide. Last month, San Jose tightened rules after another suit-cutting storage to 30 days, banning
cameras at churches and clinics and blocking federal. Access. Still, the city attorney insists their policies keep things transparent and legal for public safety. Meanwhile, flock faces its own class action heat for data sharing, and California's attorney general sued El Cajon cops over out-of-state handouts. This privacy clash with tech tools is far from over, balancing safety and rights on the streets.
More episodes
More from California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Long Beach Coastline Under Siege | California News
California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Hollywood Hills Break-Ins Back-to-Back | California News
California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Amazon Truck Crash Kills One in Norwalk | California News
California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Westmont Wins Under Heat and Outage | California News
California News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!