
governmentJun 22, 202256:41pending
Roe & Departure From Precedent In The Supreme Court
About this episode
There’s long been a belief that the Supreme Court rarely departs from precedent. But as the court appears to intend to strike down Roe, we’re wondering what the data tell us about how consistent the Supreme Court has been at honoring precedent. And, is the Supreme Court more likely to depart from precedent in constitutional cases than other types?
To break it all down, we spoke to Washington University law professor Lee Epstein, about her 2015 paper, "The Decision To Depart (or Not) From Constitutional Precedent: An Empirical Study of the Roberts Court", co-authored by William M. Landes and Adam Liptak. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Not Another Politics Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Not Another Politics Podcast

Is the Median Justice Running the Supreme Court?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Apr 24, 20261:09:57failed

Why Does America Pay More For Infrastructure?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Mar 26, 202650:42failed

What Binary Questions Get Wrong About Voters
Not Another Politics Podcast
Mar 12, 202638:43failed

Do Dishonest People Self-Select Into Public Service?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Feb 19, 202652:58pending