
About this episode
Our annual March Around the World begins when we punch your ticket to the United Kingdom, where Nick Griffin offers his assessment of MP Rupert Lowe and his brand new Restore Britain party that nationalists on both sides of the Atlantic have been talking about. The former Member of the European Parliament also offers reasons for optimism, his opinion on the war in Iran, and takes questions from the audience.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
784 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed — Radio Show Hour 1 – 2026/03/07. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool. The Political Cesspool, known across the South and Worldwide, has the South's foremost Populous Conservative Radio Program, and here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool, is your host, James Edwards. Well, I hope you have your passports ready, folks, because TPC's annual March Around the World commences once again right now this Saturday evening, March the 7th, during this month long special series, as you know, we're going to be showcasing leaders and elected officials from across Europe as we seek to discover how our kinsmen are faring throughout the Western world tonight. We're going to take you to Australia, to Mexico, to Canada, but first, our first stop
in England, where our good friend Nick Griffin is standing by live to help us assess the situation in our mother country, and we are going to talk to all guests this month. All of them will be weighing in on current affairs in their respective ports of call, and also all eyes will be on Iran as well, so all guests this month will be talking about that situation. But first, we want to say hello to Nick. Nick, thank you for being back with us, and thank you for once again leading off this special series. Thanks, James. It's a pleasure. And an honor. All ours, my friend. So let's start here with the big news, not just in England, but really on both sides of the Atlantic Nationalist, populist, whatever you want to call us, very excited about Rupert Lowe and his brand new Restore Britain party. Let's take a quick listen to just about 60 seconds of excerpts from his announcement speech
a few days ago. The first priority is to control who comes to our country, and more importantly, who stays in our country. Restore Britain will not just stop mass immigration, we will reverse it. Restore Britain will make our communities safe again for women and children. That, I promise you. If that means millions go, then millions go. It's about who we are as a nation and who we are as a people. Britain is not just an economy. Britain is not just an idea. Britain is not just a passport. Britain is a nation. Britain is a people, our people, and Restore Britain will never allow that to be erased. This is Britain and we will do things our way. This political party now exists for one reason to restore Britain, to make it a better, safer, and more prosperous place for British men and women to raise their families.
It will be difficult and it will be painful. But I assure you, it is possible. I hope you will consider joining me on this journey and becoming a member of our party. It is our country, it is now our collective responsibility to act. Together, we will restore Britain. OK, so that is the message. It's on point. He has the right look. He has the right sound, the right issues. But everybody is weighing in on this. But I am interested to hear the opinion of a man who has been there and has done that and has led a very similar party and has reached the heights of the European Parliament. Nick is Rupert Lowe the real deal and can he in fact restore Britain? I think he is the real deal in his own head. I think he is genuine. He is a screaming mad Zionist, of course, but if he was going to say Britain, I could probably just about forgive him that.
But he has got the standard problem of people, especially on Newtapolitics, which he is. He is only in the House of Commons because he is stood on the reform that is at Nudger Farage's ticket. That is the only reason he is there. He is Newtapolitics. He is a banker and farmer. I have got all the time for the second and no time at all for the first. But he has got this typical new politician's problem of confusing the question of what should happen with what can happen. Yes, what he said there in his launch was wonderful and so on, when we get to power, we are going to do all these wonderful things. The problem is to do any of them. You have indeed to attain and keep power and Rupert Lowe and his restore party have absolutely no path to power. So this is hopeful, waffle, it is great sound bites. It is actually disastrous, potentially, in that if he achieves any sort of public support
and anything off of the internet, I am talking about real public support, all he will do is to split the reform UK vote, which of course is for another screaming zone. It is Nigel Farage, who is making very, very similar noises. If that vote is split, then the consequences will have from 2008, probably when the next election is, sorry, 2028 or 2029, the next election will then have another five years of a Labour government even worse with coalition greens or hardcore Marxists and islamists running this country until 2034 at the earliest. And that is all he can possibly achieve if he gets any serious votes, which in fact is very, very unlikely. It is a capital, I can tell you this, that when he actually registers his party, because he still hasn't done so, which is amateurish in its extreme and runs the risk, someone else can just steal the name, but when he gets it registered and he starts having meetings
and the far left and various immigrant groups start turning up outside them and smashing them up, he will be left with a choice which mostly had, which the national front had, which the British National Party had, do you resist this violence with physical force to defend your rights, and thereby immediately be slammed by the mass media as troublemakers and violent and fascist thugs etc etc, or do you run away and hide? My prediction is that Rupert Relo will run away and hide. If he doesn't, then he'll end up slammed with the same smears and slurs that we were in the past, and middle England will certainly then run away and vote for Nigel Farage as well. It's great sounding stuff, but it's going absolutely nowhere, and all it does is waste another three or four years while good-hearted nationalists think there's an electoral road out of this mess, instead of getting on with the job of organizing our communities to defend for themselves. Nick, I want to follow up with an observation about the growth thus far of Restore Britain
and a little more background on Rupert Lowe, and his very interesting relationship with Nigel Farage. You had an interesting relationship, because you could say it's well with him and somewhat similar, but Keith has a question first. After listening to you, I just have to wonder to myself, is there any path out of this conundrum for England, or is it going to have to just evolve into guerrilla war? All right, but before you answer that, Nick, keep that question in mind, because what Keith just asked, I will sort of add a little more information to it, so if my facts are correct, you have, what would be called the major parties? If you can go ahead and include Restore Britain in that, you have Reform UK, which is the largest, followed by the Labour, followed by the Green Party, followed by the so-called Conservative Party, then the Liberal Democrats, and then I think Restore Britain may have passed the Liberal Democrats now, perhaps even the Conservative Party? No, absolutely not James, the only poll which has been showing anything at all was actually
a push poll, a push poll is when voters are given a leading question, and at that point they turn up as 10%, but in actual terms, there's nothing like that, nothing like it. Well, that's a good point, you were looking at this from differently than I, I was going by purported membership numbers, what they're claiming that 100,000 members, yes, they have put them right in the question, fourth or fifth place, and growing, and they have grown at a rate that has certainly been remarkable, so you still think that there is a hard ceiling, even though they are, if the membership numbers are correct, which has them in the low hundreds, thousands now, in low six figures, Reform UK is only at about 270,000 members, did you think that there is a hard ceiling there? There's a hard ceiling at which they're not even going to reach. These are only people who pay 20 pounds a year, it's not really very much group commitment, they're not being asked to do anything, none of them are organised in any way, shape or form,
this is not a political party, this is a group of people hanging on every word of group at lows, but the tragedy of this is that if group at low were to understand that the next election is not his time, that he has to let reform get in and burn itself out, and that in the meantime he could take his 100,000 people, he could make it 150,000, he could become 200,000 very easily, and if he were to direct them and say instead of wasting probably five or six million pounds, eight million dollars or so, losing the next election and letting the Labour Green Coalition back in, instead of doing that, he would not to knuckle down and start saying, we are going to buy community centres, we are going to organise and train people, we're going to bring every single person who wants to fight an election to the one single election we're going to fight in the next general election, his own seat. If he was to do that then, after the next general election, he could, he would have the biggest and most effective grassroots nationalist type political movement that this country has
ever seen. It would be a spectacular thing, instead of that he is almost guaranteed to go ahead and I wrote about this on Stubbs, the other week, it's the charge in, it's the charge of the Light Brigade, it's the charge into the electoral valley of death, the charge of the Light Brigade was something which the British army did in the crime, in the Crime Me and War back against Russia in the 1850s, and the French general watching it. So Magnifique may send a public air, it's magnificent, but it's not war, and what Rupert Lois is about to do is magnificent is stupid, but it isn't sensible politics. Well something needs to be done, I don't know if you heard it, but Donald Trump supposedly said something this week, he was being challenged about alienating the Muslim world with the Iran War. He said, oh no, he said, you're wrong, he said, every Muslim country is behind us except for France and England, that can't be right, it would be true, but I believe did he really
say that? It's a very clever line isn't it, it's a very good line, if he was a comedian instead of the leader of those powerful country in the world he'd be a wonderful thing. We're going to get to Iran later this hour, but staying on this for a moment. So let's go a little more background here, some of this is very interesting, I actually do, people don't believe me, I spend more time researching the show than we spend on the air, and any good host should do that, but according to, correct me if I'm wrong, this is my like to go to unique for all things UK, you've been there, you've done that, you've led a political party, you have reached a high elected office, member of the European Parliament. Now if I've got this right though, Rupert Loe was once one of reforms that's Nigel Faraj's party, he was once an MP for reform, and he also had previously sat alongside Faraj as a member of the European Parliament, which is of course the governing body where you set, as an elected MP, so they had a falling out, and now he is a member of parliament
in the House of Commons, but Rupert, excuse me, Nigel Faraj had expelled him, and I think even called the police on him during that particular dismissal, so all of that having been said, and I'm going to play a clip from Nigel Faraj in just a moment that is just astonishing because of course he has been packaged, it's sort of like a Donald Trump like figure for the UK populist oversize to personality, but of course if you remember the origin, folks of Nigel Faraj, I mean he basically was meant to stop Nick Griffin, but nevertheless I digress. If you were advising Rupert Loe right now, or let me ask you this, you already gave the advice I guess, because you have written an open letter to him, this has been something on your sub-stack that you have written about, and by the way, Nick mentioned his sub-stack, if you go to thepoliticalsesspool.org and you click on the promo for tonight's broadcast, you'll see Nick Griffin's name highlighted and red, click on that link and it'll take you to his sub-stack, I am there every day, subscribe to it, support it.
But let me ask you this, what would be the differences do you say between the B&P of the early and mid-2000s and where Restort Britain may be going in the very near future? In terms of the policy on immigration, really not very different. In terms of lowers done some really good work with the anti-grooming gangs campaign, he crowd-funded about $800,000 to set up an independent inquiry into the grooming gangs to counter the government's rigged one. It wasn't that independent because he made a point not having me on and not having former members of the British National Party on, who were the ones that led the exposure of all this in the first place. So it's a self-serving thing, not that independent. But the same in terms of rhetoric and even policy on immigration, not that different. On everything else, enormously different because the man is not a proper nationalist.
He's in Israel first, the same as Trump has now turned out to be. He's a rampant free trader. His problem with Europe was that not with, was protecting Europe and which it was to extend, actually, but that it's not in favor of free trade. Now free trade is the thing which has gutted British industry, which has gutted American industry. You've got to have a government which says we're prepared to interfere with the financial system in order to serve our nation, our people, our industries, and he's just a free trader. He's just a 19th century conservative and actually saying what he says about immigration and Islam and so on, it's exactly the same as Winston Churchill used to do. And he's out of that sort of category, which I think will fair enough, but it's not nationalist. That's the thing. Okay. One other thing on this, especially James, I must say, on the absolute crux of it, Farage is take on immigration now and so the official reform position is that we should have net
zero immigration and the stupid people think that sounds good, he's going to stop immigration. What that means actually, and it's quite open about it, is that he's going to, he would allow in as many immigrants as Brits emigrate or die off. So under Nigel Farage, he'd be happy to have at least half a million immigrants a year, but what he wants is not Muslims, now he wants Hindus. He wants huge numbers of Indians, he's made that very, very clear. Now, the lowest position is rather more fudged, but he put out a tweet the other day which is very interesting. He complained about how the current immigration rules under the Labour Party favor people from the European Union, but they discriminate against, and he put, he made a short list of the Dominions. So this is Australia and Canada and so on, and he added in as a Dominion, as a former part of the British Empire, settled by white people, he added India in as a Dominion, saying it's not fair that we've got an immigration policy which discriminates against Australians and Indians. So I don't think he's that different to Farage, how can he be?
He's a merchant banky, he comes from the capitalist class, and if he didn't have mass immigration, the capitalist class in Britain are going to square and lose money. It's just the same as in the United States, where big business is one of the key draws and supporters of mass immigration. That's where he comes from, demographically and economically, Britain would be in terrible trouble without mass immigration, as a nationalist, I say I don't care, because the existence of my people and our long-term survival is more important than short-term economics. But restore life for Raj is there for the system and not for us. Okay, Nick. Now here is Nigel Farage, the aforementioned Nigel Farage, and we just heard that clip of Rupert Lowe. Now we can understand rhetoric and what the rhetoric and promises you make and very oftentimes differ from the policy you implement when you get elected. We've learned that all too well far too many times, but this is Nigel Farage speaking
now. And again, by his own admission, he was put into play to stop the BNP, to stop Nick Griffin as he has put it specifically. But he is sort of presented as the implicitly pro-white guy and the implicitly pro-white party, and at least the one that is interested with immigration control, that is how he has presented. This is some recent comments from Nigel Farage. Let's call impossibility to deport hundreds of thousands of people. We simply can't do it. At the moment, it's a political impossibility. But is it your ambition? No. On listen, I'm not going to start drawing ethnic lines on what being English is. Otherwise, we'll be back to DNA tests on whether you're Anglo-Saxon. I'm not going down that road. It's about how you feel, and it's about what your priorities are. That's what I'd say. In the last 20 years, the white British population has declined from 87% to 74%, is that a concern of yours? No.
OK. So with that out of bounds. A square up that guy. With friends of like that. Who needs enemies? So, I mean, again, comparing the two, would you say that there is a tangible difference, or at least one worth incredibly in one of the other? Yep. There's two differences. First is that Lowe's rhetoric is far, far better, and Farage, like Maloney in Italy, would keep out some of the illegals and some of the Muslims, unless in vast numbers of Hindus instead. So that's the first key difference. So Lowe's better in that regard. The second is that Nigel Farage has a serious minority chance of forming the next government. And Rupert Lowe is not going to win a single seat in the next election. So he can sew whatever he likes. He's no different to the National Front still exists to with about 200 elderly skinned members. They can say, when we get power, we're going to do this, but they're not going to come
to power. So it's a nonsense. Both of them, both Farage and Lowe, are guilty more than anything else of wasting the time of good people who could be getting on doing really serious things, preparing for the time when we become a minority, or if Bush comes to shove, preparing for the time when it becomes a civil war. But there's no way that losing an election is going in any way to prepare you for some sort of civil war. Sounds like you've got a problem in leadership in England. It sounds like everybody that is supposed on the right is weakest grandma's tea. And you know, we just, it gets down to the, you said that the business class is against cutting off immigration or re-migrating people. What is the problem? We've got the same problem over here. The unions, you know, if they had it just for native people, I mean, they would use all their power to, you know, make labor as expensive as possible. How do we deal with that?
Well, first of all, Keith, before that, come back for a moment, you said, seems like we've got a particular problem in Britain with leadership. We have, but it's not just Britain. There's a problem all over Western Europe. Yeah. Very simple. We're more marked. They don't even lie good in England. But you've got the same thing in it to do the same thing in Germany. In all of our countries, until, say, 15 years ago, nationalism and resistance to mass immigration was represented by genuine nationalists myself and other, and other comrades. And as huge and systematic attempt successful in the end was made to destroy or utterly marginalize that sort of nationalism and put fakes and time wasteers in place instead. And that is what we've got with all these parties, whether they talk a good fight or not. If they're not working to organize our people properly, then they are wasting people's time and money. And I'm absolutely sure it's not just accidental. It's quite deliberate. This is controlled opposition at its worst.
All right, Nick. When we come back from our bottom of the hour break, we have about two or three minutes before we hit that. We're going to come back with Nick and we're going to do a segment on Iran. And then we have a lot of questions that have come in from the audience. I don't know if we can get to them all, but we will do a rapid fire segment in our fourth and final segment this hour with Nick to try to take as many of those questions as we can that have come in for him. And then we will depart in the second hour to Australia, withdrew Fraser, then down to Mexico and then over to Canada or neighbor to the north with Paul from in the third hour. So stay tuned for all of it tonight. But Nick, one thing that I found interesting from your no-nonsense assessment tonight of Rupert Lowe. And again, folks, go to Nick's sub-stack. If you want to read a lot of this for yourself, his open letter to Lowe, a lot of his takes on this and so many other things I could give you the URL. But the easiest way to know it is to just go to thepoliticalsesspool.org. You go to our promo for tonight's broadcast and Nick Griffin's name will be highlighted
in red on that entry. You click it and you're at a sub-stack book market, support it, read it. I am there every day. But Nick, you were saying in spite of the astronomical growth which has been, again, as I say, remarkable in terms of reported membership, that they will not be able to parlay that into any elected seats in the next year or two? Or not in the, if there's no one standing for reform, then they can turn it into local council seats quite easily. But in the parliamentary election, remember his first pass, the post, exclusively, Lowe was elected for reform and Nigel Farage in the European Parliament initially on a mixed representation basis, being Parliament, British Parliament, you have to be number one. And they will not win any seat. The only seat he could possibly win, he could hold his own seat in great Yarmouth. If he threw every single thing into it, but instead of that, he's talking about fighting three, four, five hundred seats out of six hundred and fifty.
If he does that, he will certainly not win a single one. I reiterate, all he can do, unless he gets in a four-way seat, a four-way fight, you have to get 25% plus of the entire vote. And there is no earthly possibility of them doing that. At the very, very top, they might get 10%, I think it's more likely they'll get 1%, if they've got 10%, all they will do is ensure that the Labour Party and their future green and Islamist allies take virtually every seat in the House of Commons in the next Yarmouth election. And at the end of that would then be a total of eight more years of hard left Labour government, with at least half a million brits leaving every single year and more open doors coming in. At the end of that, there's no way back. That's how serious it is. Well, I mean, we want it, no, not, since we want it, we want it to clear-eyed, but plain is Billy Goetz's House on a stump, as they say, on the country, before we write back,
stay tuned. How would you like to help this program reach more people and earn silver at the same time? News this hour from Town Hall, I'm Mary Rose, President Trump joins grieving families for the return of soldiers killed in war in the Middle East. President Trump is attending the dignified transfer for the six U.S. soldiers killed in the Middle East at Delaware's Dover Air Force Base. He joins family members and most of his cabinet as the soldiers remains returned to the U.S. They died last week in a drone strike on a command center in Kuwait. Trump spoke earlier Saturday at an event in Florida. He's pledging to keep American war deft down at the same time he said he will keep the pressure on Iran. The six members of the Army Reserve are all from the 103rd system command based in Des Moines, Iowa. I'm Julie Walker.
The U.K. military is rejecting criticism of its response after last week's strikes by Israel and the U.S. Britain's chief of defense air chief Marshall Sir Richard Nighten reject criticism that they were ill-prepared for the conflict in Iran. What the Prime Minister and the Defense Secretary have made clear and what's very clear to me is that this is probably the most dangerous time of the last 30 or years that I've been in uniform and is very clear that the demands on defense are rising and that's why I think the Prime Minister said in his Munich Security Conference speech that we need to spend more on defense and it's faster and you won't be surprised that I agree wholeheartedly with what the Prime Minister said. He also said that the U.K. could join more proactive strikes in the future while the focus remains on protecting British interests and personnel, Regan Garcia, London. And stranded Americans across the Middle East say they've been left to navigate flight cancellations and confusing government guidance on their own. They expressed frustration with the State Department's directions to depart now on commercial
flights, even though the airspace remains closed or heavily restricted, more on these stories at townhall.com. All you need to do is call Big Blue at 800-555-2085. Blue will make sure the scales are tipped in your favor. Call 800-555-2085. Big Blue will answer your call and work to fit you into a term life policy that you can afford. Remember, Big Blue is like you.
He's on meds, too. Call 800-555-2085-8555-2085. Hey friends, it's James. Did you know that every issue of the American Free Press now features my own published Q&A interviews with one of your favorite guests from the radio program? That's right. The American Free Press has officially partnered with TPC to expand our audience into the realm of print media. I encourage you to read it for yourself by subscribing today at americanfreepress.net. Did you know that regular TPC contributors like Nick Griffin and Jose Nino also have their own exclusive, insightful, and hard-hitting columns published in every issue of the American Free Press? I love this paper and read it as soon as it lands in my mailbox. Whether you prefer to receive the print edition or a digital subscription, the choice is yours when you subscribe at americanfreepress.net. We are advancing, but we need to be wise and well informed. Enhance your intellectual ammunition today by subscribing to America's last real newspaper. If you enjoy listening to this broadcast, you'll love reading the American Free Press.
Subscribe today by calling 1-888-699-News or by visiting americanfreepress.net. Hey y'all, do you enjoy great tasting coffee but are tired of supporting companies that hate you? If so, let me tell you about above-time coffee. Above-time coffee is a privately owned and operated small business. They hand roast coffee and ship it to customers throughout the United States in a broad. The top coffee was launched because they saw a need for more pro-white businesses serving our people. The time has come to take our own side, and did I mention their coffee tastes great? It's the best coffee I've ever tasted. When James brought home a sample from a conference, I was hooked and threw out all the other brands. I think you will too after you make an order at above-timecoffee.com. Living a healthy and active lifestyle is important to us, and I appreciate the effort above timecoffee invest in keeping its products organic, and there are so many flavors to choose from. Check it out for yourself by visiting above-timecoffee.com. It's the only coffee we drink at the Edward's Home.
Delicious coffee. A company that serves the interest of our people. Check out their selection today at above-timecoffee.com. Once again, our first stop on our March Around the World's 2026 edition is in the UK, a
little bit… The Old Motherland. The West of London, if I'm looking at my map correctly, but nevertheless, we thank Nick Griffin for being with us here in the early morning hour of Sunday, while we're live here at 636 Memphis Time, and Nick, before we move on to Iran, you wanted to say that it is not all gloom and doom, and in fact, in some ways, you are more optimistic than ever. Yeah, in every way, James, in every way. I was on a strangely enough, one of Britain's main hardline Muslim podcasts a few weeks ago. We discuss all sorts of things, and we disagree on many things, but we agree on some particularly foreign policy, and the fact that if it wasn't for the way that the West in general and the Zionists and Neocons in particular have wrecked their countries, most of those people wouldn't be in our countries. So, anyway, I was on this show, and I said to them, you do realise that the British people that you're now dealing with are nothing like the ones you grew up with, that the British … Something has clicked in the British psyche, and we're utterly different to the people
that you think you live among, so be very careful of these people. And I felt, and I think I understood that. You can see it everywhere, Britain, the white areas are festooned with our flags now. Just thousands upon thousands of the modern lamppost telegraph bowls, it's a stunning thing. The electoral support to reform, you bear in mind that, as you said, James, at one point in the reform are ahead. They've got a larger membership, they're also ahead of the official governing parties. They've been the governing party for more than a hundred years, they're consistently ahead of them in the opinion polls. There's an enormous electoral support change, the membership surge for restore. It's an astounding thing. It could go further. So, there's this enormous change going on. I was with your friend and mine, Jim Dawson, a week or so ago, and we took from the temple as a donation. We went up to a suburb of Manchester, and we went up to a neighbourhood patrol, been
set up the good local fellas, and we took them several thousand dollars worth of ballistic vests, radios and gopros and things. Things they need to be more effective at their community patrols, and I was talking with people, we went around with them through the shopping centre and the states and so on, talking with local people there. Now, I campaigned there in 2009, and again, the level of political awareness, sophistication and resilience and willingness to resist everything that's going on amongst people, it's transformed, it's absolutely enormous. So, I was someone the other day was criticising my criticism of the Rupert Lowe and said, but it's either the Rupert Lowe and Restore, or it's war. Well, yeah, okay, so admit the Rupert Lowe is not going anywhere, so yes, we are facing in this country a sort of, at the very least, low level, if not higher, civil war. But there are two sorts of war. There's coal, there's always hot war, and there's very often a cold war. And as long as our community is strong and resilient enough, then the others aren't going
to have a go at us, it's not going to become a hot war, it can become a cold war in a society which vulcanises itself, which divides up, so their communities live in their bit, and ours live in ours, and to me that's one hell of a lot better than integration, which is basically when you're 8% of the world's population, integration is a death sentence. So that's where we are, we are going to become for a while a minority in our own country, which is why Americans are going to become a minority in your own country. It doesn't mean you're doomed, they're going to come and cut your throat to all the rest of it. We can be, and all the signs are that we're going to be, we're going to be a well-organised, confident, and the dominant minority, and people say, oh, all the browns, they're going to get them out and be you, there's no such thing as brown, certainly in this country, there's muslims, and there's Hindus, and there's Sikhs, and they hate each other far more than any of them hate us. So as long as we're a well-organised minority, we will dominate this country for the entire foreseeable future, well beyond the life of my children and grandchildren, and during that time things will happen in the world, and especially the West clearly is losing its
economic dominance. When we lose our economic dominance and we become unable to live off the fat at the rest of the world, our countries will be less attractive, and most of these people will simply go home. One last thing on this, I've spoken to two very well-placed muslims recently, and to a couple of Hindus, they also the same thing, all their educated young people, which is more and more of them, more of them going to universities now than our kids, they all can't wait to emigrate and get out of Britain because they think it's a cold, dreary backwater with no economic future, and they're not really wanted here. So long term, we will not lose this country, we will hold what we have, and one day we'll take it all back. Let me make a modest proposal, like Jonathan Swift said. Is electoral fraud a problem over there, like it is here? We have been so used to the fact that we're going to lose the elections, but what we had in America is a reluctance of black voters to go to the poll, and the Voting Rights Act
of 65 was basically intended to allow for proxy voting on behalf of the Lutton Black voters, you know, mail-in ballots, unlimited absentee-balloting, extended early voting periods, is there voter fraud going on in England like there is in America? On a staggering scale, Keith, on a staggering scale, and Nudgefaroj has just started complaining about it. It was past of the tricks he used to stop the BNP back in the day. The other fascinating factor is there are more Brits not even registered to vote, and I mean, British Brits. There's more Brits not even registered to vote, that elected our last Labour government. And if people were serious about doing electoral politics, the damn first thing we should do is start getting our people to register. But no, these people are rank amateurs, hell-based on wasting time, and they're not going to die. You need to save it over there, like we have here. You need to have a, you know, all the voting on election day from eight in the morning
until seven in the evening with picture ID and a specified party. Yeah, certainly. You need that. But the Labour Party is not going to bring it in because they designed the system to encourage the minorities to vote. They rely on them, and they are not going to change that. All right, so we have, I really want to get to these questions because it's important to get to audience questions. And we did a big show last week on Iran. We're going to continue to cover it with every guest that appears from whatever country they may be reporting in from this month. But, and we want to get Nick to chime in on this as well, we could have done a full hour with you, Nick, on Iran. But I did feel like it was important to have you touch on Rupert Lowe because that is such a big talking point right now amongst our people throughout the West. But, so one of the things on your sub-stack, and by the way, your sub-stack is permanently affixed to our daily reads on our blog, or you can link over there as well, folks.
But one of the most recent posts was betrayal. It's what populists do, and that would certainly, certainly apply to this most recent conflict in Iran, led by the Trump administration. You're, and by the way, we've got a big feature coming up in the American Free Press. Nick Griffin has contributed to that. He's in every issue of the American Free Press as it is, but a big panel discussion on this. Nick, your take on Iran and Trump's involvement in the U.S.'s involvement on behalf of Israel in that conflict. Yeah, well, I'm sure that my basic take on it is the same as all your other people and so on, and the vast majority of your listeners. It is a scandalous betrayal to turn from mega to mega, which is what you've now got. I make Israel great again, administration, enormous expense. I saw a figure of $100 million. The U.S. has already spent shooting down Iran, some of Iran's cheap drones, $100 billion. It's a staggering figure.
So it's costing America money. There's the first six. Nothing's too good for me as Israelis. Sorry, say again. That's it. Nothing's too good for our Israeli friends. Nothing's too good for them, of course. Indeed not. Not where Mr. Epstein's people have got the photos. So no, it's obviously it's a disgrace and a scandal. The question is, is it also a ghastly geopolitical era? We don't yet know. It depends. Not just clearly Iran's got enough missiles and drones. The question is whether enough of the launch systems of the missiles have been destroyed so they can't actually launch them. Because if, it's not a question of F, when the very expensive air defense missiles run out, which they're going to, and the fears I've seen are between four days from the start to four weeks after that they run out, basically, if the Iranians are still able to fire their drones and their ballistic after that, then it'll be very, very clear that the only possible
way forward for the coalition of Satan in this would actually be some kind of insane ground, insane ground war, which America for all its military might and all the bravery of your soldiers, you will lose a ground war in Iran, if not, and they're not going to even try that. What they may do, they're not going to try the ground war. I think what they're going to, I don't know about that. Well, let me just say my, put in my two cents, I think they're going to bomb them back into the Stone Age and leave them there. Well, to bomb them back into the Stone Age doesn't win the war. That's right, that's the thing. And if you look at that. Well, certainly, I'd take some away from having any power to come back. We've got to take a break. We've got to continue this discussion. It is common for politicians, major media outlets, and nonprofits to hype white on black murders aggressively, or even claim that blacks are living in fear of white people. Lens for simply being black.
Hard to believe, but that's what was done, and some people still want to do that. This is why National Conservative launched the Interracial Homicide Tracking Project. We have now documented well over 2,000 confirmed Interracial Homicides since January 2023, and created the most comprehensive overview of these killings anyone has ever made. We plug the gaping holes in data left by other homicide trackers and government prime stats. Rather than engaging in hyperbole and vitriolic rhetoric like everyone else, we are simply creating a massive sample size of empirical evidence so people can form rational and informed opinions about a sensitive and politically charged issue. Visit natcon.life, N-A-T-C-O-N-D-L-I-F-E. As you are aware, America is divided over every fault line possible. This is intentionally fostered by those who do not love God, family, or country. We believe a peaceful future as a free people absolutely depends on civility.
Clarion Call for Civility is looking for funding and volunteers at every level to make our hopes and efforts a reality. Please donate, sign our pledge, and help us in our sacred cause. Please visit callforcivility.com for more details. Callforcivility.com. Introducing Managed IT Services from NPI. We offer top-notch data backup and recovery, e-mail spam protection and network security tailored to your needs and budget. With 20 plus years of experience in the medical field, our HIPAA certified consultants know what it takes to protect sensitive information. Don't settle for less. Give us a call at 801-70669-80 and experience the difference with Managed IT Services. Remember, your IT support should be fast, efficient, and reliable. You know, when I come into the studio on nights like this with guests like Nick Griffin, I sighted myself, I don't have to do this.
I get to do this. And this is why we are still doing this after 22 years. Here on your AM Airwaves, AM 1600, WMQM and Memphis, and live all over the world. Thanks for the Liberty News Radio Network and the godsend that the Internet has been. Just a quick thing on the Iranian war panel discussion. In your next issue of the American Free Press, there is a collection of 10 participants that I gathered. And I asked them just to share their reaction to the escalating conflict in the Middle East, focusing on what stands out to them. And as a result, it was a wide variety of diverse perspectives, covering topics such as military tactics, the potential impact on Trump's legacy, the U.S. midterm elections, and possible global geopolitical shifts and realignments. Israel's role likely outcomes and much more Nick is one of those 10 participants and you don't want to miss it. After a brief embargo with exclusivity by AFP, we'll have it posted on the Internet that our website and elsewhere.
But Nick, now we are going to transition to questions from the audience and we are going to have to make haste. So I will serve these up as quickly as I can. If you can put a stopwatch at about 90 seconds, it'll be a brief response, but that will allow us to work through as many of these as we can. And we want to do that. So here we go with the first one. In the recent UK election, near Manchester, the Green Party, which is led by a blankly blank, blank, that defeated Nigel Farage's supposedly surging reform party, the Labour Party came in a distant third. The Green Party candidate was a silly woke cat lady who rails against the wealthy while making millions as a property magnate. It was the Muslim block vote that elected the Greens. And the question is from this listener, is that a sign of things to come and has Farage shot himself in the foot by putting Muslim Sikhs in Hindus in leadership positions and his implicitly pro white party? It is a sign of things to come.
It's a sign of things to come in areas with a significant Muslim population, the Muslim population in that seat is about 30%. But given that they're all registered to vote, at least 20% of the white population is not registered to vote, and given that all the Muslims turn out in vote, while well under half of the whites turned out to vote, that's what makes the difference. So in areas where there's a big Muslim population, the Greens are going to win, and they'll win because people will vote for them rather than the Labour Party, because they've got more chance of keeping reform out, or over the rest of Britain, which is still the vast majority of it actually, where the Muslim block vote simply isn't there, then Farage and reform are the ones who are going to win in the next German election rather than the Greens. So that's where the danger comes in a root but low. If he splits that vote, the Greens and the Labour Party will become the next government. But you know that's strange, it's a difference from what we have in America, we have reluctant black voters, and the white voters don't get out, and the England, the white voters don't go out, but the Muslims show up 100%.
It's that way around on the irony of it, I know this from the campaigns years ago, is that the people who meet them in the street, or they see you on the street, and they lean out of the houses, and they wave to you, and so on, the ones who are your firmest supporters are almost inevitably not even on the electoral roll, because they're the people who years ago have decided all politicians are the same, they're all scum, and it's too late to do anything about it through the ballot box, so I'm not going to bother. So the people who actually should be there, voting for people like Rupert Low, simply are not going to be there on the ballot papers, sorry on the ballot roll. To Keith's point about Muslims and yours as well, Nick, and I have not independently verified all of these facts that are being asserted here in these questions and statements, but I do know that we have such a well-informed audience, I don't even need to, so we will roll with this one. Nick, this one comes in from a listener, and it reads, it is a gelable offense in the UK for anyone to go in a voting booth with another, yet many Muslim men were seeing doing this with their wives in the most recent election.
The poll watchers were told to ignore this in the name of cultural sensitivity, is this a widespread practice in the UK? It is widespread, and actually it's really, it's a so-what, are they actually, and now your forearms are trying to imply that those women might have voted for his candidate if they hadn't been forced to by the husbands. The reason the husbands are going in there is because they are completely, these women, it's cousin marriages and so on from the subcontinent, and they are absolutely illiterate or they can't read English at all, so they're in there so that they vote the way that they actually want to vote, because the whole community is voting that way. So it doesn't actually give you the excuse for the black voting and through black preachers and everything, they say, well, we're just voting in your best interest, we know that if you were smart enough to actually be a voter, this is why you would vote. The irony of it, by the way, is that the only way that the Muslims could actually really get sort of what they want would be if there was a proper hardline nationalist like me standing, and I get stopped by Muslims in the street all the time now saying, well, you know, you used to disagree with you, but everything you say, you know, thank you for what you say about Gaza, thank you for being anti Zionist,
and also these people, because they're basically religious type traditionalists, they're not all crays, fanatics, but they are religious, genuine religious people. So the stuff which Christian should be appalled by, the LGBT things and so on, it really bothers them, but they still turn out and vote green who are committed to legalizing all drugs, absolutely committed to the LGBT nonsense in its worst possible forms. And they simply don't belong voting for them, but in the end, they're scared that they vote for reform or anyone like that, you know, their cousins will be stopped coming in, etc, etc, the hijab might be banned. So of course, they all turn out and vote against them. You know, Nick, that we're onto something now, this is an epiphany we've had here just here tonight. Nick Griffin runs for office again and is wept in by... On the Muslim vote. God's will be dead. Andron ballots. God will be done. Go Nick. Ah, well, a day is filled. Same thing.
Alright, this is a question about the royal family, which is always interesting to us here at a state side. The listener writes, in light of the former Prince Andrew being accused of treason, will the establishment, and he's talking about the families that go back to 1066 in the Magna Carta, demand that King Charles step down to be replaced by the more popular William and Kate. Could Charles use his cancer as an excuse for abdicating? He could use it as an excuse for abdicating if he wants to. It was always apparent when his mother was on and on and on living far longer than expected. He was rather frustrated by that. He wanted to be King. I don't expect that to change. He's a far more active King than William is a Prince of Wales. But he's so stupid. He's always keeping his staggering, he's stupid. You don't know how stupid he is, I'll explain it. He went to one of the most expensive schools in England, with all the best possible tuition. And he only managed to get two O levels, which is the basic level of competence at the age of 16.
And one of those was in art. Now, by comparison, I got nine O levels and that's fairly standard. You go, don't get to give up. What is liberalism? He comes by liberalism. Yes, absolutely. But the idea that the establishment would force him to stand down. And in any case, William is no better than his father. They're utterly liberal, utterly anti-R people. They have no use to us whatsoever. Why don't we get rid of the monarchy altogether then? Oh, because then we end up with a president. What do they do? We do have fun with every time Nick Griffith is on. I mean, it may not always be what we want in here. We're going to do everything a Hindu can do. Here's one more, Nick. And by the way, if you're not reading Nick Griffith's sub-stack, what are you doing? You should be there. If the, what's going on in the UK is of any interest to you, deeppoliticalsesspool.org, click over to it and send our daily reads on the blog.
Permanently affixed. It is in the show promo for tonight's live broadcast. His name is highlighted. Click over there. Join it. Subscribe to it. Read it as I do every day. And here's one last one with two minutes remaining. And stay tuned for Nick Griffith. And also on every issue of the American Free Press, including my most, well, not most recent, but forthcoming feature on the war in Iran. But once again, another blankly, blank, blank, blank at the heart of British government is Peter Mendelsson, who is accused of treasonous behavior to the advantage of Jeffrey Epstein, the labor leader's John Smith and Jeremy Corman, kept Mendelsson at arm's length. Tony Blair and Kierstormer embraced Mendelsson. Why? Were they implicit? Because he's Jewish. In his treason or blackmailed? That's the question. Well, he was always known as the Dark Prince, basically. They respected his dark arts. And of course, he had all the right connections.
You know, Keith, your question, I'm sure, knows. And Keith's indicated he knows. He's there because they were, whereas Cork Corbin in particular, was for all his many, many faults. He was genuinely up to a certain point. He was anti-zionist. It hasn't got a clue or never prepared to confront the deeper, Talmudic problem, which is the origin of the Zionist horror. There's deep racism. But he was genuine anti-zionist. And so he wouldn't touch Mendelsson. He was doing that, right? He's an arch-dionist. And that's why they got rid of him. Whereas Blair and Stormer are rampant Zionists. So Mendelsson was their man. It suited them to have someone who was close to Epstein. And now he doesn't. So they try and run away. But nothing unusual there. Those people stick together. All right, Dick Griffin. It has been an honor as always. And so especially special to have you kick off this annual series, which is such as a light to us.
But we've spent the entire month of March speaking with exclusively international guests or at the very least expats who are living abroad. And to have you from England tonight weighing in on all of these important topics. Sorry for all the questions that came in that we could not get to. We do the best we can with the time we've got. Follow his substag. Nick will talk to you again soon. Not soon enough, of course. But we will talk to you again soon. Thank you James. Good night and God bless you. God bless you. Indeed. Indeed. Professor Drew Fraser. What's going on down under? We'll find out. Stay tuned. Professor Drew Fraser. What's going on down under? We'll find out. Stay tuned.
More episodes
More from The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed

Radio Show Hour 1 – 2026/03/14
The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed

Radio Show Hour 2 – 2026/03/14
The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed

Radio Show Hour 3 – 2026/03/14
The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed

Radio Show Hour 2 – 2026/03/07
The Political Cesspool Radio Show Podcast Feed