
Question from a Hindu Background Believer (QoW #1001)
About this episode
A listener asks Dr. William Lane Craig how Christianity's dependence on a historical resurrection (unlike Hinduism's Krishna) can be defended, then raises three questions that arise in evangelism: that "eternal life" can't be historically verified, that the NT accounts were written too late to trust, and that no clear OT prophecy points to a risen Messiah. Dr. Craig affirms Anil's core insight, that Christianity's rootedness in history is a strength, not a weakness, while showing that the empty tomb, appearances, and disciples' transformation are historically well-attested, that historians still trust ancient biographies (like those of Alexander the Great) written centuries after their subjects' deaths, and that the disciples' unexpected belief in the resurrection is itself evidence for it, precisely because it ran against Jewish expectations.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Reasonable Faith Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Reasonable Faith Podcast

Eternal Generation of the Son: Dr. Craig Responds to the Backlash
Reasonable Faith Podcast

Annihilationism and Penal Substitutionary Atonement Once More (QoW #1006)
Reasonable Faith Podcast

Why Not the Beatific Vision Now? (QoW #1005)
Reasonable Faith Podcast

A Megachurch Pastor's Eight Reasons for Leaving the Faith and Where They Go Wron...
Reasonable Faith Podcast