About this episode
The standard reading of David Hume's Treatise is that it reveals him as a sceptic and also as an advocate of a science of man. These two aspects seem to be in tension. The sceptical Hume seems opposed to the more positive contribution he makes about human nature. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Paul Russell suggests a way of solving this riddle. Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Philosophy Bites publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Philosophy Bites
Lani Watson on the Power of Questions
Philosophy Bites
Peter Singer on Ending Innocent Lives
Philosophy Bites
Jing Hu on Songzi on Insults and Shame
Philosophy Bites
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein on Mattering
Philosophy Bites