Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentOct 7, 20241:15:51pending

Oral Argument: Williams v. Washington | Case No. 23-191 | Date Argued: 10/7/24

About this episode

Case Info: Williams v. Washington | Case No. 23-191 | Date Argued: 10/7/24 | Date Decided: 2/21/25

Link to Docket: Here.

Question Presented: Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court.

Holding: Where a state court’s application of a state exhaustion require­ment in effect immunizes state officials from §1983 claims challenging delays in the administrative process, state courts may not deny those §1983 claims on failure-to-exhaust grounds.

Result: Reversed and remanded.

Voting Result: Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett joined as to Part II.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Oral Advocates:

  • For petitioners: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C.
  • For respondent: Edmund G. LaCour, Jr., Solicitor General, Montgomery, Ala.

Website Link to Opinion Summary: Here.

Apple Podcast Link to Opinion Summary: Here.

Get every episode summarized

Each time The High Court Report publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Oral Argument: Williams v. Washington | Case No. 23-191 | Date Argued: 10/7/24

The High Court Report

0:00
1:15:51

More episodes

More from The High Court Report

View all episodes →