Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentJun 18, 202516:01pending

Opinion Summary: Perttu v. Richards | Date Decided: 6/18/25 | Case No. 23–1324

About this episode

Opinion Summary: Perttu v. Richards | Date Decided: 6/18/25 | Case No. 23–1324

Link to Docket: Here.

Question Presented: In cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, do prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim?

Holding: Parties are entitled to a jury trial on PLRA exhaustion when that issue is intertwined with the merits of a claim that requires a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment.

Result: Affirmed.

Voting Breakdown: 5-4. Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch and Jackson joined. Justice Barrett filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh joined.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Oral Advocates:

  • For petitioner: Ann M. Sherman, Solicitor General, Lansing, Mich.
  • For respondent: Lori Alvino McGill, Charlottesville, Va.

Website Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Apple Podcast Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Get every episode summarized

Each time The High Court Report publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Opinion Summary: Perttu v. Richards | Date Decided: 6/18/25 | Case No. 23–1324

The High Court Report

0:00
16:01

More episodes

More from The High Court Report

View all episodes →