Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentMar 5, 202512:04pending

Opinion Summary: Bufkin v. Collins | Date Decided: 3/5/25 | Case No. 23-713

About this episode

Case Info: Bufkin v. Collins | Date Decided: 3/5/25 | Case No. 23-713

Link to Docket: Here.

Question Presented: Must the Veterans Court ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38  U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1), which directs the Veterans Court to "take due account" of VA's  application of that rule?

Holding: The VA’s determination that the evidence regarding a service-re­lated disability claim is in “approximate balance” is a predominantly factual determination reviewed only for clear error.

Result: Affirmed.

Voting Breakdown: Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined.  Justice Jackson filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Oral Advocates:

  • For petitioners: Melanie L. Bostwick, Washington, D. C.
  • For respondent: Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.

Website Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Apple Podcast Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Get every episode summarized

Each time The High Court Report publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Opinion Summary: Bufkin v. Collins | Date Decided: 3/5/25 | Case No. 23-713

The High Court Report

0:00
12:04

More episodes

More from The High Court Report

View all episodes →