OPINION: Impeachment is not a television show | Sept. 10, 2026

0:00Hey, Yadis, this is Nick and Jack from the Best One Yet Podcast. Now, the last company we worked at, they used Paylosity and everything just worked. It wasn't until launch our own media business, this show, that we realized how where that is. Because Paylosity is one delicious burrito of operationally. They roll up HR, finance, and IT seamlessly into one delicious bite. But everything wraps together like that all at once, your workforce, your tech stack, your business. You don't need more tools, you don't even need cilantro. You need one solution. And that is why Paylosity built a single platform to connect HR, finance, and IT with AI-driven insights and automated workflows that simplify the complex and power what's next. Or as we caught a delicious operational burrito. Yes, we do experience a one place for all your HCM needs besties. So start now at paylosity.com slash one paylosity.com slash ONE. Thank you for calling the Bombas Comfort Line. Bombas makes socks, slippers, tees, and underwear made with the highest quality materials. Press one for comfort, two for style, three for donation.

1:01You chose style. Bombas are styles for whatever you enjoy. You can run in Bombas, lounge in Bombas, dress them up, dress them down, but always give back in Bombas. Because with every item purchased, another is donated. Bombas Comfort worth calling for. Go to bombas.com slash audio and use code audio for 20% off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com and use code audio. This podcast is brought to you by Thompson Reuters. The best don't just do their work. They change what's possible. Cases one, audits completed, jobs saved. Behind every one of those moments is a professional who needed to get it right and did. Thompson Reuters builds the technology that sharpens insights, speeds up decision making, and powers the outcomes that matter. So when professionals act, the impact is felt by everyone. Be a change maker. Visit tr.com forward slash change makers. Impeachment is not a television show. We are now being told that the impeachment trial of vice president Sarah Duterte must be abbreviated because people are losing interest.

2:02The proceedings, we are warned, are becoming over long. If they continue at their present pace, they may drag on beyond Christmas. This is a troubling way to frame a constitutional process. Impeachment is not a television show whose continuation depends on audience ratings. Its purpose is neither to entertain the public nor produce a verdict before the holiday season. Its purpose is to determine the truth about grave accusations against a high public official while giving that official a fair opportunity to answer. That duty does not disappear when people become impatient. Constitutional accountability cannot be hostage to an audience's attention span. Efficiency is legitimate. Repetitive questions can be avoided, witnesses managed better and lawyers required to focus on relevant facts. But efficiency means removing waste from the process, not removing charges merely because proving them takes time. The repeated warnings about the trial extending beyond Christmas reveal a disturbing inversion of priorities. The calendar is becoming more important than the evidence. Instead of asking how much time is reasonably necessary to uncover the truth, some officials

3:04seem to be asking how much truth can be accommodated before December. Christmas is not a constitutional deadline. It may be a convenient political target for senators and prosecutors who want closure before the new year. But convenience cannot determine accountability. If evidence requires proceedings beyond Christmas, they should continue. The Senator Judges are not alone in displaying this preoccupation with time. Even the House Prosecution Panel is contemplating skipping the article on alleged bribery so that it can proceed to the article on unexplained wealth and shorten the trial. Prosecutor Joel Chua has said that the panel does not want a protracted hearing and hopes for a verdict by December. That possibility should alarm the public. The House presumably did not frame the bribery article casually. Its committee conducted hearings, examined witnesses and documents, found probable cause and transmitted the article to the Senate as a formal accusation. Having done all that, prosecutors now appear ready to treat the accusation as dispensable, not necessarily because it has been disproven, but because presenting it could take too long.

4:04This raises an unavoidable question, if the charge was serious enough to impeach Sarah Duterte, how can it become unnecessary merely because December is approaching? Assuming the bribery article would do an injustice to Duterte herself. Once the House publicly accuses an official of bribery, the accusation becomes part of her political and historical record. She should not be left under the shadow of a charge that prosecutors themselves declined to prove, while being denied the formal opportunity to confront the evidence and answer the allegation fully. An accused official is entitled to a fair resolution of the charges formally brought against her. Prosecutors cannot place an accusation before the nation, damage her reputation, then abandon it for scheduling. If the evidence is weak, expose that weakness. If strong, present it. Abandoning the article would also be unjust to the public. The people were told that the House found probable cause to believe that bribery occurred. They are entitled to know what evidence supported that conclusion, how the defense answers it and what the Senator judges make of the competing claims. The public is owed a resolution, not an unfinished allegation.

5:07This is why impeachment cannot be understood solely as a mechanism for securing enough votes to convict. Institutionally, conviction on one article may be sufficient to remove and disqualify an official. Strategically, prosecutors may therefore believe that they should concentrate on what they consider their strongest case. But the constitutional trial has a purpose larger than prosecutorial strategy. It is also a process of public truth telling. It establishes an official record of what was alleged, what evidence was presented, what explanations were offered and what judgments were reached. That record belongs not only to the litigants, but also to citizens in history. The objective should therefore not simply be to find Sarah Duterte guilty of at least one article, assuming the evidence justifies conviction. It should be to discover the entire truth about all accusations solemnly approved by the House. A constitutional process diminished into vote counting may achieve removal, but it can still fail accountability. Public interest will naturally rise and fall. Some hearing days will command national attention, while others will seem technical, tedious

6:08or repetitive. Evidence often develops slowly. Military foundations must be established, witnesses examined, objections resolved in the defense herd. Truth is rarely packaged for primetime consumption. If waning interest becomes a reason to abbreviate proceedings, powerful officials gain an incentive to delay, distract and exhaust the public. Accountability would then weaken precisely because a case is complicated. The longer the paper trail and the more torturous the inquiry, the easier it would become to argue that citizens have stopped watching. The proper response to declining interest is not to sacrifice substance, but to improve public communication. Explain the issues clearly. Organize the evidence coherently. Avoid grandstanding, needless repetition and too much overjudicialization. Help citizens understand why each witness and document matters without pretending that constitutional truth must always be dramatic and clothed in legal ease. The Senate and the House prosecution panel should certainly respect time, but they must respect truth more. They should streamline the trial without amputating it, discipline the proceedings without prejudging

7:10them and pursue a timely verdict without imposing an artificial deadline that makes an entire accusation expendable. Sarah Duterte deserves the opportunity to answer every charge that the House formally lodged against her. The Filipino people deserve to hear those answers and judge the evidence. Whether the result is conviction or acquittal, the legitimacy of the outcome will depend on whether the process pursued the whole truth rather than the quickest ending. Impeachment is not a television show. The Constitution does not change the channel when ratings fall, and accountability should not adjourn because it's Christmas. The author is a professor at the Uploss Bonya School of Environmental Science and Management, UPLB Sassam, and vice chairman of the People's Television Network Inc. Fnee. You're either all in on this model or maybe you're building with another name. Are there speed or is it security? Or you're AWS AI? Don't pick a side. Pick them all. AWS AI is how? There are moments that reveal who we are and who were meant to become.

8:13For those born to lead, such moments call for a vehicle of equal distinction, dynamic by design, uncompromising and execution, the Range Rover Sport was engineered for those rare individuals who demand the world and possess the conviction to claim it. When your time to lead arrives, you need a vehicle that rises to meet it, the Range Rover Sport, exclusive offers available now. Explore further at RangeRover.com. This podcast is brought to you by Thompson Reuters. The best don't just do their work, they change what's possible. Case is won, audits completed, jobs saved. And every one of those moments is a professional who needed to get it right and did. Thompson Reuters builds the technology that sharpens insights, speeds up decision making, and powers the outcomes that matter. So when professionals act, the impact is felt by everyone. Be a change maker. Visit tr.com forward slash change makers.