About this episode
OA1103 - Is human intelligence necessarily more rational and just than artificial intelligence? How involved should AI be in our law and government? Professor Aziz Huq of the University of Chicago School of Law joins for a fascinating conversation about everything from the “right to a human decision” to the dystopian terrors of Tinder.
-
“A Right to a Human Decision,” Aziz Huq, Virginia Law Review (2020)
-
“The Geopolitics of Digital Regulation,” Aziz Huq (2024)
-
“Chinese scientists develop AI ‘prosecutor' that can press its own charges,” Steven Chen, South China Morning Post (2021)
Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!
Get every episode summarized
Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Opening Arguments
Most Lindsay Clancy Coverage Has the Law All Wrong
Opening Arguments
ICE Went Undercover To Expose a Vast Antifa "Conspiracy"
Opening Arguments
Supreme Court Says Why Prevent Trump Violating the Constitution Before It Even H...
Opening Arguments
Meta Must Pay, Bannon's Judge Pushes Back, and a Dolly Parton Shoutout from the...
Opening Arguments