OA753: Gonzalez v. Google: The Case That (Didn't) Break The Internet (feat. Corbin Barthold)
About this episode
Liz and Andrew break down the recent Supreme Court decisions in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh with help from Corbin Barthold.
Notes
Section 230 - 47 U.S.C. § 230
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
OA 698
https://openargs.com/oa698-will-clarence-thomas-break-the-internet-probably-not/
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]
Get every episode summarized
Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Opening Arguments
Most Lindsay Clancy Coverage Has the Law All Wrong
Opening Arguments
ICE Went Undercover To Expose a Vast Antifa "Conspiracy"
Opening Arguments
Supreme Court Says Why Prevent Trump Violating the Constitution Before It Even H...
Opening Arguments
Meta Must Pay, Bannon's Judge Pushes Back, and a Dolly Parton Shoutout from the...
Opening Arguments