
About this episode
Today's episode breaks down the (spoiler: ridiculous) defamation lawsuit filed by Tulsi Gabbard against Hillary Clinton for calling her (sort of) a "Russian asset." We do the patented Opening Arguments reading-the-complaint-backwards method (sort of) to figure out exactly what this means and what comes next.
We begin, however, with some instant response to the Saturday Republican "defense" of Trump in the impeachment proceedings. It's... well, it's a thing. Is Jay Sekulow still America's dumbest lawyer? (Hint: yes.) Learn the arguments that they're actually trying to advance, and why they're not actually a thing.
And again: please don't forget to CALL YOUR SENATOR! Remember, this is preposterously easy:
Call. (202) 224-3121.
CALL YOUR SENATORS, if you need help connecting to them, use
@resistbot. Text the word RESIST to the
bot on Messenger, Twitter, Telegram, or to 50409 on SMS. First time setup is quick, then calling both
should take 3-5 minutes.
Here’s what you say:
“I’d like to speak with Senator ____’s office. Hi, I’m _____, I’m a constituent, and I’m
calling to ask Senator ____ to vote in favor of allowing the Senate to subpoena
documents and witnesses in the impeachment trial. I don’t know how we can decide if Trump is
innocent or guilty without seeing all of the evidence. Thank you.”
Then, it's time to break down everything about Tulsi Gabbard's lawsuit. That means defamation law, Tulsi's lawyers, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, and much, much more. You'll be surprised to learn that Tulsi Gabbard's lawyers are... actual lawyers? But you'll also be surprised to learn some facts about them. Don't go all crazy conspiracy-theory on us, but... definitely listen.
After all that, it's time for the answer to #T3BE 163 involving contemporaneous notes and whether they're admissible as hearsay.
Appearances
None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at [email protected].
Show Notes & Links
- Check out Tulsi's defamation lawsuit here.
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]!
Get every episode summarized
Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Opening Arguments

Most Lindsay Clancy Coverage Has the Law All Wrong
Opening Arguments

ICE Went Undercover To Expose a Vast Antifa "Conspiracy"
Opening Arguments

Supreme Court Says Why Prevent Trump Violating the Constitution Before It Even H...
Opening Arguments

Meta Must Pay, Bannon's Judge Pushes Back, and a Dolly Parton Shoutout from the...
Opening Arguments