
newsSep 6, 202645:47pending
Mega Edition: Bryan Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The Arrest Warrant And Denial (9/6/26)
About this episode
Bryan Kohberger’s defense moved to suppress the Pennsylvania arrest warrant and the evidence that flowed from it, arguing that the warrant affidavit did not establish probable cause and that investigators had relied on a collection of weak or misleading inferences to connect him to the King Road murders. The defense attacked the significance of the white Hyundai Elantra, the cellphone records, the DNA evidence from the knife sheath and the broader timeline used to justify taking Kohberger into custody at his parents’ home. His attorneys argued that the affidavit overstated what the cellphone data could actually prove, leaned too heavily on vehicle identification evidence that had evolved during the investigation and failed to adequately account for weaknesses in the state’s theory. The motion sought to exclude the evidence obtained as a result of the arrest, including materials seized from Kohberger and subsequent searches that the defense characterized as fruits of an unlawful warrant.
Prosecutors responded that the defense was improperly dissecting the affidavit piece by piece instead of considering the totality of the evidence presented to the issuing judge. The state argued that investigators had assembled multiple independent strands pointing toward Kohberger: a vehicle consistent with his Elantra appearing repeatedly near the crime scene, cellphone activity that prosecutors said tracked with the vehicle’s movements before and after the murders, his connection to nearby Washington State University, and DNA evidence linking him to the knife sheath recovered beside one of the victims. Prosecutors maintained that probable cause did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt or an airtight explanation for every apparent inconsistency, only a fair probability that Kohberger had committed the crimes. They therefore argued that the arrest warrant was lawfully issued and that there was no basis to suppress the evidence gathered afterward.
to contact me:
[email protected]
Prosecutors responded that the defense was improperly dissecting the affidavit piece by piece instead of considering the totality of the evidence presented to the issuing judge. The state argued that investigators had assembled multiple independent strands pointing toward Kohberger: a vehicle consistent with his Elantra appearing repeatedly near the crime scene, cellphone activity that prosecutors said tracked with the vehicle’s movements before and after the murders, his connection to nearby Washington State University, and DNA evidence linking him to the knife sheath recovered beside one of the victims. Prosecutors maintained that probable cause did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt or an airtight explanation for every apparent inconsistency, only a fair probability that Kohberger had committed the crimes. They therefore argued that the arrest warrant was lawfully issued and that there was no basis to suppress the evidence gathered afterward.
to contact me:
[email protected]
Get every episode summarized
Each time The True Crime Tapes publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The True Crime Tapes

Mega Edition: The Family Of Ethan Chapin And Xana Kernodle Speak Out (9/13/26)
The True Crime Tapes
Sep 13, 202646:23completed

Mega Edition: Bethany Funke And The Discovery Of The Bodies In Moscow (9/12/26)
The True Crime Tapes
Sep 13, 202648:18completed

Mega Edition: Chad Daybell And The Murder Of JJ Vallow And Tylee Ryan (9/13/26)
The True Crime Tapes
Sep 13, 20261:04:39completed

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Interest In The Flight Patterns In New...
The True Crime Tapes
Sep 13, 202648:35completed