
Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 7-8)(3/7/26)
About this episode
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Parham complaint FINAL-3
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Diddy Diaries publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
555 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Diddy Diaries — Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 7-8)(3/7/26). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Victory Lane? Yeah, it's even better with Chamba by my side. Race to chambacacino.com, let's Chamba. No purchase necessary, VTW Group, voidware prohibited by law, CTNCs, 21 Plus, sponsored by ChambaCacino. What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Ditty Diaries. In this episode we're picking up where we left off with Ashley Params, amended complaint, naming Ditty, Druski, Odell Beckham, Jaguar Wright, and others. Second, cause of action. Violations of racketeer influence and corrupt organizations act Rico, conspiracy, U.S. Code 18, 1962, D, plaintiffs against all defendants. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, and realleges each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as they'll fully set forth and broad in this cause of action. Each defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in racketeering acts. Each enterprise member agreed to commit
the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in racketeering acts. Each defendant knew the general status of the conspiracy was to enable the cover and cover up defendant Ditty's decades worth of sexual abuse. Each enterprise member knew the general status of the conspiracy was to enable and cover up the Ditty's decades worth of sexual abuses. Each defendant member knew the conspiracy extended beyond their individual role. As set forth above each defendant, agreed and conspired to violate U.S. Code Section 1962C. Specifically, in an effort to enable, further protect, aid, secret, and cover up, each of defendant Ditty's sexual assaults, defendant Ditty's pattern and practice of sexual assault, kidnapping and abuse, and defendant Ditty's sexual battery against plaintiffs, defendants agreed to engage in each of the predicate offenses identified above. Defendants knew their predicate acts were a part of our pattern of racketeering activity
and agreed to the commission of those acts to further. The schemes described above constituting a conspiracy to violate U.S. Code 18, Section 1962C. In violation of U.S. Code 18, Section 1962D. Third cause of action, civil code, Section 170-08.5, sexual battery, plaintiffs against defendant Ditty, Shane, Odell, Druski, and Valdez. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, and realleges, each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants committed acts with the intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff. The sexually offensive and unwanted contact with plaintiff directly resulted from defendant's set acts. Defendant Ditty exploited his position of authority to intimidate, overwhelm, and subdue plaintiffs with the assistance of defendants, Shane, KK, Odell,
Brandy, and Druski. Objections to his conduct would have been met with retaliation. Defendant Ditty abused his position of power and authority over a plaintiff parham who was in no position to reject his sexual assault due to her being physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because she was drugged and kidnapped and having his cell phone and keys hidden from her. Defendant Ditty abused his position of power and authority over plaintiff John Doe who was in no position to reject his sexual assault due to him being physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because he was drugged and kidnapped and having his cell phone and keys hidden from him. Defendant Valdez abused his position of power and authority over plaintiff Jane Doe who was in no position to reject his sexual assault due to her being physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because she was drugged and kidnapped and having her cell phone and keys hidden from her. Defendant Ditty, Shane, Odell, and Druski's battery on plaintiff caused physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress,
pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done with malice, and or showed a deliberate willful wanton and reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Plaintiff claims compensatory and punitive damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. Fourth calls of action. California Civil Code Section 340.16, Sexual Assault, Plaintiff Parham, Against Defendants Diddy, Shane, Odell, and Druski. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and re-elegias each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below as though fully set forth and broad in this cause of action. Defendant touched an intimate part of plaintiff against her will for a sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or a sexual abuse. Defendants committed an act of sexual penetration against plaintiff's will by means of forced, drugging, violence, duress, menace,
or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to a plaintiff. Defendant's conduct placed plaintiff in a reasonable apprehension of bodily harm. Defendant's actions caused plaintiff to fear retaliation in the future and there was a reasonable possibility that defendant specifically, Defendant Diddy, could execute on a threat of retaliation. Defendant's assault on plaintiff caused physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done with malice, and are with a deliberate, willful, wanton and reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Defendant conspired to and did engage in a cover-up or attempted cover-up of previous instances of allegations of sexual assault by Defendant Diddy, newly enacted CCP 340.16. A effective January 1st, 2023, is a governing California state statute, extending the statute of limitations and granting revival of a plaintiff's claim
seeking to recover damages suffered as a result of a sexual assault that occurred on plaintiff. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. Fifth cause of action, California Civil Code section 51.9, sexual harassment, plaintiff param against Defendant's Diddy, Shane O'Dell and Drusky. Plaintiff incorporated by reference and reallege each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below as though fully set forth and brought in his cause of action. Defendants made sexual advances, solicitations, sexual requests, demands for sexual compliance by plaintiff, as well as engaged in other verbal, visual or physical conduct of sexual nature or of a hostile nature based on plaintiff's gender, all of which were unwelcome and pervasive or severe. Defendants intentionally, recklessly and wantonly acts resulted in harmful and offensive contact with the intimate parts of plaintiff's persons.
Defendant Diddy specifically used his authority to coerce and exploit Defendant Shane into learning plaintiff to his home so that Defendant Diddy could physically, psychologically and or emotionally through force manipulation, emotional abuse, intimidation, and retaliation, abuse plaintiff. These acts were done for Defendant Diddy's sexual gratification. Plaintiff has suffered economic loss or disadvantage and or personal injury, including but not limited to emotional distress as a result of Defendant's conduct. As a result of Defendant's unlawful conduct, plaintiff is entitled to actual damages and exemplary damages pursuant to California Code Section 52, subdivision B in an amount to be awarded at trial. Six cause of action, battery, plaintiff against all defendants, plaintiffs incorporate by reference and reallege each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as they'll fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants intended to commit and committed acts
of unwanted contact with plaintiffs, Defendant Diddy, Shane O'Dell and Drusky, committed an unwanted contact with plaintiff Parham in a harmful and offensive manner, including but not limited to by inflicting sexual abuse against plaintiff. Among other batteries, Defendant KK and Brandy abused plaintiff Parham without her consent and without equality. Defendant Pellate, Gonzalez, Valdez, Helena, and Jaguar committed unwanted contact with plaintiffs though in a harmful and offensive manner, including but not limited to by inflicting severe physical abuse against plaintiffs. Defendant Diddy committed, unwanted contact with plaintiff John Doe in a harmful and offensive manner, including but not limited to by inflicting sexual abuse against plaintiff. Defendant Diddy exploited his position and status to intimidate overwhelming subdued plaintiffs, any objections to his conduct would be met with retaliation, not only by plaintiffs, but by other defendants involved. Defendant Diddy abused his position of power and influence over plaintiff Parham and John Doe
who were in no position to reject his sexual advances. Defendant's batteries on plaintiff caused physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done with malice, and or showed a deliberate willful, wanton, and a reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Plaintiffs claim compensatory and punitive damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. Seventh cause of action, assault. Plaintiffs against all defendants. Plaintiffs incorporate, by reference, and reallege each of the preceding paragraphs, and all paragraphs below as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants intentionally attempted, threatened, and committed harmful in offensive contacts against plaintiffs, including but not limited to, inflicting sexual abuse and physical abuse against plaintiffs. Defendants conduct placed plaintiffs
in reasonable apprehension of bodily harm. Defendants assaults on plaintiffs caused physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done with malice, and or showed a deliberate willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Plaintiff claims compensatory and punitive damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. All right, we're going to wrap up right here, and in the next episode we're going to pick up with the eighth cause of action. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Capucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. Or if you prefer, you can find me on X at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that we discussed can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the Diddy Diaries.
In this episode, we're going to write back to that Ashley Parham amended complaint against Diddy, Druski O'Dell Beckham, Jaguar Wright, and others. Eighth cause of action, negligence, plaintiff Parham against defendant Shane. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the proceeding, and all paragraphs below is low, fully set forth, and brought in this cause of action. Defendant Shane invited plaintiff to his home as a guest. Defendant Shane owed plaintiff a right to expect protection from the other defendants, specifically defendant Diddy, while a guest at his home. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing, another checkered flag for the books, time to celebrate with Jamba. Jump in at JambaCasino.com. Let's Jamba. No purchase necessary, BGW Group, point where prohibited by law, CCNC, 21 plus sponsored by JambaCasino. As a direct and approximate result of the foregoing negligence, plaintiff was sexually harassed, assaulted, and abused by defendant's Diddy, Shane and those one and two,
causing plaintiff bodily injuries, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life. The losses are either permanent or continuing, and plaintiff will suffer losses in the future. Ninth cause of action, negligent failure to warn. Plaintiff against defendant Shane, KK, Pelletier, Gonzalez, Valdez, Odell, Drusky, Jaguar, Helena, Brandy, and those. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges to each of the proceeding, and all paragraphs below is though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants conduct created a risk of physical or emotional harm to plaintiffs. Defendants knew and had a reason to know that plaintiff Parham and John Doe were at risk of sexual assault and abused by defendant Diddy. Despite the knowledge of the danger, and the participation in the Diddy sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise, defendants did not alert plaintiff to the risk of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping, physical assault, rape, and or other attacks by defendant Diddy.
In fact, defendants facilitated and assisted defendant Diddy in his illegal DVN activities and despicable behavior. Defendant Pelletier represented he was lawfully transporting plaintiff those for the purpose of outstanding warrants. Defendant Shane specifically represented to plaintiff that she would be safe while guest in his home and would be free of risk of attack. Defendants had reason to know that plaintiffs would be unaware of the risk of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping, physical abuse, and cover-up enterprise. A warning to plaintiffs by any defendant that they were at risk of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping, physical assault, rape, and or other attacks by defendant Diddy or any other defendant would have reduced the risk of harm to plaintiffs. As a legal and direct result of the aforementioned conduct and omission of defendants, plaintiffs were sexually assaulted, harassed, kidnapped, physically assaulted, raped, and or otherwise attacked, and robbed of their dignity and personal safety. The depraved attacks on plaintiff caused plaintiff
to suffer serious psychological and physical harm from which she may never fully recover. As a direct and legal result of defendants' failure to warn plaintiff suffered damages both economic and general non-economic damages according to proof. Tenth cause of action, negligence supervision, and retention. Plaintiffs against defendant Diddy. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and read alleges each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below as though fully set forth and brought in his cause of action. At all times, material defendants were employed by defendant Diddy under the control and authority of defendant Diddy. Defendants were unfit or incompetent and posed a particular risk of sexually harassing, assaulting, and or mentally abusing plaintiff. Defendant Diddy knew or should have known that defendants, though Dell and Druski, had previously engaged and was continuing to engage in unlawful sexual conduct for his own personal sexual gratification. The defendant's unlawful sexual gratification
was not only that defendants were unfit or incompetent and posed a particular risk of sexually harassing, assaulting, physically, and or mentally abusing plaintiffs, but also that this unfitness created a particular risk to plaintiffs. Defendants unfitness and particular risk to plaintiffs Defendant Diddy knew or should have known that it was foreseeable that defendants, though Dell and Druski was engaging or would engage in elicit sexual activities with plaintiff under the cloak of the authority, confidence, and trust bestowed upon him through defendant Diddy. At no time during the alleged period, did defendant Diddy have in place a reasonable system or a procedure to investigate, supervise, and monitor defendants, though Dell and Druski to prevent sexual and verbal abuse, sexual assault, nor did he implement a system or a procedure to oversee or monitor conduct towards individuals that they encountered. Defendant Diddy conspired to and did breach as duties of care owed to plaintiff,
including by turning a blind eye and encouraging known abuses by defendants or Dell and Druski, and the known dangerous conditions of the Diddy sexual enterprise, and by continuing to expose individuals by plaintiff Parham and John Doe to these dangers for decades. Even though defendant Diddy knew or should have known of the sexual elicit activities by himself and defendants, though Dell and Druski, he failed to use reasonable care and supervising defendants, though Dell and Druski and did nothing to reasonably investigate, supervisor, monitor defendants, though Dell and Druski to ensure the safety of individuals they encountered. Defendant Diddy's negligence in supervising and or attaining defendants, though Dell and Druski was a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiff. As a result of the above described conduct, plaintiff has expended significant costs on therapy and suffered damages, including deprivation of income and benefits, loss of employment opportunities, severe physical and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, humiliation,
loss of enjoyment of life, and damage to a reputation and career. Plaintiff's compensatory and punitive damages herein and the amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdiction limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. 11 cause of action, intentional inflection of emotional distress. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants conspired too and did engage in conduct that was extreme and outrageous and intentionally caused severe emotional distress and plaintiffs. Defendants conduct exceeded all possible bounds of decency. Defendants acted with the intent and knowledge that plaintiffs suffered emotional distress due to their inexcusable and outrageous conduct. Defendants conduct caused plaintiffs to suffer physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional,
done with malice, and or showed a deliberate, willful wanton and reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Plaintiff's claim, compensatory and punitive damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other courts, which would otherwise have jurisdiction. 12 cause of action, negligent inflection of emotional distress. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants were negligent by both conspiring too and each breaching the duty of care that they owed to plaintiffs to keep her safe, and by breaching their duty to properly supervise and control defendants within the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Plaintiff suffered physical injuries, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life. Defendants negligence were a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs to suffer physical injuries, severe mental and emotional distress,
pain and suffering, mental anguish and the loss of enjoyment of life. 13 cause of action, unjust enrichment. Plaintiff against defendant Shane K.K. Pellete, Valdez, Brandy Drusky, Helena, O'Dell, Big Homie, C.C., Jaguar and those. Plaintiff's incorporate by reference and realleged each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendant Shane received significant revenue, specifically a new car for his betrayal and his involvement in plaintiff's assault, battery rape, false imprisonment and his role in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Defendants Pellete, Valdez, K.K., Brandy, Helena, Jaguar and those receive revenue in the form of cash payments for their involvement. In plaintiff, those assault, battery, false imprisonment and his role in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Other defendants named herein receive significant revenue for their involvement
in plaintiff's assault and their roles in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Defendants appreciate and have knowledge of such benefits and retain them to this day. Under principles of equity and good conscience, defendants should not be permitted to retain the profit they received and retain that plaintiff's expense while refusing to provide compensation for the injuries suffered by plaintiffs as a result of their unlawful conduct, as members of the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Plaintiffs seek restitution and or discordment of all money that they receive. Defendants, who have been in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise, are the ones who have been in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Defendants should not be permitted to retain the profit they received and retained at plaintiff's expense while refusing to provide compensation for the injuries suffered by plaintiffs as a result of their unlawful conduct and participation in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise alleged herein. Fourteenth cause of action,
aiding and abetting, plaintiff against all defendants. Plaintiffs incorporate, by reference, and reallege each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants knew that an assault and battery, sexual assault, was being committed, and the plaintiff's expense was not an unbattery sexual assault was being committed and was going to be committed against plaintiffs because of defendants involvement in the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Looking for excitement? Jamba Casino is here. Play any time, play anywhere, play on the train, play at the store, play at home, play with your board. Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for, don't delay? Jamba Casino is free to play. Experience social gameplay like never before. go to Chamba Casino right now to play hundreds of games, including online slots, bingo, slingo, and more! Live The Chamba Life at ChambaCasino.com Defendants provided drugs to be used to take advantage of plaintiffs without the knowledge
or consent of plaintiffs. Defendants' new plaintiffs have been and would be assaulted because of their involvement in the diddy's sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise. Defendants conduct was a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiffs. Through a four-mentioned axe, defendants caused plaintiffs an imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff's body and sexually offensive contact with plaintive resulted. As a result of defendant's conduct, plaintiff has suffered economic injury, plaintiffs' general, special, and consequential damages are in the amount to be proven at trial, but in no event is less than the minimum jurisdictional amount of this court. As a result of defendants above described conduct, plaintiffs have suffered and continues to suffer great emotional distress and was prevented and will continue to be prevented from performing daily activities and obtaining the full enjoyment of life. As described in this complaint, the defendant's conduct was done with oppression, fraud, and or malice, warranting significant damages,
including punitive damages. Here, plaintiffs were sexually assaulted by defendant diddy, Shane O'Dell, Drusky, Valdez, and though, at defendant chain's residence. Plaintiff was legally on the premises as a guest and an inviting of defendant's chain, defendant's chain through renting the premises had dominion and control over the premises where plaintiff was harmed. Defendant diddy had dominion and control over the actions of defendant's chain, O'Dell, Drusky, and though, and felt the step in and stopped them from sexually assaulting plaintiff Parham. As owner of the property, defendant Shane had a duty to protect plaintiff from the harm she suffered at the hands of defendant's diddy, O'Dell, Drusky, and though, and reached his duty when he failed to stop them from sexually assaulting plaintiff Parham. In furtherance of this breach, defendant Shane encouraged defendant diddy, O'Dell, Drusky, and though, to continue their assault on plaintiff. Plaintiff suffered immensely because of defendant Shane's intentional breach of his duty to her and plaintiff, those were battered sexually assaulted
and assaulted by defendant's diddy, Pelite, Gonzalez and Valdez at defendant's chain's residence. Plaintiffs were legally on the premises as they were kidnapped and forcefully brought there. Defendant Shane through renting the premises had dominion and control over the premises where plaintiffs were harmed. Defendant diddy had dominion and control over actions of defendant Shane, O'Dell, Drusky, Pelite, Gonzalez and Valdez and though fell to step in and stop them from assaulting and battering plaintiffs. As owner of the property, defendant Shane had a duty to protect plaintiffs from the harm they suffered at the hands of defendant's diddy, Pelite, Gonzalez and Valdez and reached this duty when he failed to stop them from battering and assaulting plaintiff, those. In furtherance of this breach, defendant Shane encouraged defendants to continue their assault on plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have suffered immensely because of defendant's chain's intentional breach of his duty to them. As a result of this breach of duty, plaintiffs have suffered and continued to suffer harm, including severe emotional distress, anxiety and
other consequential damages for which they are entitled to an award of monetary damages and other relief. Defendant's conduct described above was willful, wanton and malicious, at all relevant times. Defendants acted with conscious disregard for plaintiffs' rights and feelings, acted with the knowledge of or with reckless disregard for the fact that their conduct was certain to cause injury to plaintiffs and intended to cause fear, physical injury and or pain and suffering to plaintiffs. By virtue of the four-going plaintiffs are entitled to recover punitive damages. All right, we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we're going to pick up with the 15th cause of action. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobbi Kupuchi at protonmel.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmel.com. Or if you prefer, you can find me on X at B-O-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that we discussed can be found in the description box.
No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void were prohibited by law C-T's and C's. 21 plus sponsored by Chamba Casino.
More episodes
More from The Diddy Diaries

Former New Mexico AG Gary King Faces New Epstein Scrutiny (Part 2) (9/10/26)
The Diddy Diaries

Former New Mexico AG Gary King Faces New Epstein Scrutiny (Part 1) (9/10/26)
The Diddy Diaries

Mega Edition: Bryan Kohberger An The Bushy Eye Brow Motions (9/10/26)
The Diddy Diaries

Mega Edition: Bryan Kohberger And The Attempt To Use His Autism As A Defense (9...
The Diddy Diaries