Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 3-4)(3/6/26)

0:00You're having a good time, you're out drinking with the boys, now it's time to pay the tab. Well, there are court costs, attorney fees, higher insurance costs, damage to your car, do you why fines? Not to mention the damage to your social life, plan a sober ride or pay the price. Drinking and driving costs more than your drinks, it could cost a life. One more at What'sTheDamage.org, brought to you by Virginia DMV. What's up everyone and welcome back to another episode of the Ditty Diaries. Ashley Parham has filed an amended complaint against Ditty and she has named some pretty interesting co-defendants. And those co-defendants are Christina Koram, Shane Pierce, Ruben Valdez, John Pellete, Lodell Beckham, Jr., Drew Desbordes, aka Drusky, Jacqueline Wright, aka Jaguar Wright, Helena

1:00Harris Scott, Matthias Gonzalez, Brandy Cunningham, Janice Holmes, Keith Lux, aka Big homie C.C., and John and Jane Dose, one through ten. So let's dive into this document and see what Ashley Parham is talking about. Case number 3-24-cv-07191-RFL, amended complaint, demand for a jury trial. Introduction This case involves Rico Enterprise for the purpose of sexual assault, battery, rape, sexual abuse, false imprisonment, and kidnapping for the personal and financial benefit to the enterprise participants. Defendant Ditty has been sued by countless individuals for crimes similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint. Defendant Ditty is currently a federal inmate awaiting criminal trial for crimes similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint. Defendant KK is an employee of Defendant Ditty, often referred to by Defendant Ditty as

2:02his right-hand woman. Defendant Ditty's predatory behavior was constant and well-known by several individuals, including Defendant Ditty's employee, staff, friends, family, and associates. In fact, Defendant Ditty's sons are being sued for engaging in the same type of deviant behavior as their father, as pled in a Los Angeles Superior Court filing. Defendant Ditty was able to effectuate his crimes and evade capture and prosecution for his crimes for almost thirty years due to his position of power and influence in the entertainment industry. Defendant Ditty exploited his position and his relationship with powerful individuals to force sexual acts through exploitation, fear, manipulation, physical threats, emotional abuse, intimidation, and retaliation. Had any of the previous victims of Defendant Ditty have been taking seriously or had any of the better-us-reported Defendant Ditty's actions along forcement? Defendant Ditty's illegal and unfathomable behavior could have been prevented. Instead, Defendant Ditty was able to reign his abuse and terrorism on countless victims

3:06for over thirty years. Additionally, had Defendant Ditty's numerous business partners and associates not ignore Defendant Ditty's deviant behavior, Defendant Ditty would have been unable to continue his pattern of abuse over such a long period of time. As alleged herein, Defendant Ditty abused his position of power in the entertainment industry to garner loyalty and trust from the public at large and law enforcement, while instilling fear and intimidation in the hearts of his voluminous victims. Allegations against Defendant Ditty have been disregarded for decades, therefore creating a failure to protect victims like the plaintiff's name herein. Unlike most victims of Defendant Ditty who were employees, sex workers, or individuals seeking out Defendant's help to launch their careers, Plaintiff Parham does not fall into any of those categories. Plaintiff Parham met Defendant Ditty due to happenstance and still ended up being brutally victimized in a similar manner as described by the others who have preceded her filing and others who surely will follow including plaintiff Doe's herein.

4:11Plaintiff John and Jane Doe met with Defendant Ditty through their connections in the music industry as Plaintiff John Doe was a previous plaintiff against Michael Jackson for a sexual assault as a minor. Due to Defendant's agreements to participate in a corrupt enterprise, Plaintiff and countless other victims have been immeasurably impermanently harmed. Plaintiff alleged as follow upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their acts and experience, and as to all other matters, upon information and belief including investigations conducted by their attorneys. Parties Plaintiff Ashley Parham is an individual who resides in and domiciled in California. Plaintiff John Doe is an individual who is domiciled in Nevada and resides in another state purposefully to protect his safety and identity. Plaintiff Jane Doe is an individual who is domiciled in Nevada and resides in another state purposefully to protect her safety and identity. Defendant Combs is an individual who resides in and is domiciled in California.

5:12Defendant also loans a residence in Florida, however Defendant Ditty is currently an inmate at MDC in Brooklyn, New York. Defendant Cristiano Corham, Defendant KK, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in either California or North Carolina. Defendant Shane Pierce, Defendant Shane is an individual who resides in and is domiciled in California. Defendant Rubin Lyra Valdez, Defendant Valdez is an individual who resides and is domiciled in California. Defendant John Lawrence Pellate is an individual who resides in and is domiciled in Nevada or Hawaii. And Odell Beckham Jr. Defendant Odell is an individual who resides and is domiciled in Florida, previously referred to as John Doe and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint. Defendant Drew Disbordis, Defendant Drew Ski is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in either Maryland or Georgia, previously referred

6:13to as John Doe and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint. Defendant Jacqueline Wright, Jaguyer, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in California or Nevada. Defendant Helena Harris Scott, Defendant Helena, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in California. Defendant Matthias Golden Gonzalez, Defendant Gonzalez, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in Nevada. Brandy Klonenger, Cunningham, Defendant Brandy, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in his domiciled in Arkansas, previously referred to as Jane Doe in Plaint of Parham's original complaint. Defendant Janice Combs, is an individual who resides in his domiciled in Florida, Defendant Keith Lux, Defendant Big Homey C.C., is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in his domiciled in Nevada. Defendant Jan and Jane Doe's one through ten, Defendant Doe's one through ten,

7:16are individuals who, upon information and belief, reside in and are domiciled in various states, but mainly California. Jurisdiction, venue, timeliness, and California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act. This court has federal question, jurisdiction under 28 code, section 1331, and supplemental jurisdiction under US code 28, section 1367. For the state law claims alleged, this court has personal jurisdiction, overall defendants, because they have purposefully availed themselves, are residents of the state, and or were conducting business in California, in this lawsuit arise, out of the acts that occurred in California, and relates to their contracts and contracts in California. Further, the pervasive culture of abuse, including sexual assault, rape, inappropriate touching, and wielding power and control over plaintiffs were a constant presence when defendant Didi and the other herein named defendants engaged in the acts described herein. The location of all relevant events herein alleged occurred within the jurisdiction of California.

8:20Plaintiffs were harmed and injured in California by defendants. Venue is proper in this judicial district under US code 28, section 1391, B&C. Further, venue is proper in this judicial district, pursuant to US code 18, section 1965. This action is timely under federal racketeering influenced and corrupt organizations act. US code 18, section 1961, as the Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise, fraudulently concealed the ongoing sexual and deceitful activity, torts in conspiracy taking place within Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise. The Toyota Tundra and Tacoma are built to keep going, blending rugged muscle with precision engineering, all supported by Toyota's time-tested legacy of dependability. Step into a Tundra and feel the unyielding capability with the available iForce Max engine, Tundra puts out impressive power, torque, and towing performance, and the roomy high-tech cabin keeps you connected on the go. Or take a look at Tacoma made for drivers who push past the path.

9:23Agile, tough and relentless with available features like crawl control, portable JBL speaker, a power lift gate, so gear goes in fast and the adventure keeps moving. The Tacoma and Tundra are engineered to endure season after season, mile after mile. So drive one home today, visit toyota.com or stop by your local Toyota dealer to find out more Toyota. Let's go places. This action is also timely under California's sexual abuse and cover-up Accountability Act, California's sexual abuse and cover-up Accountability Act AB 2777, amended California Civil Procedure Section 340.16, extending the statute of limitations, opening up revival window for adult survivors of sexual assault and related claims and acknowledging that a two-year statute of limitations simply does not provide sexual assault survivors adequate time to heal from the physical and emotional trauma of sexual assault and prepare for a civil case. California Bill Analysis AB 2777-614-2022.

10:26When the perpetrator is someone of victim trust, it can take years for the victim even to identify what happened to them as sexual assault. For these reasons, it's self-evident that the unique nature of the emotional and psychological consequences of sexual assault, especially on women, can paradoxically permit wrongdoers to escape civil accountability unless statutes of limitation are crafted to prevent this injustice from occurring. Moreover, when these data are combined with widespread news reports of major companies being accused of covering up sexual assaults by their employees, it's self-evident that statutes of limitation for sexual assault need to be crafted in a way that does not cause the covering up company to enjoy the fruits of their cover-up solely because our statutes of limitation permit and thus motivate such behavior. Defendants fraudulent concealment through active attempts to cover up caused an ongoing trauma to plaintiff and caused her to suffer. Plaintiff Parham has repressed her experience until recently when defendant Didi was accused by

11:26his ex-girlfriend, former employee Cassie Ventura, and others regarding their experiences with defendant Didi. Accessing the civil justice system allows victims, survivors, and opportunity to seek accountability for the years of suffering caused by the abuse they experienced and a chance to take back the power they lost as a result of the sexual assault. Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe have been paralyzed in fear, have had to change their names, and frequently move from their residences for fear of being kidnapped, raped and abused, and assaulted by defendant herein. Plaintiff Doe's hereby invoke the pseudonym to protect their lives from the long reach of the Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise. Additionally, any statute of limitations, applicable to the below claims, if any, is told and defendants are e-stopped from raising such a defense as their actions describe below, deprive plaintiff of the opportunity to commence this lawsuit before now, as well as other equitable and legal bases. All right, we're going to wrap up part one right here, and in the next episode we're going to pick up with factual allegations, comment

12:29all accounts. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobbi Kupuchi at protonmail.com, that's bobbcapucci at protonmail.com, or if you prefer, you can find me on x at bobbuy underscore cappucci. All of the links that we discussed can be found in the description box. What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Didi Diaries. In this episode, we're going to pick up where we left off with the Ashley Parum amended complaint filed against Didi that added a whole bunch of people including Odell Beckham and Jaguar Wright and Druski. Factual allegations, comment all accounts, plaintiff Parum. Plaintiff met defendant Shane in February 2018 after an altercation with another man at a bar and defendant Shane came to plaintiff's rescue. While outside the bar with friends and other patrons, defendant Shane FaceTime video called defendant Didi and was showing people defendant Didi in the video on his phone, attempting

13:30to impress people with his famous friend. Defendant Shane then showed plaintiff defendant Didi on his video call, which plaintiff ignored, stating she was not impressed by him, knowing defendant Didi because she believed defendant Didi had something to do with the murder of rapper Tupac Shakur. Visible in the FaceTime call was defendant Didi and some of his children, including his sons Christian and Quincy. It appeared from plaintiff's perspective defendant Didi was having a get together at his home during the time of the FaceTime call with defendant Shane. Defendant Didi heard plaintiff statement and made a remark that plaintiff would pay for his statements regarding Tupac and overall dismissal of defendant Didi. On March 23, 2018, defendant Shane invited plaintiff over to his home to assist him with his cancer medications because he stated he was weak and unable to open his medication. Upon plaintiff's arrival, defendant Shane informed plaintiff that he wanted to give her a ride in his new car. Plaintiff and defendant Shane left his residence for a brief period and then returned.

14:32Once they returned, defendant Shane left the door to his apartment partially open and stated that the door was a jar because there was an issue with the door where it wouldn't close completely. Defendant Shane was renting an apartment on the lower floor of a home in Orinda, California. Defendant Shane had a separate entrance into his residence that led to the backyard of the home. The home also had a main entrance on Loma Vista Drive. Defendant Shane rented the home from a woman who lived in the upstairs portion of the home and had two dogs who resided with her. Plaintiff and defendant Shane then began to watch a movie and defendant Shane offered her a glass of water which he retrieved and brought back to plaintiff. All approximately 10 minutes after plaintiff and defendant Shane returned from their drive, defendant Diddy entered defendant Shane's residence. Defendant Diddy entered the home in a grand ready-to-party manner. His grandiose entrance was so loud that the dogs upstairs began barking. Defendant Diddy did not enter the home through the backyard entrance but instead through the main entrance. Along with defendant Diddy were his bodyguard defendant,

15:36big homie CC, defendant KK, defendant Brandy, defendant Doe 2, who upon information and belief is a friend of defendant Shane and Diddy and defendant Diddy's driver Doe 3, who remained outside in his vehicle during the duration of plaintiff's assault. Plaintiff believes defendant Shane invited her over to set her up to be assaulted by defendant Diddy because of the statement she made about defendant Diddy among prior. Upon defendant Diddy's arrival he immediately began to antagonize the plaintiff, stating that she thought that she would never see him in person, pay for her statements about two-pock during the video call, and defendant Diddy caught plaintiff. Plaintiff was in shock as she never believed that she would ever see her meet defendant Diddy in real life, let alone in the small apartment rented by defendant Shane. Defendant Diddy began advancing towards where plaintiff was sitting, on defendant Shane's bed with a knife, and held it to the right side of plaintiff's face, and threatened to give her a glass gal smile and retaliation for her previous statements on the video call. Defendant KK told Defendant Diddy

16:40that she did not think giving plaintiff a glass gal smile would be advantageous to their potential clients, who they could sell plaintiff for sex to. Defendant KK then made a threat to plaintiff that they could chipper off anywhere in the world, and that she would never see her family or anyone she knew ever again. Defendant Shane then partially on dress plaintiff then Defendant Diddy removed a remainder of plaintiff's clothing, removing the knife from her face, and then retrieved a bottle of liquid from a large fanny pack. Defendant Diddy then squirted a bottle of liquid on plaintiff, which placed her in fear that she was being squirted with a chemical substance like acid. Plaintiff soon realized the substance was an oil or lubricant, plaintiff was squirted, and this liquid substance all over the entirety of her naked body. Defendant KK then told by Defendant Diddy to insert what looked like a syringe from sterile packaging into plaintiff's vagina. Defendant KK did his hold while assisted by Defendant Brandy and then told Defendant Diddy that they were unable to use the IUD because it had prematurely been released from its packaging.

17:46Defendant Diddy upset by this took the syringe from Defendant KK and tried inserting it in plaintiff's vagina instead. Defendant KK and Diddy began to argue as Defendant KK continued to advise Defendant Diddy that since the IUD had been prematurely released from its packaging, it was no way they could insert it into plaintiff's vagina effectively. After some time Defendant Diddy heated the advice of Defendant KK and removed the syringe from plaintiff's vagina and handed it to Defendant KK. Defendant KK and Defendant Brandy then exited Defendant Shane's residence, leaving plaintiff alone with Defendant's Diddy, Shane and John those who had been named herein. Defendant Diddy then picked up a television remote that was near plaintiff and violently inserted it into plaintiff's vagina. Defendant Diddy while violently raping plaintiff with a television remote told plaintiff that her life was in his hands and that he wanted he could take her and she would never be seen again. Defendant began hysterically crying from the threats by Defendant Diddy along with the plan of being violently vaginally raped by Defendant Diddy

18:51with the television remote as well as the lingering pain from the ordeal with the IUD's syringe insertion. Defendant Diddy then instructed Defendant Shane to turn plaintiff on her stomach, seemingly tired of hearing the plaintiffs blood-curdling screams. Defendant Shane then grabbed plaintiff by her abdomen and hips, turned plaintiff on her stomach. Defendant Diddy then inserted Defendant Shane to put a pillow over her head because he didn't want to see her face or hear her cries and instructed Defendant Shane to annually rape plaintiff. Defendant Shane did as he was told by Defendant Diddy and began to annually rape plaintiff, Defendant Diddy then violently rape plaintiff annually after Defendant Shane. Defendant Do2 then joined Defendant Diddy and Shane taking turns annually raping plaintiff. Immediately after Defendant Do2 raped plaintiff, he exited Defendant Shane's residence. Defendant Diddy then instructed another Defendant Do2 to also rape plaintiff. Defendant Do2 has been determined to be Defendant Druski. Wow. That's some pretty powerful shit right there, huh?

19:57And Mr. Druski running around on the internet like some big shot. Now he's going to have to answer for this shit. Instead of immediately raping plaintiff Defendant Druski doused plaintiff with more oil lubricant and then jumped on top of plaintiff's naked body and oiled body treating it like a slip-in slide and knocking the wind out of plaintiff. Do2 is enormous size. Sorry, I can't help but laugh there. Do2 is enormous size. In other words, you big fat ass go to the gym. And for all of you people out there listening, stop making these people famous please. Stop making these fucking morons famous. The Toyota Tundra and Tacoma are built to keep going, blending rugged muscle with precision engineering all supported by Toyota's time-tested legacy of dependability. Step into a Tundra and feel the unyielding capability with the available iForce Max engine. Tundra puts out impressive power, torque and towing performance and the roomy high-tech cabin keeps you connected on the go. Or take a look at Tacoma made for drivers who push past the path. Agile, tough and relentless

20:57with available features like crawl control, portable JBL speaker, a power lift gate, so gear goes in fast and the adventure keeps moving. The Tacoma and Tundra are engineered to endure season after season, mile after mile. So drive one home today, visit toyota.com or stop by your local Toyota dealer to find out more Toyota. Let's go places. While defendant Druski was raping plaintiff defendant Didi sat in a chair near the bed and began masturbating while recording plaintiff's rape by defendant Druski. Another party's phone fell on the floor near plaintiff. Plaintiff then attempted to grab the phone but it slipped out of her hands and onto the floor due to the oil lubricant that had been doused all over her person by defendant Didi and Druski. Defendant Didi began laughing as plaintiff attempts to grab the phone throughout this violent gang rape defendant Didi made constant belittling remarks to plaintiff, including that he owned her now. At some point during this ordeal, plaintiff remembers defendant referring to another defendant though as Cornelius and remembered the name because it was so odd

22:00and unique. Plaintiff has come to discover that defendant Do Cornelius, who raped her, was defendant Odell. Plaintiff's body was becoming more and more limp over the course of the violent rape until eventually she had no control over her body nor could she move her body. When defendant Druski finished raping plaintiff, defendant KK entered the room to examine the condition of plaintiff who was barely able to move or control her bodily functions. Defendant KK examined plaintiff to see if she needed assistance and was about to give plaintiff an IV fluid. Plaintiff cannot be certain, is she did or did not receive such an intravenous intervention, defendant KK then opened a different bag, different than the one defendant Didi removed the oil from, where plaintiff observed several medicine bottles, IV fluid bags, and other unidentifiable powder-like drugs. Defendant KK then removed a pill from one of the medicine bottles and gave it to defendant Didi. Defendant Didi then inserted the pill on the plaintiff's mouth and down her throat to where plaintiff had no choice but to ingest the unknown pill. Defendant Didi, Shane, KK

23:05Odell and Druski then exited the residence to the backyard where they smoked marijuana and cigarettes. Plaintiff remained in an almost lifeless state and defendant Shane's bedroom until she finally regained her bodily functions. Plaintiff then began looking for her clothes and her purse that contained her car keys and cell phone but could not discover them in the room or anywhere in the apartment. Plaintiff was only able to find a t-shirt on the floor which he put on to cover her naked body. Plaintiff also observed a black condom wrapper on the floor of the bedroom which she assumed was used by one of the defendant's most likely defendant Didi during the rape. Plaintiff then found the knife with the assistance of dull plaintiffs and headed to the backyard where defendants were smoking as that was the only way to exit the premises onto the street. Plaintiff concealed the knife on her left side as she exited the apartment to the backyard area upon coming to the exit of the home which led to the backyard. Plaintiff was met by defendant Big Homey CC who was standing at the door between the residents and the backyard.

24:08By the time the plaintiff was able to compose herself and come to the backyard, defendant KK was no longer in the backyard but upstairs on the patio balcony with defendant Brandy. Defendant though allowed plaintiff to walk to the backyard where defendants were still smoking. Defendant though did not see the knife that plaintiff concealed on her left side as it was obstructed by the oversized t-shirt plaintiff was wearing. Plaintiff observed defendant Didi still partially nude from the assault while the other defendants had on their clothing. Defendant then left to the upstairs portion of the patio balcony where defendants KK and Brandy were already situated. Plaintiff then sat down on a makeshift seat in the backyard when defendant Didi noticed her presence and remarked that he was surprised she was able to walk because he had given her enough drugs to take out a horse. Plaintiff then asked defendant Didi what he gave her and he left and did not provide a response. Defendant Didi made further comments to plaintiffs in a jovial friendly manner asking her why they hadn't party together before because it was so much fun and he hadn't

25:13had any ask that tight in a while. Alright we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we're going to pick up where we left off and that's with defendant big homie CC. If you'd like to contact me you can do that at bobby kupuchi at protonmail.com that's bobbcapu cci at protonmail.com or if you prefer you can find me on x at bobby underscore capu cci. All the links that we discussed can be found in the description box.