
Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 1-2)(3/6/26)
About this episode
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Parham complaint FINAL-3
Get every episode summarized
Each time Beyond The Horizon publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
175 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Beyond The Horizon — Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 1-2)(3/6/26). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
The sun shining, birds are singing and all feels right in the world. Until the season changes and suddenly you lose your motivation to get out of bed. In fact, one in five people experience some form of depression no matter the season or time of year. At the American Psychiatric Association Foundation, our vision is to build a mentally healthy nation for all because we want you to live your best life and be your best you all year round. Please visit mentallyhealthynation.org to learn more. You're having a good time, you're out drinking with the boys, now it's time to pay the tab. $11,352.47, wait what? Well, there are court costs, attorney fees, higher insurance costs, damaged to your car, do you why finds? Not to mention the damage to your social life, plan a sober ride or pay the price, drinking and driving costs more than your drinks. It could cost a life. Learn more at What'sTheDamage.org, brought to you by Virginia DMV.
What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Ditty Diaries. In this episode we're going to pick up where we left off with Ashley Parum's amended complaint against Ditty and company. Defendant Big Home ECC then quip that defendant Ditty that he probably hadn't had any assetite because he's not used to having anal sex with women, which defendant Ditty and doe left at. Plaint Diff then told Defendant Ditty that she did not party with him and she did not enjoy partying with him and that he raped her. Defendant Ditty did not like plaintiffs' response to his lighthearted commentary and offered plaintiff money and instructed plaintiff to say that the violent rape was consensual and that plaintiff was a sex worker. Plaint Diff became enraged and yelled at Defendant Ditty that her rape was not consensual. She was not a sex worker and she refused to take any money from him and would tell the police that he raped her. Defendant Ditty then told plaintiff no one would ever believe her that she was raped by him and that she did tell anyone such that they would harm her family.
Defendant Big Home ECC then showed plaintiff his phone, which looked as if it was the outside of plaintiffs' estranged sister's residence as she could see her sister sitting on the couch and her sister's spouse on the balcony. It looked as if someone was outside the residence streaming the video to Defendant Big Home ECC's phone. Plaint Diff was rattled by what she was seeing on Defendant Big CC's phone and was still angry about being gang raped and was not complying with Defendant Ditty's request to take the money being offered to say the rape was consensual. Defendant Ditty then called Defendant Janice in an effort to further convince plaintiff not to report her assault. Defendant Janice yelled at plaintiff to not hurt her son, plaintiff told Defendant Janice that her son had violently raped plaintiff. Defendant Janice seemingly unfazed by this statement then continued her demands with plaintiff to take the money being offered and not to report the rape to law enforcement. Defendant Ditty then made further threats that he had gotten off from bigger crimes than this and referred to Tupac again after antagonizing plaintiff.
Defendant Big Home ECC then turned to Defendant Ditty and pulled his gun on him, asking him to repeat what he said in reference to Tupac. As the two of them were exchanging words, plaintiff went behind Defendant Big Home ECC where he was seemingly began to protect plaintiff. Defendant Big Home ECC then advanced to Defendant Ditty's questioning him over the comments he made about Tupac. During the commotion, a neighbor directly across the street came outside and peered into the backyard and asked what all the commotion was about. Defendant Big Home ECC then pointed a gun at the neighbor and instructed him to mind his business and return to his residence. Defendant Big Home ECC then turned the gun back on Defendant Ditty, plaintiff not far behind Defendant Big Home ECC tried to grab Defendant Big Home ECC's hand with that gun. The gun then went off and hit a hill behind Defendant Chains Residence. Defendant Ditty then ran up the backstone stairs near the hill in the backyard towards where Defendant's KK, Shannon Brandewer, plaintiff charged towards Defendant Ditty, moving the concealed knife from her left hand to her right hand and in pursuit of Defendant Ditty.
Plaintiff then pushed Defendant Ditty from behind while on the stone stairs causing him to fall on his back to plaintiff. Plaintiff then raised the knife in a rage from the events that just transpired and with the intent of driving the knife into Defendant Ditty's back when he turned around and began pleading for his life. Plaintiff shocked now to see Defendant Ditty acting as a victim, had a moment of clarity and then turned and ran down the stairs and outdoor stone staircase back out to the backyard to escape. Defendant Ditty then chased Plaintiff down the stairs and attempted to push her, but she was already at the bottom of the stairs and gained her footing and wielded the knife at Defendant Ditty's grazing his abdomen. Hearing the commotion Defendant KK and Brandew emerged and Defendant KK then began administering first aid to Defendant Ditty for the injuries caused by plaintiff. Plaintiff tried to make a quick dash for the exit, but it was thwarted by another Defendant D. After a period of time, Plaintiff was able to abscond from Defendant D. due to the first aid commotion with Defendant Ditty and was able to run down the street.
Once Plaintiff made it onto the street, she began yelling loudly for someone to call the police, Defendant D. who had now caught up with Plaintiff advised Plaintiff that she was an undercover cop. To this day, Plaintiff is unsure of the truth or falsity of that statement. The same neighbor then again emerged from his residence asking what was transpiring. Just as Plaintiff was attempting to answer, gunshots began being fired in Plaintiff's direction. Plaintiff led to a car near where the neighbor was also taken cover and lost sight of Defendant D. Plaintiff then heard an SUV screeching and speeding, leaving the residents. Plaintiff then entered the home of the neighbor who informed her that he had already called the police. Plaintiff informed the neighbor that it was Sean Combs, who had raped her and shot at them, but the neighbor was unaware of who Defendant Combs was. Shortly thereafter, a sheriff from the Contra Costa Sheriff's Department arrived at the neighbor's home. Plaintiff identified the person who arrived at the neighbor's home posing as a Contra Costa Sheriff was Defendant Pellate.
Plaintiff told Defendant Pellate, believing he was a sheriff from local police, she had been violently gangraped by Defendant D.D. and others, and that she did not have her clothes, phone, purse, car keys or cell phone. Defendant Pellate falsely posed as a Contra Costa Sheriff told Plaintiff and the neighbor that they had received several noise complaints prior to the neighbor's call and instructed Plaintiff to find a way to get home. The Sheriff Defendant Pellate did not offer to take Plaintiff home, nor did he call for emergency services, including an ambulance, nor any offer to take Plaintiff to the hospital, nor any offer to help Plaintiff recover clothes or effects from Defendant Chains residents. The Contra Costa Sheriff have confirmed that a police report was made that night by Plaintiff Farum, the Contra Costa Sheriff's have refused to release any information related to the complaint on the night in question to any source despite numerous attempts made via Freedom of Information Act. Plaintiff observed Defendant Pellate, and something to the neighbor, what looked like an envelope at the door as Defendant Pellate, exited, the neighbor went to the nearby room and quickly returned empty handed.
Plaintiff believed the envelope contained cash. The neighbor offered to let Plaintiff sleep on his couch until she could figure out a way to get her possessions and get home, but Plaintiff declined, uneasy, and unsure about the exchange with police, and the neighbor and police, and only remained at the neighbor's residence for a short period of time, once Defendant Pellate posing as a Contra Costa law enforcement left. Plaintiff then went back to Defendant Chains residence where she found the door open and her clothes were readily accessible in his residence. Defendant Chains then emerged as if nothing had transpired and offered Plaintiff to stay at his residence while she slept it off. Plaintiff asked for her purse and her keys but Defendant Chains told her she shouldn't leave in her condition and Plaintiff catatonic and in the state of shock and disbelief of the events that transpired, stated Defendant Chains home while Defendant Chains left the home. Later that morning Defendant Chains returned to the residence and woke Plaintiff up and finally gave her back her purse, cell phone and keys, and Plaintiff left Defendant's residence.
In a day's Plaintiff returned home and tried to make sense of what had happened to her. On March 26, 2018, Plaintiff contacted her primary care doctor and asked for an HIV and STD test in fear of possibly having contracted a disease from her violent rape. Plaintiff tried to continue her life as she felt she wouldn't be believed as Plaintiff already had told what she believed to be Contra Costa's Sheriff's Defendant, did he raped her to no avail? Further, Plaintiff was under the impression if she did continue to say Defendant did his name in relation to her assault, she would not be believed and her family would be in danger. Seemingly, mere days, maybe even the day before Plaintiff's vicious rape, Defendant Chains had miraculously began driving a new car, Plaintiff believed this was payment by Defendant Diddy for setting up Plaintiff to be raped. Plaintiff went to the hospital where the hospital conducted several tests on Plaintiff, including a rape kit, ultrasound and X-rays. Additionally, Plaintiff was given IV fluids to stabilize her vitals as she was in a severe weakened state from being unable to eat and losing a substantial amount.
While at the hospital, Plaintiff told members of her treatment team about her horrific assault and they contacted the Walnut Creek Police. Walnut Creek Police showed up to Plaintiff's hospital room and took a statement regarding her assault. Plaintiff only told Walnut Creek Police about the assault from Defendant Chains and Doe. Plaintiff believes her statements made to Walnut Creek Police while at the hospital was captured by police Bodycam footage. Plaintiff further believes her statements made on March 23rd immediately after her the vicious assault where Plaintiff named Defendant Diddy directly and by name may be captured by Bodycam footage but upon determining the sheriff was Defendant Pellate does not believe it was captured as he was a co-conspirator. Plaintiff filed her report to the Urindo Police Department on April 17, 2018 but was too afraid to name Defendant Diddy as one of her assailants. During this report, Plaintiff provided her clothing to the police from the night of the assault but they only retained her underwear.
To date the underwear was never returned and Plaintiff believed no investigation ever commenced. Plaintiff sought assistance from therapists in May 2018, one of which tried to have her therapy appointments covered by a victim's compensation fund which was rejected because Plaintiff was told no law enforcement agency had opened an active investigation into any of her many reports of her violent gang rapes. Subsequently, thereafter, Plaintiff asked police for a copy of her report from the Walnut Creek Police Department. On July 19, 2018, Plaintiff was provided a letter from the Walnut Creek Police Department stating that it was unable to furnish this information as it's confidential and not subject to public release despite Plaintiff not being the public and the victim can plaintiff. Alright, we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we're going to pick up where we left off and that's with in March 2024. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at bobbycupucci at protonmail.com, that's bobbcapucci at protonmail.com, or if you prefer you can find me on x at bobby underscore capucci.
All of the links that we discussed can be found in the description box. What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Diddy Diaries. In this episode we're picking right up where we left off with the Ashley Parum allegations against Diddy. In March of 2024, Plaintiff was re-traumatized by all the events surrounding Defendant Diddy including the several civil complaints filed against him, as well as the raid on Defendant Diddy's California and Florida residences. Plaintiff called Contra Costa Sheriff's again in hopes of renewing her previous complaint and amending it to ensure Defendant Diddy's name was included. Plaintiff received no response from the sheriff. Plaintiff in July 2024 then emailed the Chief of the Sheriff's Office regarding her complaint, lack of investigation, and how she was treated by the initial responding officer. Plaintiff then later received a call back from a detective, but then nothing further. Plaintiff then began seeking legal counsel for her claims ultimately being referred to undersigned for representation.
Under signed counsel also attempted to get a copy of the 2018 Police Report from Contra Costa Sheriff's, but was told that they would not provide the report or any other information without a subpoena. Plaintiff's John and Jane Does. Plaintiff's John and Jane Does are mother and son. Plaintiff were taken from their Las Vegas residents by Defendant Belite as they walked to their vehicle. Defendant Belite put a gun to Plaintiff John Does back and instructed him to get into a black SUV regarding extra-diting plaintiffs for warrants to California. Plaintiff did not have any warrants nor convictions. Plaintiff demanded to be shown the warrants and Defendant Belite refused and threatened to shoot Plaintiff if they protested further. In the back of the black SUV was Defendant Valdez. Defendant was unknown to Plaintiff at the time. Defendant was dressed in dark clothes and instructed Plaintiff not to look at him. Plaintiffs were then transported to what they believed was Defendant Belite's residence at Redacted Bay, Las Vegas.
Plaintiffs were ordered inside and brought into the living room and forced to sit on the couch and then were physically restrained. Plaintiff demanded to speak to their attorney, which was refused, ignored or met with threats of violence. It became obvious to Plaintiffs that this was not a legal arrest and that Palate was acting outside the color of law. At some point thereafter, Plaintiff were ordered back into the back of a large SUV. Defendant Gonzales was given the keys to Plaintiff's vehicle at an SUV to follow behind the SUV. Defendant Gonzales and Palate had a list which upon information and belief was a list of safe houses which they could allow parties, a safe respite, undetected. Defendant Pellate TA appeared to be in charge and he and Defendant Valdez were both given out orders to the other co-conspirator defendants. Plaintiffs overhear repeated conversations in the vehicle while being kidnapped and transported about following a protocol made by Defendant Pellate to others. Upon information and belief this protocol was agreed upon codes, including the use of communication apps like WhatsApp, Endor Snapchat, satellite phones,
and referring to other co-conspirator defendants by their middle names. It was apparent to Plaintiff this was a professional operations syndicate. Plaintiffs were then trafficked from Las Vegas to various locations throughout California. The first location Plaintiff was able to identify was a Danville, California. In the convoy the SUV Plaintiff was placed in also included Plaintiffs SUV that was driven by Defendant Gonzales. Upon information and belief Defendant KK was in another SUV part of the convoy. At some point Defendant Gonzales complained he had trouble keeping up with the convoy of black SUVs because the SUV ran poorly. Plaintiffs alleged the convoy drive was for numerous hours but the exact time was uncertain as they were unable to keep adequate track of time. The next location Plaintiffs were taken among the safe houses on their route to an unknown destination was, redacted way, Danville, California. Plaintiffs heard some altercation with the owners of the home not wanting to be involved with Defendant Scheme.
Plaintiff attempted to plead to the owners for help and could not understand why they wouldn't heed Plaintiff's cries for help. Plaintiffs heard the owners speak a foreign language which they believe was far sea. Upon information and belief this location was approximately 20 miles from the home in a window where Plaintiff Parham was assaulted. During the transportation of Plaintiff across state lines they were given water to drink, which Plaintiff believe was drugged. Defendant Valdez would provide Plaintiffs, though water, which after drinking Plaintiffs would feel slightly euphoric, dizzy and sick. Defendant Valdez would demand Plaintiff drink the water but they refused and or fake consumption. During the transportation Plaintiff was forced to listen to a device with music similar to a device associated with Defendant KK's nonprofit organization, Music Beats Hearts, in order to prevent Plaintiffs from ease dropping on the defendant's conversations. At certain times the music stopped playing and Plaintiff John, though, was able to get earbuds partially out of one ear without Defendant's noticing the ear conversations about the plans they had for Plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs were then taken to another location at Redacted Boulevard in El Serrito, California. Plaintiffs were able to keep track of their locations by remembering cross-treets when they were finally led out of the vehicle for stops. At this location Plaintiffs observed an RV arrive at the residence. During this stop, as one Plaintiff noticed Defendant KK was part of the convoy, at this stop Plaintiff overheard Defendant KK being referred to as her codename, believed to be her middle name Natasha, discussing visiting the UC Berkeley campus as Defendant Seam very familiar with the area and familiar with the city. Upon information and belief to this location was approximately seven miles from the home in Orinda where Plaintiffs were assaulted, Plaintiffs were then taken to another location at the Beacon Grand Hotel. Defendant Shane worked at the hotel as a manager. Plaintiffs were taken into the hotel through what appeared to be the side entrants by Defendant Valdez, Pelite and Gonzalez. Defendant Pelite told the co-conspirators defendants he would stay at a different hotel nearby so it wouldn't be linked to him.
Once inside the hotel room, Plaintiffs were beaten and drugged by Defendant Valdez and Gonzalez. Plaintiffs pleaded with Valdez and Gonzalez to release and for mercy. Defendant Valdez and Gonzalez instructed Plaintiffs to sign paperwork at gunpoint when Plaintiff refused Defendant Gonzalez would pistol with Plaintiff on the back of their heads. Defendant Gonzalez eventually gave Plaintiff a drink which caused them to pass out. Plaintiffs spent the night at the hotel with Defendant Gonzalez and Valdez taking turns watching them. The next morning, Plaintiffs were restrained and bound by their hands in front and were placed into a vehicle. Plaintiffs then saw Defendant's Jaguar in Helena. Upon information and belief, Defendant's Jaguar and Helena were in a small sedan-like color whiter beige. Plaintiffs were then transported to the location of Plaintiff Parham's brutal assault on Loma Vista Drive by Defendant Jaguar and Helena. Defendant Helena was the driver and Defendant Jaguar was the passenger.
Defendant Helena warned Plaintiffs if they tried to escape or run, that she would have to shoot you. Defendant Helena also warned Plaintiffs not to throw up in her vehicle, saying you better not throw up in my car or get sick. Defendant Helena mentioned having two partners as backup who were bounty hunters. Plaintiffs were familiar with Defendant Helena as she had filed a lawsuit against superstar singer Michael Jackson in 2005 and filed a creditor's claim against the Jackson estate upon his untimely demise in 2009. Plaintiffs were familiar with Defendant Helena from her previous Michael Jackson lawsuits and had previously met with Defendant in her home in West Hollywood to determine the credibility of her claims. And if they were similar in natural plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had reported Defendant Helena multiple times to the LA and OC FBI field offices for her role in the crime syndicate with Defendant's pelletade Valdez and other individuals. Plaintiffs attempted to make a conversation with Defendant Helena in which she admitted she was the same person who Plaintiffs had met with previously.
Defendant Jaguar aggravated stated, you let them know who you are, that's really great. Plaintiffs noticed Defendant had a large brown bag and Manila envelopes fully cash that was banded. It appeared they were separating large sums of cash to distribute as they were placing cash into Manila envelopes. Defendant Jaguar discussed that Defendant Helena, how the party started the first black-owned network. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs believed the network to be Revolt TV. Defendant Jaguar and Defendant Helena discussed the other co-conspirators but referred to them by their middle names. In Natasha, Defendant KK, Pedro, Defendant Gonzalez, Lyra, Defendant Valdez, Cornelius, Defendant O'Dell, and Larry Shorten for Lawrence, Defendant Peltier. The Defendant Jaguar said Cornelius is upset Defendant Helena who said that Defendant O'Dell and Druski were clients and nothing better happened to them and Plaintiff better not say anything about them or she would have Plaintiffs killed. Defendant Jaguar then told Plaintiffs they were being taken to meet John.
Plaintiffs now know that was referring to Defendant Diddy. When Defendants arrived at Plaintiff, at the Loma Vista location it appeared as they were awaiting and coordinating for others to arrive. A large sedan arrived and Plaintiffs were placed in the back with Defendant Valdez, Defendant Peltier was driving. Plaintiffs then arrived at a short driveway or curb. Plaintiff remembers looking for intersecting street signs at this location and found redacted a dead end street off of the Loma Vista Drive. Plaintiff John Doe repeated the name of the street to himself so he remembered and was able to whisper into Jane Doe's ear to remember the intersecting street name redacted. Plaintiff believed that this was a home that they would be murdered in and tried to devise a plan for escape. Plaintiffs were brought into the house and into the kitchen where they were watched by Defendant Gonzalez. Plaintiff repeated their pleas to Defendant Gonzalez to be released and for mercy which you replied, there's nothing he can do.
Plaintiffs could hear other people inside the home and tried to listen to understand what was happening which included a woman's scream. Eventually, Plaintiffs were led deeper into the home where they encountered more individuals including Defendant Diddy. Alright, we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we're going to pick up where we left off. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Capucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. Or if you prefer, you can find me on X at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that we discuss can be found in the description box.
More episodes
More from Beyond The Horizon

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger And The Subpoena He Sent To Bethany Funke
Beyond The Horizon

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Sealed Indictment (Part 2) (9/6/26)
Beyond The Horizon

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Sealed Indictment (Part 1) (9/6/26)
Beyond The Horizon

Leon Black And The Motion To ID His Accuser (Part 2) (9/6/26)
Beyond The Horizon