Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 1-2)(3/6/26)

0:00Well, some fools, men of the J.U. So here from the WWE. When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch. And that means it's Chumba time. With hundreds of Casino style games and new titles arriving weekly, there's always something fresh to try at Chumba Casino. The daily booze make it even more fun. And have me, bout to get them all during my downtime. Ready for a fun way to chill out and enjoy a few minutes for yourself? Let's Chumba. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs. 21 Plus sponsored by Chumba Casino. What's up everyone and welcome back to another episode of the Ditty Diaries. Ashley Parham has filed an amended complaint against Ditty and she has named some pretty interesting co-defendants. And those co-defendants are Christina Quorum, Shane Pierce, Ruben Valdez, John Pellate, O'Dell Beckham Jr., Drew Desbordes, AKA Drew Ski, Jacqueline Wright, AKA Jaguar Wright, Helena Harris Scott, Matthias Gonzalez,

1:02Brandy Cunningham, Janice Combs, Keith Lux, AKA Big Homey C.C. And John and Jane Doe's one through 10. So let's dive into this document and see what Ashley Parham's talking about. Case number three-24-cv-07191-RFL. Amended complaint. Demand for a jury trial. Introduction. This case involves Rico Enterprise for the purpose of sexual assault, battery, rape, sexual abuse, false imprisonment and kidnapping for the personal and financial benefit to the Enterprise participants. Defendant Ditty has been sued by countless individuals for crime similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint. Defendant Ditty is currently a federal inmate awaiting criminal trial for crimes similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint. Defendant KK is an employee of Defendant Ditty, often referred to by Defendant Ditty as his right-hand woman.

2:03Defendant Ditty's predatory behavior was constant and well-known by several individuals, including Defendant Ditty's employees, staff, friends, family and associates. In fact, Defendant Ditty's sons are being sued for engaging in the same type of deviant behavior as their father has pled in a Los Angeles Superior Court filing. Defendant Ditty was able to effectuate his crimes and evade capture and prosecution for his crimes for almost 30 years due to his position of power and influence in the entertainment industry. Defendant Ditty exploited his position and his relationship with powerful individuals to force sexual acts through exploitation, fear, manipulation, physical threats, emotional abuse, intimidation and retaliation. Had any of the previous victims of Defendant Ditty been taking seriously or had any of the better as reported, Defendant Ditty's actions, a law enforcement, Defendant Ditty's illegal and unfathomable behavior could have been prevented. Instead, Defendant Ditty was able to rein his abuse

3:04and terrorism on countless victims for over 30 years. Additionally, had Defendant Ditty's numerous business partners and associates not ignored Defendant Ditty's deviant behavior, Defendant Ditty would have been unable to continue his pattern of abuse over such a long period of time. As alleged herein, Defendant Ditty abused his position of power in the entertainment industry to garner loyalty and trust from the public at large and law enforcement while instilling fear and intimidation in the hearts of his voluminous victims. Alligations against Defendant Ditty have been disregarded for decades, therefore creating a failure to protect victims like the plaintiff's name herein. Unlike most victims of Defendant Ditty who were employees, sex workers, or individuals seeking out Defendant's help to launch their careers, Plaintiff Parham does not fall into any of those categories. Plaintiff Parham met Defendant Ditty due to happenstance and still ended up being brutally victimized in a similar manner as described by the others who have preceded her filing and others

4:06who surely will follow including Plaintiff those herein. Plaintiff John and Jane Doe met with Defendant Ditty through their connections in the music industry as Plaintiff John Doe was a previous plaintiff against Michael Jackson for a sexual assault as a minor. Due to Defendant's agreements to participate in a corrupt enterprise, Plaintiff, and countless other victims have been immeasurably and permanently harmed. Plaintiff alleged as follow upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their acts and experience and as to all other matters upon information and belief including investigations conducted by their attorneys. Parties. Plaintiff Ashley Parham is an individual who resides in and domiciled in California. Plaintiff John Doe is an individual who is domiciled in Nevada and resides in another state purposefully to protect his safety and identity. Plaintiff Jane Doe is an individual who is domiciled in Nevada and resides in another state purposefully to protect her safety and identity. Defendant Combs is an individual

5:07who resides in and is domiciled in California. Defendant also owns a residence in Florida. However, Defendant Diddy is currently an inmate at MDC in Brooklyn, New York. Defendant Cristiano Chorum, Defendant KK is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in either California or North Carolina. Defendant Shane Pierce, Defendant Shane is an individual who resides in and is domiciled in California. Defendant Rubin Lyra Valdez, Defendant Valdez, is an individual who resides and is domiciled in California. Defendant John Lawrence Pellate is an individual who resides in and is domiciled in Nevada or Hawaii. Defendant O'Dell Beckham, Jr. Defendant O'Dell is an individual who resides and is domiciled in Florida. Previously referred to as John Doe and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint. Defendant Drew Disbordis, Defendant Drew Ski, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in either Maryland or Georgia,

6:11previously referred to as John Doe and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint. Defendant Jacqueline Wright, Jaguyer, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in California or Nevada. Defendant Helena Harris Scott, Defendant Helena, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in California. Defendant Matthias Golden Gonzales, Defendant Gonzales, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in Nevada. Defendant Brandi Klonenger, Cunningham, Defendant Brandi is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in is domiciled in Arkansas, previously referred to as Jane Doe and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint. Defendant Janice Combs, is an individual who resides and is domiciled in Florida, Defendant Keith Lux, Defendant Big Home ECC, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides and is domiciled in Nevada. Defendant John and Jane Doe's one through 10,

7:14Defendant Doe's one through 10, are individuals who, upon information and belief, reside in and are domiciled in various states, but mainly California. Jurisdiction, venue, timeliness, and California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act. This court has federal question, jurisdiction under 28 code, section 1331, and supplemental jurisdiction under US code 28, section 1367. For the state law claims alleged, this court has personal jurisdiction, overall defendants, because they have purposefully availed themselves, are residents of the state, and or were conducting business in California, in this lawsuit arise, out of the acts that occurred in California, and relates to their contracts and contracts in California. Further, the pervasive culture of abuse, including sexual assault, rape, inappropriate touching, and wielding power and control over plaintiffs, were a constant presence when defendant Didi, and the other herein named defendants, engaged in the acts described herein.

8:14The location of all relevant events herein alleged, occurred within the jurisdiction of California. Plaintiffs were harmed and injured in California by defendants. Venue is proper in this judicial district under US code 28, section 1391, B and C. Further, venue is proper in this judicial district, pursuant to US code 18, section 1965. This action is timely under federal racketeering influenced and corrupt organizations act, US code 18, section 1961, as the Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise, fraudulently concealed the ongoing sexual and deceitful activity, towards inconspiracy taking place within Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise. This action is also timely under California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act, California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act, AB 2777, amended California Civil Procedure section 340.16, extending the statute of limitations,

9:15opening up revival window for adult survivors of sexual assault and related claims and acknowledging that a two-year statute of limitations simply does not provide sexual assault survivors adequate time to heal from the physical and emotional trauma of sexual assault and prepare for a civil case. California Bill Analysis, AB 2777, 614, 2022. When the perpetrator is someone of victim trust, it can take years for the victim even to identify what happened to them as sexual assault. For these reasons, it's self-evident that the unique nature of the emotional and psychological consequences of sexual assault, especially on women, can paradoxically permit wrongdoers to escape civil accountability unless statutes of limitation are crafted to prevent this injustice from occurring. Moreover, when these data are combined with widespread news reports of major companies being accused of covering up sexual assaults by their employees, it's self-evident that statutes of limitation for sexual assault need to be crafted

10:17in a way that does not cause the covering up company to enjoy the fruits of their cover-up solely because our statutes of limitation permit and thus motivate such behavior. Well, so, foos, men of the J.O. sole here from the WWE. When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch. That means it's chumba time. With hundreds of casino-style games and new titles arriving weekly, there's always something fresh to try at chumba casino. The daily booze may get even more fun and have me about to get them all during my downtime. Ready for a fun way to chill out and enjoy a few minutes for yourself? Let's chum. No purchase necessary. VGW Group voidware prohibited by law, CTs and Cs, 21 plus sponsored by chumba casino. Defendants fraudulent concealment through active attempts to cover up caused an ongoing trauma to plaintiff and caused her to suffer. Plaintiff Parham has repressed her experience until recently when defendant Diddy was accused by his ex-girlfriend, former employee Cassie Ventura and others regarding their experiences with defendant Diddy. Accessing the civil justice system

11:18allows victims, survivors and opportunity to seek accountability for the years of suffering, caused by the abuse they experienced and a chance to take back the power they lost as a result of the sexual assault. Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe have been paralyzed in fear, have had to change their names and frequently move from their residences for fear of being kidnapped, raped and abused and assaulted by defendant herein. Plaintiff Doe's hereby invoke the pseudonym to protect their lives from the long reach of the Diddy sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Additionally, any statute of limitations applicable to the blow claims, if any, is told and defendants are e-stopped from raising such a defense as their actions describe below, to pry of plaintiff of the opportunity to commence this lawsuit before now as well as other equitable and legal bases. All right, we're going to wrap up part one right here and in the next episode, we're going to pick up with factual allegations, comments, all counts. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobbi Kupuchi at protonmail.com.

12:19That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. Or if you prefer, you can find me on X at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that we discussed can be found in the description box. What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Diddy Diaries. In this episode, we're going to pick up where we left off with the Ashley Parum amended complaint filed against Diddy that added a whole bunch of people including Odell Beckham and Jaguar Wright and Druski. Factual allegations, comment, all counts, plaintiff Parum. Plaintiff met defendant Shane in February 2018 after an altercation with another man at a bar and defendant Shane came to plaintiff's rescue. While outside the bar with friends and other patrons, defendant Shane FaceTime video call Defendant Diddy and was showing people Defendant Diddy in the video on his phone, attempting to impress people with his famous friend. Defendant Shane then showed plaintiff Defendant Diddy on his video call,

13:20which plaintiff ignored, stating she was not impressed by him, knowing Defendant Diddy because she believed Defendant Diddy had something to do with the murder of rapper Tupac Shakur. Visible in the FaceTime call was Defendant Diddy and some of his children, including his sons, Christian and Quincy. It appeared from plaintiff's perspective, Defendant Diddy was having a get together at his home during the time of the FaceTime call with Defendant Shane. Defendant Diddy heard plaintiff statement and made a remark that plaintiff would pay for his statements regarding Tupac and overall dismissal of Defendant Diddy. On March 23, 2018, Defendant Shane invited plaintiff over to his home to assist him with his cancer medications because he stated he was weak and unable to open his medication. Upon plaintiff's arrival, Defendant Shane informed plaintiff that he wanted to give her a ride in his new car. Plaintiff and Defendant Shane left his residence for a brief period and then returned. Once they returned, Defendant Shane left the door to his apartment partially open and stated that the door was a jar

14:21because there was an issue with the door where it wouldn't close completely. Defendant Shane was renting an apartment on the lower floor of a home in Orinda, California. Defendant Shane had a separate entrance into his residence that led to the backyard of the home. The home also had a main entrance on Loma Vista Drive. Defendant Shane rented the home from a woman who lived in the upstairs portion of the home and had two dogs who resided with her. Plaintiff and Defendant Shane then began to watch a movie and Defendant Shane offered her a glass of water which he retrieved and brought back to plaintiff. All approximately 10 minutes after plaintiff and Defendant Shane returned from their drive, Defendant Diddy entered Defendant Shane's residence. Defendant Diddy entered the home in a grand, ready-to-party manner. His grandiose entrance was so loud that the dogs upstairs began barking. Defendant Diddy did not enter the home through the backyard entrance, but instead through the main entrance. Along with Defendant Diddy were his bodyguard, Defendant Big Home ECC, Defendant KK, Defendant Brandy,

15:23Defendant Do2, who upon information and belief is a friend of Defendant Shane and Diddy and Defendant Diddy's driver, Do3, who remained outside in his vehicle during the duration of plaintiff's assault. Plaintiff believed Defendant Shane invited her over to set her up to be assaulted by Defendant Diddy because of the statement she made about Defendant Diddy among prior. Upon Defendant Diddy's arrival, he immediately began to antagonize the plaintiff, stating that she thought that she would never see him in person, pay for her statements about two-pock during the video call and Defendant Diddy caught plaintiff. Plaintiff was in shock as she never believed that she would ever see her meet Defendant Diddy in real life, let alone in the small apartment rented by Defendant Shane. Defendant Diddy began advancing towards where a plaintiff was sitting on Defendant Shane's bed with a knife and held it to the right side of plaintiff's face and threatened to give her a glass-gall smile and retaliation for her previous statements on the video call. Defendant KK told Defendant Diddy

16:23that she did not think giving plaintiff a glass-gall smile would be advantageous to their potential clients who they could sell plaintiff for sex too. Defendant KK then made a threat to plaintiff that they could chipper off anywhere in the world and that she would never see her family or anyone she knew ever again. Defendant Shane then partially on dress plaintiff then Defendant Diddy removed the remainder of plaintiff's clothing, removing the knife from her face and then retrieved a bottle of liquid from a large fanny pack. Defendant Diddy then squirted a bottle of liquid on plaintiff, which placed her in fear that she was being squirted with a chemical substance like acid. Plaintiff soon realized the substance was an oil or lubricant, plaintiff was squirted and this liquid substance all over the entirety of her naked body. Defendant KK then told by Defendant Diddy to insert what looked like a syringe from sterile packaging into plaintiff's vagina. Defendant KK did his told while assisted by Defendant Brandy and then told Defendant Diddy that they were unable to use the IUD

17:25because it had prematurely been released from its packaging. Defendant Diddy upset by this took the syringe from Defendant KK and tried inserting it in plaintiff's vagina instead. Defendant KK and Diddy began to argue as Defendant KK continued to advise Defendant Diddy that since the IUD had been prematurely released from its packaging, it was no way they could insert it into plaintiff's vagina effectively. After some time Defendant Diddy heated the advice of Defendant KK and removed the syringe from plaintiff's vagina and handed it to Defendant KK. Defendant KK and Defendant Brandy then exited Defendant Shane's residence, leaving plaintiff alone with Defendant Diddy, Shane, and John Doe's who had been named herein. Defendant Diddy then picked up a television remote that was near plaintiff and violently inserted it into plaintiff's vagina. Defendant Diddy while violently raping plaintiff with a television remote told plaintiff that her life was in his hands and that he wanted he could take her and she would never be seen again.

18:27Plaintiff began hysterically crying from the threats by Defendant Diddy along with the plan of being violently vaginally raped by Defendant Diddy with the television remote as well as the lingering pain from the ordeal with the IUD's syringe insertion. Defendant Diddy then instructed Defendant Shane to turn plaintiff on her stomach, seemingly tired of hearing the plaintiffs blood-curdling screams. Defendant Shane then grabbed plaintiff by her abdomen and hips, turned plaintiff on her stomach. Defendant Diddy then inserted Defendant Shane to put a pillow over her head because he didn't want to see her face or hear her cries and instructed Defendant Shane to anally rape plaintiff. Defendant Shane did as he was told by Defendant Diddy and began to anally rape plaintiff, Defendant Diddy then violently rape plaintiff anally after Defendant Shane. Defendant Doe too then joined Defendant Diddy and Shane taking turns anally raping plaintiff. Immediately after Defendant Doe to rape plaintiff, he exited Defendant Shane's residence.

19:28Defendant Diddy then instructed another Defendant Doe to also rape plaintiff. Defendant Doe has been determined to be Defendant Druski. Wow. That's some pretty powerful shit right there, huh? And Mr. Druski running around on the internet like some big shot. Now he's gonna have to answer for this shit. Instead of immediately raping plaintiff, Defendant Druski doused plaintiff with more oil lubricant and then jumped on top of plaintiff's naked body and oiled body treating it like a slip-in slide and knocking the wind out of plaintiff due to his enormous size. Ha ha, sorry, I can't help but laugh there. Due to his enormous size, in other words, you big fat ass go to the gym and for all of you people out there listening, stop making these people famous please, stop making these fucking morons famous. While Defendant Druski was raping plaintiff, Defendant Diddy sat in a chair near the bed and began masturbating while recording plaintiff's rape by Defendant Druski. Another party's phone fell on the floor near plaintiff. Plaintiff then attempted to grab the phone

20:29but it slipped out of her hands and onto the floor due to the oil lubricant. That had been doused all over her person by Defendant's Diddy and Druski. Defendant Diddy began laughing as plaintiff attempts to grab the phone. Throughout this violent gang rape, Defendant Diddy made constant belittling remarks to Defendant Druski including that he owned her now. At some point during this ordeal, plaintiff remembers Defendant referring to another Defendant Doe as Cornelius and remembered the name because it was so odd and unique. Plaintiff has come to discover that Defendant Doe Cornelius who raped her was Defendant Odell. Plaintiff's body was becoming more and more limp over the course of the violent rape until eventually she had no control over her body nor could she move her body. When Defendant Druski finished raping plaintiff, Defendant KK entered the room to examine the condition of plaintiff who was barely able to move or control her bodily functions. Defendant KK examined plaintiff to see if she needed assistance and was about to give plaintiff an IV fluid. Plaintiff cannot be certain.

21:30Is she did or did not receive such an intravenous intervention? Defendant KK then opened a different bag, different than the one Defendant Diddy removed the oil from where plaintiff observed several medicine bottles, IV fluid bags, and other unidentifiable powder-like drugs. Defendant KK then removed a pill from one of the medicine bottles and gave it to Defendant Diddy. Defendant Diddy then inserted the pill on the plaintiff's mouth and down her throat to where a plaintiff had no choice but to ingest the unknown pill. Defendant Diddy, Shane, KK, Odell and Druski then exited the residents to the backyard where they smoked marijuana and cigarettes. What's up, fools? Man of the J. O's all here from the WWE. When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch. That means it's chumba time. With hundreds of casino-style games and new titles arriving weekly, there's always something French to try at chumba casino. The daily booze make it even more fun and have me about to get them all during my downtime. Ready for a fun way to chill out and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?

22:31Let's chumba. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs. 21 Plus sponsored by chumba casino. Plaintiff remained in an almost lifeless state and defendant-chains bedroom until she finally regained her bodily functions. Plaintiff then began looking for her clothes and her purse that contained her car keys and cell phone but could not discover them in the room or anywhere in the apartment. Plaintiff was only able to find the t-shirt on the floor which he put on to cover her naked body. Plaintiff also observed the black condom wrapper on the floor of the bedroom which he assumed was used by one of the defendants, most likely defendant diddy during the rape. Plaintiff then found the knife with the assistance of doe plaintiffs and headed to the backyard where defendants were smoking as that was the only way to exit the premises onto the street. Plaintiff concealed the knife on her left side as she exited the apartment to the backyard area upon coming to the exit of the home which led to the backyard. Plaintiff was met by defendant Big Home ECC

23:32who was standing at the door between the residents and the backyard. By the time the plaintiff was able to compose herself and come to the backyard, defendant KK was no longer in the backyard but upstairs on the patio balcony with defendant Brandy. Defendant doe allowed plaintiff to walk to the backyard where defendants were still smoking. Defendant doe did not see the knife that plaintiff concealed on her left side as it was obstructed by the oversized t-shirt plaintiff was wearing. Plaintiff observed defendant diddy still partially nude from the assault while the other defendants had on their clothing. Defendant Shane then left to the upstairs portion of the patio balcony where defendants KK and Brandy were already situated. Plaintiff then sat down on a makeshift seat in the backyard when defendant diddy noticed her presence and remarked that he was surprised she was able to walk because he had given her enough drugs to take out a horse. Plaintiff then asked defendant diddy what he gave her and he laughed and did not provide a response. Defendant diddy made further comments to plaintiffs

24:33in a jovial friendly manner asking her why they hadn't partied together before because it was so much fun and he hadn't had any ask that tight in a while. All right, we're gonna wrap up right here and in the next episode we're gonna pick up where we left off and that's with defendant big homie CC. If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at bobbykopucci at protonmail.com that's bobbyscapuccci at protonmail.com or if you prefer, you can find me on x at bobbys on your score, C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All the links that we discussed can be found in the description box. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Victory Lane? Yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side. Race to ChumbaCasino.com, let's Chumba. No purchase necessary, VTW Group, voidware prohibited by law, CT and Cs, 21 plus, sponsored by ChumbaCasino. Csino, Taller Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Victory Lane, yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side.