Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 8, 202648:03

Media Exposed with Adam Weiss - March 8, 2026

About this episode

Media Exposed with Adam Weiss - March 8, 2026

A - Adam and Ari Ackerman talk MAGA voices breaking with Trump on Iran strikes

B - Adam and David Burck talk Rubio and the Press on Iran and Israel

C - Adam and Jonathan Keller discuss California's Parental Rights win and more

D - Adam talks about Trump and the White House Correspondents Dinner

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Real America’s Voice publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

973 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Media Exposed with Adam Weiss - March 8, 2026

Real America’s Voice

0:00
48:03

Full transcript

Real America’s VoiceMedia Exposed with Adam Weiss - March 8, 2026. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Welcome to Media Explosive. We're going to take a look at the war broke out. How's the media covering it? And how's the media covering the Maggar Civil War that's happening in the conservative media? We're also going to take a look at the White House correspondence that Trump said he's going. This is the first time in his six years being president. He's going to attend this. I'd like to call the nerd prom. We're also going to take a look at this story coming out. DHS Secretary was fired over the weekends. Also, we're going to take a look at the California ruling that happened in the Supreme Court. That war coming up on media exposed. What they do say is fake news. That's how devious the media has become. They're full force activists now. They colluded. Trump folks were in on it.

Sways elections. Sways policy. We need to expose them. Republicans trash the consulate. I've been doing this since I was 18. I've had hit jobs done against me. I've been attacked by media reporters. I afraid now's truth will prevail. Fake news media. We here to call you out. Head into the unknown. Media exposed with Adam Wise starts now. Welcome back to Media Exposed as we were all kind of shocked. President Trump sent our forces. Most of our air force, Navy, into battle into Iran, started the war with the help of Israel last Saturday. In alliance, it seems like a lot of people on the right

to make what I like to call the media. They're saying the other media is called the mega civil war. It has been anti-war. It's a little bit anti-Israel. Why is this? Trump directly contradicts his own secretaries. Insisting that he may have forced Israel's hand. So the media jumped on that too, because you believe the Iranian lunatics will strike America first. Yet the Pentagon briefers told Congress there was no intelligence in that claim. So media wants to jump on top of this instead of making war here. I want to make my first guess. Ari Ackerman, social media guru, influencer on entrepreneur. Ari, thanks for joining us again. Thank you. Thanks for having me, guys. This is such a unique topic yet, because it's not just... We always talk about the regular media that's usually anti-Israel. I'm not taking the side of Israel. I'm always taking the side of what you're saying. You're pressed. But now you've got this mega media, which I don't know what happened to them lately. It looks like the last two years,

they've kind of like tilted a lipboard towards such anti-Israel. I don't know what you want to call them. But before we jump, and I want to show you this, one cut, I'm kind of shocked that here, but it's what's just one cut cut, one in Megan Kelly. I think what I get goes anti-Israeli. Watch this one. There are massive divisions over what we've done here. And people are going to change their minds over the coming days and weeks one way or the other. But my own feeling is no one should have to die for a foreign country. I don't think those four service members died for the United States. I think they died for Iran or for Israel. I think I understand how this helps Iran perfectly well. I get it. I mean, I hope long term we'll see. But they seem rather jubilant. 80% of the country does not support the Ayatollah. He was a terrible, terrible man. No one's crying that he's dead. No normal person. But our government's job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It's to look out for us.

And this feels very much to me, like it is clearly Israel's war. Mark Levin wanted it. It's his war. Ben Shapiro, Lindsey Graham, Miriam Madelson. That's obvious. All right. I like Megan, you know, but I think she's so locked because let me and you probably might have the same thing. I got so many Persian Iranian friends in New York City, Long Island, ex-girlfriends, too. Not one I know is, you know, supportive of the regime of the Ayatollah. Everyone is so happy and jubilated. Give me a thought. I'm like, mega media, especially Megan is pushing this narrative. I don't know what's happening to Megan Kelly, the Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson. It really feels like they're being paid by a foreign entity the way they're describing this war, the way they're describing Trump's decision to go to war. Can you imagine somebody bullying Trump? Is that the most ridiculous comments of all time to go to war, the man who tried to avoid wars?

Now all of a sudden they're saying that the Iranians and the Israelis, the ones pushing him to war. It's so outrageous. Everybody who's an Iranian in this country is supportive of this war. Everybody who's an Iranian in Iran is supportive of this war. If the Ayatollah, if the Iranian regime acquired a nuclear weapon, it would have been the end of the world as we know. It's that simple. This is an American interest to make sure that the Iranian regime did not acquire a nuclear weapon. This is not a war. For anything else, for protecting America's interests, both here and abroad. And we all hate that service members would kill. Nobody wants Americans to leave them. Nobody wanted Americans to fight in Germany, World War II, when we had to go in to end the Nazi regime. But this is the same situation. Sometimes you have to put troops in harm's way to protect your world interests. And that's what's going on around you. And I don't know why Megan and Candace,

especially, and Tucker, I mean, they lost their mind completely. And there's a push that we're all these crazy feminists that stand in Colombia, and a pro-Palestinian, and not supportive of all these women that have to work around with their faces covered, their jobs, not a lot of jobs, not a lot of people themselves. Where are they, right? The feminists. These people who are on the left, especially who protest. And I do too, by the way, who are in support, obviously, of women's rights, gay rights. Everybody wants equal rights, except when it comes to apparently this regime in Iran, when they're on the side of the oppressors. To me, the mindset here, it's almost like you're rooting for the terrorists. I don't really get why that's acceptable in their liberal mindset. It doesn't make any sense to me. It really makes a way to explain to me how they can be supportive

of the regime, yet wanting for rights for all. It's my bottom. It's a combination. It's two entities that the left hate so much. Israel and Trump. These guys can solve cancer, create, you know, turn the world into the most beautiful peaceful place, and they'd still find the way to disagree with them. I want to show you another giant. And why we talk about these giants are, because they're not just maggot, they're big media figures. So with their voices going anti-Trump here, anti-war, it's going to hurt the, I think it's going to hurt the GOP. In the midterms, they don't keep this coalition, but Tucker Carlson, he's really off the fringe lately, but let's watch this cut. He says, there's a push to hate all Muslims. I know where you get this from, but watch this cut too. We got mass Muslim immigration after 9-11, and the people who pushed it, because I was here, and I remember it very well, are the very same people, in some cases, literally the same people, who are now screaming about how Islam is our enemy. And in this case, it's in the service of the darkest of all ends,

which is to divide this country against itself, along religious lines. And yet people are standing up and saying something and never would have said 20 years ago, hate all Muslims. How is that better than hate all Jews? I'll pause while you explain. And of course they can't explain, because it is in no sense better than I hate all Jews. It's the same thing. And I hate all Christians for that reason, matter. But you are seeing a concerted effort to do that. And you will almost certainly see, as we have seen before, acts of violence that may or may not be organic, designed to move public opinion, strongly in one direction to benefit people outside our country. It's just a fact. Sorry, I don't know what you've told me, because every time there's a Muslim incident, you don't even know it's a Muslim, because they hide it. And every time there was a big Muslim incident, we'd bend over backwards to say, it's not the Muslims, they're all peaceful. So tell me what you think of his thoughts are they hate all Muslims. I don't see it to you.

I agree with them. Nobody should hate all Muslims. Nobody should hate all Jews. Nobody should hate all Christians. That's not what's being portrayed, or we hate people that hate America. And whether they're Muslim, Jew, or Christian, it doesn't matter to me. If they're not supportive of America, they're not supportive of our interests here of being proud of Americans, of living within this society, within the American society. Those are the people that, you know, we feel threatened by, not be a specific religion, but that's not, you know, and if anybody's trying to divide us, it's stuck or crossing by even saying these things, by trying to provoke this absurd narrative that it's people just wanting to hate Muslims. That's not the case. I have many Muslim friends. I love the Muslim people. I love the Jewish people. I love the Christian people. I love anybody that loves us back. That's my philosophy. I know it's many possibilities. I think people's philosophies who are activists and who are out there as well. I have so many Muslims, friends in New York, South Florida.

I don't know what he's talking about. I don't see any big push to hate all Muslims. We take it as we see it. We take, you know, wars as we see it. But what do you think? How long do you think this war is going to continue? And give me a thoughts on this. How long do you think we should stay in that? And what's the end result going to be here? Hopefully we have no boots on the ground. Thank God. Yeah. I mean, you know, that's a question for the ages, right? We hope it's a short war. We hope it doesn't involve any loss of life. I mean, further loss of life. But I think the stated goal here is to have the Iranian regime change. And I think the key player here is the Iranian people, because the civilians of Iran, who Trump keeps saying, now stay inside. But when the bomb stop falling, you have your moment in time now, to revolve through, you know, create some sort of civil war or try and put the leadership in place that makes sense for the Iranian people. And so they're the ones that are going to have to make the change here. I mean, the Americans and the Israelis would be initial push to get rid of the leadership

is the start. The Iranian people need to finish this off. Everybody follow Ari. Everybody follow Ari. Where do people follow you on Instagram? He's got a great Instagram with some great videos. Thank you. My name is Ari Ackerman. And my Instagram is ariiacgr. So I appreciate it. Everything. Ari, thanks for joining us. I'll see you soon. Thank you again. Thanks for having me. I'm always good to see you. Coming up, all things Trump. He's joining the White House correspondents. Then it is here. But next, what's the real deal with the Iran attacks? We're going to take a look at that and how the media is going. That more coming up on media exposure.

Welcome back to Media Expose. We're tragically with this war break. And we lost a few US servicemen. But that's just going to happen in the state of war. Right? So Trump and Rubio were telling a little bit of different stories early in the week. Rubio said we struck the Israel. Was going to act anyway. And we'd suffer casualties because Israel was going to act anyway. Trump said he forced Israel's hand because Iran was about to attack us first. I don't know if it can be true. The administration's own Pentagon briefings told congressional step. There was no intelligence that Iran was planning a preventive strike on us or Israel directly undercutting Trump's data justification first. Rubio's candid admission. We knew Israel was going to strike. Was a gift to every American media outlet. And critical August that the US is serving Netanyahu's agenda. Not America, America first. Not our national security for interest. Netanyahu himself publicly roasted.

Public arose in this war is something he had yearned to do for 40 years. He said, which raises serious question. Who strategic objectives is the US. Israel. Who we serving here when your secretary of state and your president give opposite explanations. For why we went to war on the same day the American people deserve clarity. Of course, especially as US casualties mountain Congress has been consulted. I want to welcome my ex guest David Burke. David's a Republican candidate right here in West West Palm Beach area for congressional district 22 in Florida. He's a former Marine, former police officer here. David, thanks for joining us first time on media expose. Thank you. Thank you for having me. David, I mean, it's so much happening in the news. But I think, you know, I was there. Actually, you told me you were there too. You know, I saturday at Maralago. The war the day the war broke out. It was like a makeshift war room. The rubia was in run room. With cough was walking around.

The weather wasn't great. So I business look socialized success to go on. And they took the dining room and they put it in the living room. People don't know. And there was this glorious living room. Maralago with tables of people of members. And the president sliding around is nothing like it. I think in the world. You were there. You took a nice vote with the president. Got to talk to him a little bit, right? Yeah, it was it was a pretty momentous occasion. I guess you could say. I mean, you're sitting. Living history as it occurs. And, you know, something to say suggests that President Trump's hand was forced. Is utterly ridiculous. No one's going to force President Trump's hand. Let's get that. Let's iron that out and clear that out now. But let's look at this. Let's look at kind of everything that's happening with Iran. You know, President Trump's had a consistent message effectively. I mean, what he did with was it's so a mommy back in 2020. Right? Taking him out. Extremely precise. They said that that was going to start World War III. Didn't start World War III. Further proving Iran's a paper tiger.

Now what he's doing and with what Israel. United States and Israel doing what they do and taking out the Iranian regime. This has been so long in the making. And when you look at this from a strategic global perspective, what he did with Venezuela in the amount of heavy crude that's going to China. When you look at Iran and which with the amount of crude that goes to China, this is all a part of a what I suspect to be President Trump's sort of five-piece has vision as he takes out these bad actors. It impacts bricks. It impacts Russia. It impacts Iran. Obviously the largest state sponsor of terrorism. And it impacts China at the end of the day. Who is our global adversary? And while this is going on, we have a lot. It's not just the whole. We got a middle of a war. And when the Secretary of Defense beat Hexat out the press briefing early in the week. Then you got like I want to show you this. Let's show this photo. Brian Stelter's clip. I'm tweet actually this morning. Brian Stelter said this morning.

Pete Hexat suggested that the press probably cover a service member casualty to make the president look bad. An incendiary claim that injected partisan politics into wartime Pentagon press conference. And then he went on to say most of the questions of the Pentagon briefing came from right-wing outlets. Like the Daily Wire, Lindell TT that have little experience covering the military. Hexat did field a question from the BBC. Though he's seen to pick a reporter based on the tie the reporter was wearing. Look, this is Brian Stelter. No, one of his media show on CNN failed and was kicked off because if you can't see Brian. If you can't see the lens that other outlets are allowed to report the news when the media had this monolithic hold triangle hold on what we saw as news all the time. And it was one way always. It was one thought. One think tank. One thought. It was always from the left. So thank you. You know, give me a thoughts on that tweet.

I just read from Brian Stelter that other outlets are allowed to be in the briefing now. Well, the media, I mean, they completely delegitimize themselves back and you know leading up to the 2016 election with Russia gate. You know that whole collusion that hoax that was propagated by intelligence officials more over widespread throughout the media than when there was any redaction. It's a little footnote. It's not an honest sincere earnest apology that they're reporting with shoddy. So rightfully so you know the kind of questions that are going to come from from the left leaning media. And it's not going to be really relevant to the topic of to the topics at hand. So Brian Stelter should sit in the corner and he should take his punishment and and that said. I think it was a legendary broadcast. A Russian limbal was once a pen pal with used to call it a drive-by shooting something like that. That's what the media does. They'll just go by and destroy somebody's career, destroy somebody. And none of it's true right after a few weeks or a few months.

They're like, there's a little foot. Oh, we did correct it. But it's on page 842. Upper right hand side. Right. Where the hell's reading page? Who the hell's going to page 842? You destroyed the guy's career. And that's what they typically do the media. And that's the M.O. And I'm glad the administration is fighting back by putting other outlets and then other sources in there to deliver in the news. I want to show you this cut. But there's Rubio the day after they start. See how they started these fights. Rubio said one thing, Trump said another thing to really doing this just for Israel. Anything to cause conflict back in the day. These military leaders, etc. So what put on pedestals. There were heroes doing such amazing things for the world. What's cut three? How he smacks down the CNN reporter. Cut three Rubio. No, but you have to read if you're going to read the whole site. Your quote is about we knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that would precipitate attack. Yeah, I understand. But listen, all right. Let me understand that. That's what that. But I had a very specific question from that gentleman, right?

The president said. The president said. Hold on a second. I asked the very first Israeli. But let me answer because this is my press conference. Okay. The you asked me. I was asked a very specific question. So you guys can mirror up his representative, but I was asked a very specific question yesterday. The bottom line is this. We, the president determined we were not going to get hit first. It's that simple, guys. We are not going to put Americans troops in harm's way. If you tell the president of the United States that if we don't go first, we're going to have more people killed and more people injured. The president's going to go first. That's what he did. That's what the president will always do. He will always put the safety and security or a men and women in uniform and of all Americans. Before anything else, he's always going to do that. And that's what he did here. In addition to that, I would argue that this threat from Iran. They are hiding behind these missiles and hiding behind these drones. They wanted to reach a point where you couldn't touch them. And then they could do whatever the hell they wanted with their nuclear program. And there was no way in the world that this terrorist regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump's watch. So the U.S. attack is not going to do with Israel. Well, that's going to do with Israel. I don't think anybody gets in the secretary of state.

And that's what he advised at the same time. Brilliant. What do you think of Rubio's handling of that media, like from CNN, who's trying to get his gotcha moment? I mean, I mean, Secretary Rubio was put on a persistently and consistently as put on a masterclass all the way back to his center of confirmation hearing in that speech. He has handled himself beyond reproach. I think he's handled the seat beyond reproach and he's 100% right. We know President Trump hates waste. He hates war. That is not his MO. But if we were put in a reactionary position, we were put on the defense, we would have been obviously more than likely caught off guard. But we needed to get the drop. We have the technology. And you know, what Venezuela proves moreover what Iran proves is, you know, the disastrous Biden withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, the world was laughing at us. And please remember that the world was laughing at us. They thought the American military is weak and feckless. We are not a weak and feckless nation.

Our American war fighters, I will take them on the field of battle 10 times out of 10. But when you have politicians who are aloof and apathetic and they don't care, you got to, you got to understand the difference between the political side of the things and then the war fighter. We have the best war fighters. We have the best technology. We've defeated the Chinese technology. We've defeated Russian technology. And we are letting the world know that the days of the Biden and Obama administration apathy are, they're done. We are the world's superpower. We will operate in that capacity. But we will also operate in the capacity from an American first perspective. We used to have such honor when we put our generals and military and leaders on, you know, showcase them. Nowadays they're looking for conflict. They're losing. The media is just looking to cause a wedge between people. I remember General Shortkov during the elder Bush during the Iraq war. And he was General Shortkov, right? And he was like this brilliant general of the things, right? And what about, and we have this brilliant guy general, Kane.

But nothing from the media trying to throw his fights between Rubio and Trump, Kane. It's like, why don't we showcase these military men? They did such an amazing job. And I'm sure if it was under Obama, how do you think they would treat them totally different? What do you give me your thoughts? The only way the media is going to lionize our generals is if they're pushing woke leptus, the woke leptus agenda throughout our armed service. That's the only way they're going to lionize these guys. But real, we're fighting generals. The media wants nothing to do with it because it doesn't further push the weakening of America and the weakening of the West as a whole. Yeah, right. There's very few reporters out there, journalists that are alpha. They really want to put our men down and not have warriors. They have to tell people where they can find you and support your campaign. But Congress that are already it's no way they can, you know, support you. You can find my Instagram at Berk4FL that's B-U-R-C-K-F-O-R-F-L. And then you can find me on davidberg.com.

David, thanks for joining us. I'll see you soon. Good luck in the campaign. Thank you. Thank you. The Supreme Court injects some sensibility into California. Which, what did they rule on? It's a big issue in America. We're going to take a look at that more coming up on media exposure. Welcome back to Media Explorers. Early in the week, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark six three win

for parental rights in California, ruling that California cannot secretly gender transition children at school without notifying or obtaining consent from their own parents. The court found California's policy likely violates both the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and the due process laws of the Fountain Amendment. Because parents, not the state, have primary authority over their children, upbringing, and the court's own words. California's policy cut out the primary protectors of children's best interests. They're parents. This is the significant parent parental rights ruling in general. This ruling exposed a broader radical agenda states like California have been actively concealing children's gender transition from their own families, compelling teachers to see parents and hiding behind bureaucratic expertise to override parental authority. This is far from over. A related case already headed to the high court that could permanently, permanently establish constitutional protections for parents, nationwide, and shut down this kind of state

overreach for good. No, told the Senate that the EHS will get to that later. What about, I said Jonathan Calla, he's the family counsel research director, I believe Jonathan, right? Jonathan? Yeah, California family counsel president, California family counsel. Sorry about that. Jonathan, I cannot believe this case, even the sixth three. To think such a lunacy thing that you went to work kids to school, they're thinking of transitioning at a young age, and we don't have the parents. Did I told you this story a decade ago, 15 years ago, you also, you were saying that that's even being talked about and yet we lived through it. How long did we live through that in same apology two, three years? Thankfully, we have some sanity, but like I said, I cannot believe three certain court disagree with it. I mean, where do we find people like this? Give me a thoughts on the ruling, and I guess congratulations, because you guys have a big fight is in this ruling, right? Absolutely. Yeah, this has been an incredible case, the Mirabelli case.

Yeah, it's still working its way through the ninth circuit here to mop up the final pieces of it, but we are so grateful for the Supreme Court and the sixth conservative justices who have stepped forward and said, yeah, we absolutely need to make sure that we are protecting parental rights. And it really is shocking to me that you would have any individual justices dissenting to this. I mean, several of them are parents themselves. I know at least I think the time you ran Jackson, Justice Jackson as a parent. And it is shocking to me that anybody could look at this and say that if a child goes offsite away from their parents, they go to a school and the parents are trusting that the school is going to be not replacing that parental authority, not taking over that parental authority, but they are going to be complementing and supporting parental rights. The idea that you would be having these schools keep literally two sets of books, one that they share with the parents and the other one that is confidential that they use to transition

these kids. It's absolutely beyond the pale. I know. If I, in days we grew up, if you did that parents would be screaming, throwing you out there, you'd do this and there would be some common sense and the teacher would be fired. The principal would be fired. Guidance could be fired, but we've lost sense of common sense that they're running around the policy that got promoting by radical agendas, especially in California. You got Hollywood that's in favor of this. Smut immediate makes this side, but thankfully we have some sanity there. And what age groups was this that they were allowing this from what age to what age was this policy in effect? It was every school district in California, public school district, am I correct? That we're allowing teachers to not tell their parents. That's essentially the case. And it's even worse because not only did was this a relic of something that was an oversight. Literally in the last several years, California passed a new law, maybe 1955, that actually demanded that individual school districts could not pass their own individual policies to protect parental rights.

Again, not only were they saying we're not going to pass a statewide policy to protect them, Newsom and the legislators in Sacramento banned individual school districts from trying to protect parents. In fact, Governor Newsom himself went so far as on his personal Twitter account to threaten with lawsuits and legal action and withholding funding multiple school districts who were only trying to say we think parents have a right to know something. And in our school district, we're going to try to protect them. And yet, Gavin Newsom put the power of his office on the line and said we're going to come down on you like a ton of bricks. If you even step out of line and if you think you're going to go behind the backs of our Department of Justice, of our Department of Education, and I think one thing that I will say about this, number one, this is an absolute victory for every parent and family in the case. It's an absolute victory for every family and child in the state of California.

But I'll also say this should be an absolute victory for the people of the United States, because you mentioned sanity in any sane world, any voter, even Democratic voters who are looking at their ballot for 2028. And they are considering whether or not they want to give Governor Gavin Newsom a promotion to the presidency. They should take a look at this and realize this absolutely disqualifies him from ever holding any elected office ever again. But they don't care. I mean, I saw Newsom, he looked like a fool. He was on Jimmy Kimmel last night. And he'll go to one of the audience like he's doing some part, his own podcast. And he had Charlie Kirk on, he'd ban it on and he's talking all moderate. Like I don't know these radical things. And he just says anything to anybody's face, whatever audience is, he tells them what they want to hear. But as you said, the people that are so radical on the left, and the politicians have just gone along, instead of being, instead of pushing back against the radicals,

the radicals on the left and the media on the left, they just go, go with it, the politicians. And I want to show you a clip that sums it up because this was early in the week and I want to show you this cut five. And Congressman Mace had Governor Walz, and it was about the fraud in Minnesota. But what's the simple question? And he can't even answer it. Let's go to cut five. Let's go to Governor Walz. And I hope you learned some lessons from your last hearing with me on the oversight committee. Have you learned anything? I did that if I didn't speak up to what my people would be dead, Congresswoman, and I warned you. Okay, Ms. Governor Walz, what is a woman? Did you learn that lesson? Do you know what a woman is? I'm the Governor of Minnesota, Congresswoman. Do you know what a woman is? I'm not here to be your property obsession. Okay. So if you can't define what a woman is, you certainly can't define what fraud is. If you can't even define what a woman is, you can't define fraud. It had a nickname during the campaign. And what it was, tampons, he put tampons in the men's bathroom. What the heck are you putting tampons in the men's bathroom floor?

You're such a wimp. You just go along what you think is right for your radical base. But you know, you don't always think like why do these radicals and weirdos keep winning a state? And you look down, all of a sudden they discovered this fraud. Millions of thousands of hunt down some alleys are getting paid. Hundreds of thousands of those were doing nothing. Big daycare. But he monopoly, he bought these votes by scamming it because the Minnesota is not that left and not that radical to have a guy like that. Give me a thought to that clip itself. It's over to go. Is it? Oh, it absolutely is. And you mentioned before Gavin Newsom, you know, he and Tim Walls are really kind of two peas in a pod. It was the same type of thing when when Gavin Newsom is confronted in a face to face setting, he will try to say whatever he needs to say to seem like he is your friend, seem like he's moderate and to get you to think you could vote for him in that situation. So when he hosted Charlie Kirk about a year ago on his own podcast,

Charlie Kirk, very courageously pushed him and grilled him and said, well, surely you can't believe that it is fair or appropriate or males, boys to go and compete against girls in their own sports and to use their own locker rooms. And Gavin Newsom to his credit at the time said, well, you know, yeah, I agree that's unfair. In fact, he said it's deeply unfair to use his words. But the problem is, like you just said, it's the same thing that we see with Tim Walls. It's the same thing we see with Gavin Newsom. It's the same thing we see tragically with Democrats and even some of these Supreme Court justices, they are so beholden to the radical left ideology of transgenderism and LGBTQ plus IA, et cetera. They cannot even think they can step out of line for a moment. They are willing to completely shipwreck their credibility. They're willing to shipwreck their common sense. They're willing to honestly look like fools just because they're afraid they might lose some of the most extreme fringes of their leftist progressive base.

I feel like we lost the normal in our society. It's what everybody would agree upon because we like whether you were Democrat or Republican, and we ended a day to get together, the values are pretty much the same. Now these radicals are insane with these people think through. And you know, and that people on the stage like this is actually ridiculous. Tell us what's next, what are the fights you have happening? Jonathan, tell us, you know, coming up that very important for folks to look out for. Anything else? Cases coming up in front of the courts. We need to keep our eyes out or we need to support your group it. Yeah, absolutely. I would say if you want to go to our website californiafamily.org, we're part of a network, a national network of over 40 state-based family policy groups like this. And I will tell you the the left never sleeps so we cannot either. I know that we're all excited that President Trump is in office. He's doing great things for our country on so many levels. But I can tell you the people in Sacramento are not taking it lying down.

They are doing everything they can every day to find the most radical ways to undermine what's happening in Washington DC, to undermine family values, to undermine people of faith. And we really do need to take action and fight back. So I'd encourage you go to our website californiafamily.org. We can connect you both with our groups in California. And we can connect you if you're in one of the other 39 states where we have allied organizations. I hope that you will realize we have to be the vanguard of liberty. We cannot wait until the next election cycle even in November. We need to start taking action today to protect faith family and freedom. Jonathan, Jonathan, thanks for joining us. I appreciate it and good luck. And thanks for all you do. I'll see you soon. Thank you so much. But last we're going to talk about the White House correspondent dinner. It is the nerve prom. Everybody gets together. Guess who's coming this time? That and more coming up on media exposed.

Welcome back to media exposed after years of. I don't know if it's correctly or not correctly. Call on the White House correspondent dinner of fake news. Love fest and boycottting it. Trump has now accepted it. 2026 except the invitation. Which is I think it's April 24th. I believe it's the date of maybe 25th. And the left we meet at spent but spent a decade or let more than a decade. And the setting rolling around the red carpet this year. Maybe they feel like the White House apparatus and the press corps and the White House. Communications department and press secretary have opened up to too many figures. So they want to show, look, we are the real White House correspondent. It's custody. We're not going to be invited. Arca, you know, Rav's not going to be invited. The other stations lend LTV and. A podcast is not going to be invited to this big love fest. It's like the problem. It's like the nerve problem. They get together. I've been there a dozen times. The nice event right to weekend.

But the same corrupt press corps that called an ex existential threat to democracy. Is now celebrating as an honorary. How does that work out? Are they going to treat them with respect? Well, they set is a setup. Make up your mind. Is he hit lower? Is he your dinner guest? Well, wait and see. Trump has characterized his previous boycott. Simply and correctly, the press was extra extraordinarily bad to him. It was true. Why should he go when it was so terrible to him? Sarah Huckabeech went and they treated it terribly. She got the gracious honor of going and she was sitting to the day us. And they badmouthed her. They criticized. They went after her religion. It was awful the way they did it. No, she shouldn't have been treated that way in the first Trump administration. And but he's one decisively. How could they ignore him? It's Trump news 24 or seven. The White House correspondent is going to drop their comedian this year in favor of a mentalist. Apparently, even they realize their own anti Trump rose routine. I become politically toxic and unwatchable.

You know, they picked the comedians from the left. But most of the comedians had become left or left to Santa. And they come so radical. They can't help themselves to make news. So let's ditch the comedian. Yes, it's a funny. It's a funny event anyway to wait to take a little shots. But Trump promised to make it the greatest hottest, most spectacular dinner of any kind ever. Love here. I hate him. The man has conquered every institution that once tried to destroy him, including this one. Think about six years. I mean, six years is the six year into a second term. You guys at once, every president would go every year. And it'd be this little love festival one night. The folks would come and Trump said, you know what? I'm not going. You people treat me terribly. Why should I show up? You hit me on the bat every single day. You call me the worst names in the book. Why should I show up at your house to Denny? You might poison me.

Finally, they've given in. Let's see what happens. But I want to play this cut here. I was here in 2011. When I tried 2011, I was there. That's when Obama was still president. I believe it was bombing. In fact, I don't sound a lot in the next day or that night, no, the night in that year, but it all started here. When the president was a bomb at the time, made tons of jokes against Trump. Who makes this many drugs sitting president almost nobody. Then he was just celebrity in New York, and he was shot after next pod shot. There's unbecoming at a person at that moment. I was there and I said, why is he making so many jokes at one person? But let's go to cut sex and watch how Obama went after Trump all the way back in 2011. No one is happy. No one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald. And that's because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter.

Did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell? And where are Biggie and Tupac? All kidding aside, obviously we all know about your credentials and breadth of experience. For example, seriously just recently in an episode of Celebrity Apprentice, at the steakhouse, the men's cooking team did not impress the judges from Omaha steaks. And there was a lot of blame to go around, but you Mr. Trump recognized that the real problem was a lack of leadership. And so ultimately you didn't blame Lil Jon or Meatloaf.

You fired very music. And these are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night. Well handled, sir. Well handled. Say what you will about Mr. Trump. He certainly would bring some change to the White House and see what we've got up there. There should be a time and a place, but it was that we could take jokes like that. But I thought it was a little too many jokes that Obama threw out Trump. It was just an ordinary citizen. You're the president of the United States. One joke, two jokes, like four, five in a row.

And Trump's not the kind of guy that likes to be made fun of over and over again. He could take a joke, but not so many. And you can kind of see him seething towards the end of it. And I saw it up close and personal. What he was, and almost like the wheels of revenge was starting in his head at that moment in that time. And he didn't run in 2012. But Romney, but Romney was a decent candidate, but wasn't a fighter. You know, he never punched back. I would say, and the media is attacking over over your bundle of folders. And all because you said I have folders of women. And they made that a story that you really met women in a folder. And every little thing they went after about a stall sliding on the car. And never fought back. That's the problem. Trump fought back in the media. Well, we have a president, Trump, one term, three term, a second term. Probably should have a second term. Probably should be a third term. The second term was so much shenanigans. We all know that.

I've heard that story a million times about shenanigans of that term. But, you know, on this weekend, it's a glorious weekend. When all the mainstream media get together, alternative media will get together. Hopefully everybody can get along. There won't be some attack pieces. They can all shed the light together. I want to show you this photo here. This is my tickets to do. Go to photo one. It's my tickets in 2018. For the White House correspondents didn't have any ten times. It's a whole weekend. So you get there on Friday. They have these events, the CAA celebration. Each newspaper will have their own little party. Let's celebrate and invite dignitaries. You'll get the secretaries today. You'll get a deputy. This. People from different cabinets coming. So I think that Trump is coming this time. They'll bring out his cabinet. Which will come. It'll be very prestigious. Probably invites going now to the Lord. Different cabinet members to different seats. There's another photo here.

Oh, this is photo too. It's me and Sergio Gore. Who was the PPO. It was the PPO of that. The PPO is the personnel department. Now, it's the ambassador in India. We were. You know, we're just friendly there. You know, even though it's a nice close-up of us. It's Sergio Gore. That's photo too. Yeah. Let's quote a photo. Oh, that's Anna Cusperian. He's a very prominent media figure on photo number three. Yeah. Let's go to photo three. Anna Cusperian. She's with the young Turks. Very popular media figure. Anna. And with the young Turks. She's still a radical leftist. But she's become moderate. Even she couldn't take it anymore. She wants to. She tells the story how she was going to get mugged. Because they left that homeless and drug addicts. And she was scared to death. And they didn't even care. It just took the sides of the homeless and reckless. And she changed the tune a little bit. And she's now kind of a moderate when she goes on, which is, you know, how could you not be when they have such crazy policies here?

We're going to jump to 2019 here. Show photo number four here. It's a photo for me and Kathy Griffin of all people. Such an anti-Trump. I don't think she'll be allowed in this one with Trump. You might have a nervous breakdown if she was allowed in. Between her and Rosie. There's no more to hate it from Hollywood of Trump and mega. But. Kathy Griffin. She was friendly. Had a bit of a chat here. It's kind of like that's the big ballroom in the back when they do it to Hilton. They call it the nerve prom because they like to call themselves the nerds. They get together. They have a good time and pre-party in the big. Days that they all get on the day us. They make jokes. It'll be really interesting to watch Trump's interaction with the national media. And it'll be funny because they'll take shots at him that night. But if you look at Trump's press conferences now. He could sell on paper for this or entertaining from this first administration. The way you hit the media.

You never cared. Somebody would say something. Contradictory. Somebody says something negative towards him. Negative towards conservatism. You hit right back. And that's what we liked about him. That's what we have a show here. Old media exposed. We help cover the media. We help call out the media. When they're biased. And they're biased in this term. And they didn't fight. And they was helping out. He didn't want to let the media push them out. But they might have pushed out DHS secretary. So our friends at Hôtelplan have a cutting edge platform.

Easy to book. Easy to navigate. It's AI powered. They've been the business for more than 20 years. If you call the reservations, you'll get a real life human. Not just a chatbot. Go to Hôtelplanet.com for all your books. And I want to thank Fran and Aaron in the control room. Doing a great job. I want to thank David Burke. Candidate here. I want to thank you. And thanks. The other ones for joining us as well. And I'll see you next week on Media Exposed. Music This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

More episodes

More from Real America’s Voice

View all episodes →