Mark Levin: Israel's Biggest Liability

0:00Man in the life man is like this man. You're not in butterfly flattening wing. Take down in the force man. It gonna cause a tree fall. Let it five thousand miles away man. You think nobody's seeing nobody. You know, you don't need no man. It's like you're born in the other world. Man in the other life is like that. Man in the dust of the wind man. It's like a day in the kennel man. Man in the dust of the wind man. Alright, gents. We're gonna be careful today. For a couple reasons. One. This is 55 on Labor Day. I've been in a party. Just got back. So let's say my inhibitions are lower than they normally are when I record. And we're also talking about Markle event.

1:00A man who even in a completely sober state of mind tends to bring out a certain reaction in me. A certain prominent mid-century German folk song starts, you know, going through my head, start walking a certain way. The arm comes up to a certain angle and you know, a jing, gents you got. So if you hear a long, unbroken sensor beep, you know what got me. I'm sorry. I would also like to dedicate this episode in particular to Andrew Edwards, who's a deeply selfish human being because he has a bunch of kids. And oh, it's a holiday. And so, yeah, I couldn't record with me today. So blame him in particular for prioritizing his family over appearing on a podcast where he receives no financial benefit whatsoever for appearing on. So really, I think he's the villain of today. Blame him for why I am exposing you to it dozens of minutes of Markle event.

2:02But in an episode not too long ago, of Markle event in Jerusalem, speak it. And I thought, you know what, that was helpful on one level because it gave you Markle event's unbroken thoughts when it's just him. And I think it's really important to speak it for 25 minutes. But I didn't really give you context as to why Markle event is in the position he is. Both why I have such strong and legally in advisable opinions about the man. But also, why he's a figure in the discourse. Because when I was growing up, Markle event was just on the radio. It was a fiscal hawk. He was a constitutional scholar. He wasn't really one of the tea party guys, but he was close. He was in that orbit. And so the fact that he's become such a... Controversial, we use that term.

3:03Figure. Can be somewhat difficult to pin down. You've seen the clips. And believe me, I've selected a whole bunch of them. I didn't even go back that far. All of these clips, and I have dates for them, are within the last six months. Well after the war started. I'm not even going back into the depths of time here on this one. But I thought it would be interesting to compare and contrast. Markle event with, well, Markle event. And I should say before we get into it, all of these come from one of the best sources on the internet. Chris Manahan writes at information liberation.com. But you can find him on social media at info lib news. He's going to be linked in the description as the source. Go follow him. He's got a great resource. And so he did all the clipping for me. And you might say, isn't this kind of a low effort stream? Taking a bunch of clips that someone else found for you. And yeah, fair.

4:03It is because, like I said, it is now 6 p.m. on Labor Day. I've been over served. And Andrew Edwards has a family or whatever. He couldn't talk to me about a movie for an hour and a half. So this is what we've come to. But in all seriousness, Chris Manahan, great source. Both as a writer and for collecting sort of the worst excesses of the Neocons and the Israel lobby. You should give him a follow. Not if you have high blood pressure. I feel like I should say that. But nonetheless. So the way I've organized these are twofold. Some of them are just relatively recent clips from the last month or so. And then others are on specific topics. Oftentimes comparing and contrasting, well, Mark Levin to Mark Levin. So let's start with a clip not too long ago. Exactly a month ago. Plus or minus. The 9th of August, 2026.

5:04Let's see what Mark, one of my favorite political commentators, has to say about the war in Iran. What the hell has happened to our society? Where is our can do it mentality? And want to talk about the greatest. What the hell has happened to our society? Where is our can do it mentality? And want to talk about the greatest generation versus today's young people. Okay. I got the thinking about this over this taco debate on the internet. That's how pathetic things have become. The great. Okay. So for reference, if you don't remember this, what happened is a minor scandal called Berydo Kay. Right. The genesis of this was a post made by a TPUSA leader. He was talking to a young kid, someone at college, about the economy, about the affordability crisis. And this kid's comment, a pretty simple one, was I don't know man, I just feel like a burrito shouldn't cost $20.

6:12Okay. There's not a chart, not a graph attached to that. Just general sentiment, sentiment that something that used to be cheap, you didn't have to think about, has now become a financial decision. I did streams on this, I did many on it, because I am old enough to remember the housey in days of 10 years ago when I was in high school. And I could go out, get a burrito, for not a lot of money. I could go to Taco Bell, which is what Mark Levin is directly referencing. And my order, which was a full meal, was about six bucks, well under an hour of minimum wage work. So yeah, sure, I guess I artistically could have been stuffing that money away in an index fund. But when you're 16, you know, it's something you don't really have to think about. You can swing that. Whereas now, Taco Bell is significantly more expensive, a Chipotle burrito is the price of a sit-down meal not that long ago.

7:17So regardless of exactly why, and there are a number of reasons we can get into, we have got into. That seems like a significant change. I don't know, it seems like a concern at the very least. But I'll have you know, your actual relevant lived concerns, the things that affect you day to day, let's nothing compared to World War Two. Why are you even complaining? And you may say, well, yeah, obviously, that kid wasn't saying this is literally worse than World War Two, he was just saying it's a problem. But once you've opened yourself up that line of reasoning, of course, well then it's like, well, I don't know. Why are you complaining about October 7th? That's nothing compared to the Black Death. That's nothing compared to the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs. Why are you complaining? Yeah, of course, there's always something worse. Like if you came down with, I don't know, Crohn's disease.

8:18That would probably affect the quality of your life. And if you were telling me hypothetically, you're sitting down for a beer and you're like, ah, you know, I got Crohn's disease, that sure sucks. And I was like, wow, at least you don't have a turbo cancer and AIDS. At least you have all your limbs. Yeah, dude, sure. I don't know. It doesn't seem like a super helpful comparison. And, you know, at least you're not Job from the Bible. I mean, that's true. It would be worse. Things can be worse. But that really has nothing to do with the direct situation we're in, especially when, and we'll get into this. This affordability crisis is largely caused directly by things that Mark Levin has been advocating for. I realize we're now eight minutes in and we've covered 18 seconds of Mark Levin audio, but I'll let it roll. The greatest generation endured the severe economic scarcity of the Great Depression during their youth,

9:21followed by massive global combat and homefront mobilization during World War II. Over 16 million Americans served in the military facing intense physical danger, hundreds of thousands of casualties, strict civilian rationing of food, gas, and clothing. We sit here with a war in Iran against an enemy that has killed thousands of Americans, many thousands of Americans. I remember at time when America would say, let's go. Let's destroy that country, destroy that government. You don't get to kill thousands of our fellow citizens, military or civilians. You don't get to try to assassinate our president. To threaten us with potential nuclear weapons either. So a couple things. One, keep that nuke's comment in your mind. We'll get back to that. Believe me. We've got, according to my rough math, roughly eight whole minutes later in the stream of Mark Levin talking about that. But a couple things.

10:21One, Mark. You didn't fight in World War II. You're not the person to make this comparison. You're a boomer. And I've actually not done this. But let me look up Mark Levin. Let me see when he was born. All right. So Mark Levin was born in, he's born in 57. Okay. So he graduated high school in 74. Let's just control F for Vietnam. See if this guy, oh no results. Okay. So you didn't even, you weren't drafted. So you weren't eligible. You largely got the benefit of the greatest economy ever growing up in it. And then writing the ballooning value of assets. So maybe shut up. You can't make this claim. You were trading on the alleged sacrifices of someone else who isn't you.

11:24You didn't do this. You're comparing a group of people. You cannot relate to you. You did not have the same experience to another group. And look, obviously you can make comparisons outside of your direct lived experience. But hey, man, don't go trading on the reputation of the greatest generation. Because it isn't yours. You didn't do any of those things. You were the beneficiary of those men. And what did you offer? In turn, when it was your chance to pass something on. The same thing that you were offered? Oh no, nothing. Literally nothing. That's what you did when you had a chance. So understand why people aren't necessarily super inclined to, I don't know, take your side on this issue. Again, also, the comparison here isn't great. Because one, let's just assume. The Iranians have killed and maimed thousands of Americans.

12:25There's a debate to be had there. But also, did the Nazis maim and kill thousands of Americans before the war started? I'm not a World War II historian, but if we're comparing apples to apples, that surely should be relevant. If that is the criteria for just great, awesome more that creates this greatest generation. I don't know, that seems relevant. And also, well, surely if we have this sort of awesome, can-do attitude, well, what's happened? What are the consequences of that? Because despite your complaint, Mark, that we just aren't committed enough to this war, but we did a lot. We sent a lot of stuff there. We blew up a lot of stuff. Or do you want more? We'll get into exactly what he wants. Don't worry. But what possibly could have been a more committed response?

13:26Troops? Nooks? I don't know. Let's keep going. See there! Now it's a debate. Should we take him out, shouldn't we? Are you a Neocon or a Warmonger? Is this a war of choice? We don't even have a draft. A couple things. I feel like asking, why did we do this? Because we did choose. Like, yeah. Iran didn't hit us out of nowhere. It's actually relevant question, because if you chose to do it, then the next question is, well, okay, then why? Is it because it was good for us? Or because it was good for someone else? It seems entirely reasonable. Look, hypothetically, of course, if Iran were attacking us out of nowhere, yeah, sure, you have to hit back, even if it was causing problems. You got to repassette, so to speak.

14:27So I think in that hypothetical situation, a lot less people would be complaining. But that's exactly not what happened. It is the converse. We started this out of nowhere, and are now facing the consequences. And so when people say, well, why did we do that? Was it for our benefit? And if the whole point was to make the situation better for Americans, it's not doing that. Well, maybe we should, I don't know, stop doing it. Or the converse, the opposite, which is, well, if we're not doing it for our benefit, who does benefit are we doing this for? Which is a very uncomfortable question. And look, this isn't a radical political process. This is basic problem solving. Like, if you take the war out of it, imagine the same situation at your company where you work. If a change was made to benefit the company, and it hurt the company, you would expect the shareholders to turn and say, you know what? I don't think that was in our best interest, that hurt share value. We should stop doing that.

15:28And if they keep doing it, the question is, well, is this company being run for the sake of the shareholders? And if it is hurting those shareholders, the conclusion is obviously, no, it is not. But it draft even work with young people today, I wonder. Could we even fight World War II today? We're whining about a dollar, a gasoline. Couple things. One mark, you weren't drafted, so shut up. And two, well, yeah, a dollar gasoline matters when it's for a stupid reason. Like if hypothetically aliens descended on America, this battlefield lost angiolus and gas was a dollar more expensive, you'd be like, okay, well, yeah, fair. You know, I get why. It's not a pleasant situation, but you could at least understand. If you were getting rationed food or beef was exploding, and there were aliens on the west coast,

16:28and with their flying saucers, you could kind of wrap your head around it. But when it was a direct choice, when we said, no, we are going to start this war against the wishes of the American people, against the express wishes of the millions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump, we'll get back to that, I promise. Well, I mean, you can understand why people are a little bit peaked. When they pulled the lever for no more awards, got a war, oh, and then in addition, got gas at $5 gallon. Like, that seems to be a legitimate concern. Well, the 1-060 sets. What are we going to do? Mildred, what are we going to do? I don't know, Frank, I want to put that, I don't know. Affordability. Over 16 million citizens served through both the draft and voluntary enlistment, leaving their homes, jobs, families for years at a time, one how-whole they went into after another, including members of my family. I'm going to leave that there.

17:30Troops face brutal conditions across global fronts, resulting in more than 670,000 American casualties and hundreds of thousands of deaths. F- And does this country seem like a country that won a war? Does England seem like a country that won? Yeah sure, they won the immediate conflict, but at what cost? Does that culture get to continue propagating itself into the future? That is also, again, conflating the war in Iran with World War II. Look, even if we take the court history perspective on World War II, just us in Japan, there's a world of difference between Pearl Harbor and the Strait of Hormuz. And look, I'm aware of everything you're typing in the comments about, you know, Roosevelt potentially being aware of the strikes on Pearl Harbor and also sort of instigating it,

18:32I'm 100% aware of that. We're in the frame of court history. Even if you take the Wikipedia summary of what happened, there's a world of difference between Japan showing up, blowing up a US military base, and us deciding basically out of nowhere to go pick a fight with Iran. Those are different things, dramatically different things. I'm sorry, this is not a comparison that can be made, especially by Mark Levin, a man who, let's be honest, you didn't get drafted blood. You didn't? So let's spare the moral high-handedness. Families live with constant anxiety receiving telegrams reporting wounded, missing, or killed loved ones. The vast majority of us are utterly unaffected, personally, our families by what's going on in Iran. Yes, we are, we are completely unaffected by what happens in Iran. It doesn't matter. I've met like four Persians in my entire life, and they were all lovely.

19:35But one, why are they here? And two, why are we going to war? It doesn't matter. It literally doesn't matter. It doesn't affect me, doesn't affect America, but it does affect Israel. It does affect Mark Levin's concerns. And that's why we're there. Again, that is why we're there. We are there at the best of Mark Levin and go. That's why the whole thing happened. It's not like Iran decided to declare war on us. It's not like there's an Iranian PT boat in the Chesapeake Bay, shelling Norfolk. We picked this war at the behest of you, and you're right. It doesn't affect us. There's no real benefit for us in starting this war. It was your idea. You're the ones who got the ear of power. You're the ones who pulled for this.

20:35And now we are the ones bearing the cost. If we did nothing in Iran, sure we would be facing other problems. The cost of living crisis has been going on for a long time. You print that much money during COVID, it's going to happen. I'm not going to deny that. But who says that it wasn't made worse by the deliberate active choice to pick a fight with Iran? No, it's not true. It's going on way too long. That was an accident accidentally hit the keyboard. I got so fired up. But you know what I'm keeping it in? Because it was funny. It was a little bit of low production value flair. It's how you know another producer. This is just me that slightly tuned up and ready to go on Labor Day. It's just kidding. Absolutely. Getting triggered by Mark Levin. It's completely and totally disingenuous argument. I'll let him keep going. Way too long. You know, the price of gasoline and the price of a taco now, it's just crazy. You know, this has gone on long enough.

21:37Are we going to the movies tonight? I don't know. Should we see a play? I don't know. Is football on TV yet? I don't know. This has gone on way too long. You understand. So again, this completely total individual. Sorry. I have to check myself here because this will go up on YouTube. So dishonest. Is if we're just so entitled, we're too stupid to realize this is a civilizational crisis. This is existential. Iran is three weeks away from a nuke. Watch my episode with Ron Dodson, the one before the Star Wars episode where we talk about the Iranian nuclear program. My entire life. My parents' entire lives. I have been assured. They have been short. The Iran is three weeks away from a nuke. Seems like it's been a little longer than three weeks since my parents were born. I've been alive for slightly longer, plus or minus than three weeks. And the world still exists.

22:37You can probably tell from my slightly less than professional podcast lighting that the sun's still shining. We haven't entered a nuclear winter. Has it happened yet? I don't know. It seems like this isn't that big of a threat. And here's the other thing. But why are you so entitled? Why do you feel like you were promised no new wars? Who gave you that idea? You just made it up. Here's August 18th, Mark Lovett. But I'm talking about these individuals, these Woke-Rish, isolationists and neo-fascists. Everyone? Say hi to Mark. Call me out there. They keep saying the President ran on no wars. The President ran on no wars. No, he didn't. Play me the audio. Well, let's do that. Let's examine that. Let's play the audio. And sorry if that came out a little bit garbled.

23:37The Riverside media player is a little bit funky. But let's do that. So I think this is from PBS. Here's a super cut. And Trump promising exactly that over his campaign. Now look, I don't like PBS. I don't necessarily think they have the best take on politics period. But, you know, nonetheless, this seems relevant. And I'm proud to be the first President in decades who started no new wars. That's very good. No new wars. Instead, I brought our troops back home. No new wars. Donald Trump campaigned for his second term. A promise. No new one. They said his personality. Now, look, there's some editorial to this. You know the line they're trying to sell you. You know what alternative they're offering to you. But I mean, you know, nonetheless, the guy made a promise.

24:38No new wars. And well, we ended up in a war. A new one. Not to be a pet into power. And then, well, what was the consequence of that new war? Oh yeah, things got more expensive. That seems relevant. And I don't feel like I'm some lunatic for pointing that out. I don't feel like I'm some sort of unreasonable political actor for saying, well, I exchanged my vote for this promise. And then that promise was not only discarded in the sense that, well, you never got around to it, like, abolishing income tax. But you did the exact opposite. I don't feel like that doesn't make me necessarily a fascist. Now, well, debate my fascism at another time. But those are unrelated claims fundamentally. This isn't even really me, you know, making an affirmative political case. But that objection to saying, hey, didn't you literally campaign for votes on the premise that you, well, wouldn't do the thing that you did? And in doing so, also, in peril, your other promises to, you know,

25:39usher us into a golden age. I don't know. I feel like that's a reasonable objection. I feel like, you know, if you've noticed that, isn't anything wrong with you, per se. But, you know, I guess I'm just woke right. Here's another Mark Lavin clip from the 12th of August. We'll let it play. One other thing, it's mostly footnote. I've said since the beginning of this war with Iran, that I don't believe we need ground troops. And I don't believe the American people would support it, neither party supports it. I mean, we just don't have the argument for it or the support for it. So keep that pinned. Remember that. This actually came up in the last episode. I did a Mark Lavin. Speaking in the Waldoff Hotel in Jerusalem, where he attacked his critics directly. He said, why are you amplifying this claim?

26:40That I've ever advocated for ground troops in Iran. You're libeling me. You're slandering me. Why are you making this up? Well, let's give him a few more seconds to explain himself. And then I'll offer you exactly the receipts you're looking for. I said in March, when we were at the time, when we were discussing the issue of uranium, President calls it nuclear dust, but uranium, how do we get it? How do we get that uranium? Well, if you're going to get the uranium, you need to use either special forces, or the 82nd airborne, and people who are skilled at this sort of thing, and trained at this sort of thing, and we do have people who are. So, unless you're getting confused, you're not advocating for troops. You know, human beings on the ground, you're stepping foot, so to speak. In Iran, he's just advocating for special forces.

27:40And the 82nd airborne, which I realize, you know, I'm not looking to make anyone mad as a conventional unit, troops. One might even say, I mean, you need to make the grand argument that boots on the ground for first two, I don't know, boots on the ground, which would include special forces, you know, guides who wear boots and put them on the ground, but I guess I don't understand. I guess I don't even, I just don't get it. Anyway, Mark. So you'd need to send them in to get it. There's really no other way. But of course, we're not talking about boots on the ground. We do have people who are. So you'd need to send them in to get it. There's really no other way. And so what's happening now is we have people who say the Neocons want to send in ground forces. I said, what Neocons want to send in ground forces? Why don't you give us a long list and name them all?

28:41Because I see no... Mark, it's you. Like, I don't know, like, I don't know, hey, six, seven seconds ago. You are the Neocons. You are advocating for exactly that. You just did it. In this clip, don't worry, I'll show you. An earlier clip, when he was on Fox News, where you can hear his original claim back from Mark, where he says exactly that. But, you know what? But maybe he digs himself out of this hole. No movement for ground forces. Do you, Rick? I've never seen any movement for ground forces. I've never seen any block of individuals. Neocons are not Neocons, calling for ground troops. 150,000 ground troops or 100,000 or 50,000. Certainly not here.

29:41Well, I guess that makes sense. Boots on the ground only count as boots on the ground when it's over 50,000 people. He's not advocating, of course, for boots on the ground. He's only advocating for 49,999, which is, you know, of course, not. They could be considered invasion. That isn't actually, you know, troops, of course. That's something different. But I don't know who they are. Now, maybe it's some third rate somebody or other, but I don't know who they are. Nobody prominent. I don't even know if anybody public. So what happened? You remember Mac Gates? Remember he had a resign from Congress? Remember he tried to cover up an ethics report? He did everything he could to prevent it from coming out. Remember all that? How he deceived his constituents? How he was spinning and lying about his conduct? The drug use, the underage girl?

30:41Did he took on some trips, apparently? I just want you to know it's very, very important we don't lie. Paying for sex? Just the real sleazeball. Real sleazeball. Somehow he has a TV show on some backwards network. Yeah, imagine some dude who lies on TV. As a journalist, man. So he jumps in because I never liked him. I thought that reports should be made public. I opposed him for attorney general. I thought that was ridiculous. Of course he... Yeah, what did I want to write? Of course he had a withdrawal because after 48 hours everyone realized it was ridiculous. We would never get confirmed and he shouldn't be confirmed. He is no character, no morality, and what he did was not something conservative. Or a constitutionalist or Republican should support. Sometimes we have sleazeballs among us.

31:42Just remember that. If you're a constitutionalist or a conservative or a Republican, you definitely wouldn't want a sleazeball. Who wouldn't want someone who lies, someone who's dishonest? I even say this as a defender of Matt Gaetz. I actually don't know very much about him. I just do think it is relevant. If you have opinions on Matt Gaetz to look at who really hates him. For instance, Mark Levin. He's one of them. Well, he's very angry about that still. He can't get over it. It's a psychological mental thing. Yeah, just remember anyone who opposed Mark Levin, they're mentally unwell. They're in hinge that got something kind of stuck in their crawly. They can't get over. That's the only reason they could end any way they're opposing. That sterling reputation. Starclogic. The perfect, the ecelogistic excellence of one Mark Levin. Is because there's something wrong with you. You have a phobia. You have some sort of mental disease. Some sort of psychological issue with you.

32:43If you were normal, if you were well-adjusted, if you would have been in therapy, of course, you'd get this. This would be exactly what you would say. That's the only reason. You can't actually disagree. You can't say, hey, isn't it kind of weird that you promised something and then gave us the opposite? No, no, no. What's wrong with you? Wait, why are you taking your meds? Why aren't you being in therapy? I'm a central Allen, are I? You know what I mean? You know what I mean? So he's been all over the Union in it. Morning, noon and night. It's throwing up there that I... Oh, if you're wondering, by the way, this issue where it goes super low for a little bit, I can't fix it. I've got nothing. It just does that. That's not me editing his voice. I'm just going to get my discount cut rate software. So if you're thinking, hey, I like Jay Bird and I just wish his production value wasn't such a bismuth dog shit. I don't know, maybe give me some money.

33:43It's like six bucks a month on Patreon, Substacker, Gumroad. You can give me money and maybe if I get enough money, this won't sound like something that a complete amateur did in their spare bedroom. I don't know. How's that for Schillin? That I have supported ground forces in Iran. It goes on. Yeah, why would he say that? That you've supported ground forces in Iran? I'm sorry, I'm going to have to keep letting this play, this is going to be a four hour long episode. Sorry, you know what? Fine, Mark. I'll let you finish. It goes on and on and on and on. Cherry picks this article or that article based on that one occasion on Fox. When I encouraged the potential use of special forces of the 80th second airborne, if it was our goal to remove this. Uranium, because there's another way to do it. And I figured that out. If the research in the subject and seeing how we've used special forces in the past to do exactly that sort of thing, even when we've had accidents and so forth.

34:47Okay, I know I said I was going to let him finish, but I can't. I know there's some guys who did some stuff in the J. Bird show audience. And so if you have a background, if you were in special forces, if you were in the 82nd airborne, would you consider yourself to be troops? Would you consider yourself to be included in the phrase boots on the ground? Did you have boots and did you wear them when you walked on the ground? I don't know. I'm going to try to be a peasant about this. I'm not trying to be overly simplistic, but you know. I'm curious to get your thoughts, audience. So, so let's hear the man original. Right? Here's what he actually said. Let me pull this up. Troops on the ground. He said no troops on the ground. I don't remember that in any campaign speech either. Oh, hey, you don't remember, you don't remember no new wars? No troops on the ground?

35:51I mean, that clip I showed you, Trump. I think I showed you 28 seconds of it. There's a whole mother minute. I'm not going to play it. You kind of got the idea. But if you look that phrase up, Trump no boots on the ground, no new wars. You'll find dozens of examples. I'm not cherry picking. I'm not making this up. There are dozens of instances here. But why would we need troops on the ground? Well, there's a lot of reasons. And we wouldn't need 300,000 of them. Okay, so now the number of numbers have moved originally. He was like, oh, well, troops only count his troops. There's more than 300,000 of them. So he did walk it back. He said, well, well, troops only means 50,000. You know, five months later. So, okay, you know, he's improving. He's going the right direction. I don't think he really understands the baseline concept of what troops or boots on the ground mean. You know, I will grant him that 300,000 is bigger than 50,000. Directionally, at least, that's an improvement. It's this uranium, too.

36:53We've got to get the uranium. If it cannot be destroyed, if it cannot be altered, we've got to get it. For the reason I just said, you could make dirty bombs. You know, where time you can still make sophisticated missiles. So you need to get to the uranium. That's why I'm reading in the paper. We're talking about the 82nd Airborne. We're talking about these very special forces and the various military services and so forth. He's not talking about sending regular army and infantry in by the hundreds of thousands. Okay, again, I've never been in the military. I don't claim to be. You realize the 82nd Airborne is part of the army. Like they're an elite unit, but they are conventional. They're airborne, right? Like they're not special forces. They're cool guys that could probably all beat me up. Like that's not the claim I'm making that I'm cooler better than them.

37:56But like, it's setting aside if special forces count as troops or boots on the ground. The 82nd Airborne is just part of the army. Like they are infantry. Yeah, they do cool stuff. I'm not denying that. But the idea you've done research on this past, I don't know, the Wikipedia page. You know, it's absurd. This isn't a real argument, of course. I know what's happening here. I know why he's there. But I just think it's worth saying that Marklevin's greatest enemy is Marklevin. The men he's talking about, the units he's talking about, they are specialized. And you know what else? I remember from my days in the Reagan administration. Many of them are trained for a moment like this. To try and secure enriched uranium. Many had been trained for moments like this. Well, that's good. I mean, look, if you were trained for it, I guess it doesn't count as you being a troop.

38:58You're so trained that your boots don't touch the ground. It's sort of a magical being. Which is, you know, cool. I guess I didn't know the military could do that. But let's keep going. So obviously, you know, Marklevin never advocated for actual human beings, Americans, to go into Iran. But what is something else he hasn't advocated for? Something would be completely insane. No one is actually advocating for, oh yeah, that's using nuclear bombs. And I will say there's a couple clips of Israeli TV, which you can find on the same source page. That's Chris Menahan or at info lib news. You can find Israeli television hosts saying I like shockingly similar things to Marklevin. Why that would be the case. You can speculate. But if you, I didn't want to play that because it's Hebrew audio with subtitles, which of course I can read. But you know, you can do that on your own. I don't know why Marklevin is echoing their points, but he's definitely, definitely not talking about Nuke I ran.

40:05Because that would be insane. That would be retarded. Why would we nuke a country over something that, as you said earlier, doesn't affect us. Let's hear Marklevin from March or April. Excuse me, I want to get my receipts right April 5th of this year. And the casualty numbers as horrible as any casualty is, need some context. Let's look a... Yeah, you need some context. So, you know those guys and men and women who died again, because we chose to start a war for no reason at the best of Israel. Yeah, we were put in context. Okay, comparing to World War II. Compare to the Black Death. Compare them to things that are... Well, incomparable because they were active choices. It's not like Europe sat down and said, hey, let's give ourselves all the Black Death for no reason. Yeah, it happened. It was a disaster. Anyway, sorry. I mean, I keep interrupting him seven seconds in, but genuinely this man...

41:06He...irritates me. Look at World War II. The Battle of the Bulge. 80,000 to 90,000 plus casualties, deaths and injuries and so forth. Nearly 10% of all the casualties in World War II happened to the Battle of the Bulge near the end of the war. Okay, also the fact that these guys, whether it's Rod Dreyer, whether it's Jeremy Borg, whether it's Marklevin, literally compare everything to World War II. Is a sign of that is pure post-war consensus, pure boomer derhagement. Yeah, World War II is incredibly significant to put him out. It shaped the world we are currently at. But dude, you can compare anything to World War II and because of the scale, it doesn't seem that significant. So go. Thermomboly, the Peloponnesian War. I could compare World War II. It's nothing. Yeah, of course you can do that.

42:07But one, World War II is not the touchstone which defined all human history afterwards. It's surely a significant event, no one's denying that. But also, I don't know. Do we apply the same standard to anything else? Or is it just a significant cudule? Is it a way to say? You need to go along with this thing that is manifestly against your best interest. Oh yeah, that's why it's done. Because World War II is a sacred event. It is a religious event. It's not real history in the same way that Thermomboly, the English Civil War, or the 30 years' warrants, where you could talk about it and discuss it in, well, morally neutral tones. Can you imagine someone getting fired from their job? Losing associations, becoming the social pariah. Because of their opinion on Gangescon. Because of their opinion on Cromwell. No, because that's history. And at least for people of Miracle of Ends generation World War II isn't history. It's sacred. It's like what I would do comparing something to the incarnation, or my actual religion, the thing that I believe.

43:18Or is his religion fundamentally is World War II and a certain product of that. The Battle of Okinawa, 50,000 plus casualties, over 12,000 nearly 13,000 killed on that island, which is what convinced Truman that we would lose a million men if we didn't drop the atomic bombs that we did. The Battle of Okinawa, so we're not advocating for dukes, of course. But we are at least comparing this war to situations in which casualties, according to Mark Levin, did justify dropping the bomb. So, no, I'm not saying, but I'm saying, you know, other people in the same situation, besides dropping the bomb. The Battle of Normandy, that you're familiar with, 120,000 plus total casualties, almost 21,000 killed. The Battle of Y- And for what? The Y- We're Jima, where my grandfather fought. You had 28,000 casualties on almost 7,000 killed on this island, that wasn't even really an island.

44:22The Battle of Guadalcanal, where my great uncle fought. You had over 15,000 casualties and so forth. Now, you might say, well, that's World War II, this is a war, a peace mission to stop nuclear weapons that can blow away. Millions of Americans. So, let's talk about that. Right? I just recently informed by, I don't know, Mark Levin. You remember the last episode I did? The real threat was if we gave the Iranians a little more time, their missiles could reach Europe. Now, I like Europe. I like Europe a lot more than, I don't know, other relevant countries, shall we say. But if you're a student of geography, if you've looked at a map, if you, I don't know, have ever used a globe before, we'll be aware of the fact that America is pretty far away from Europe. Generally speaking, of course. And, well, if they don't have the capacity to reach Europe with conventional missiles,

45:28well, how are they going to get nukes to America? Because here's the thing, I did a whole episode with Ron Dodson on it. It's a good episode, talking about missile technology. And I'm continually aggravating artists by not understanding missile technology, not understanding the difference between cruise missile and ballistic missile. I own that. I don't know anything about missiles. Be the first one to say that. But I have been reliably informed by experts, both Ron Dodson and others, that missiles are pretty difficult. And the difference between a conventional short-range missile, something that can go from, I don't know, a Rand to Israel, and a nuclear missile, can I say the right, is it nuclear or nuclear? Adam Bombs, that can go from a Rand to America. We're talking about the difference between like a chariot and a car, like the one in your driveway. This is really complicated. And also, if we aren't at war with a Rand, why would they bother?

46:34They've got bigger problems than Nuking, Arlington. And let's be honest. I, you know what? I realize I'm in the fallout zone. But they might be doing us a favor in there. Again, this is absurd. Trying to turn this into a moral crusade, trying to turn this into a religious war to justify the use of nuclear weapons. For who? Because it's really an existential threat to America? Or is it an inconvenience for someone else? For another group that is not American. I'll leave you to make your own conclusions on that. Every bit as important as a World War II, the Battle of Gettysburg, the Civil War, over 51,000 casualties in that one battle, around three, three and a half days, the Battle of Chudamanga, almost 35,000 casualties. Spots... By the way, the fact this guy even pronounced the name of Civil War battlefields right,

47:34is just an indication that he's got to go back. Okay. The tide...dying everything the World War II, as an attempt to diffuse your natural objection to saying, Hey, why are guys from my country dying in this war? What do we serve to gain? And the last clip, actually, Mark Levin, will go after exactly this. We'll go after the idea that Americans shouldn't be dying in the Middle East. So if you're curious to hear his iron-clad defense, exactly why he thinks that is an illegitimate argument. Keep watching. So they're in a courthouse, almost 32,000 casualties, the wilderness. 30... Okay, not to be a pedant, but... 31,086 is not almost 32,000. That rounds down. I'm not a mathematician, but traditionally by the rules that would round to, roughly, 31,090 if we're rounding to tens, if we're rounding to hundreds, it's 31,000, if we're rounding to thousands.

48:41It's...well, 32,000. Sorry. Well, again, I realize this is kind of an illegitimate or an illegitimate. He's stupid, is a better word to say, point to make, but, you know, nonetheless, I thought I should bring him. 30,000 casualties, Chancellor'sville, over almost 30,000 casualties, Shiloh. In that case, actually, Chancellor'sville, he did round up correctly. 29,800 does round up to 30,000. I'll give him that. 24,000. I could go on and on. Herendous casualties. Crucially important, wars. Setting aside my opinions on both worlds were two in the Civil War. That's the difference. Even my court history, those are important wars. One could argue that they are from a certain perspective existential. Is our disagreement with the ran existential? Well, certainly isn't for us.

49:43But no Iranian ever called me an himself. No Iranian ever, while I don't know, tried to keep me from getting a job because of my medical status. No Iranian ever, I don't know, really calls me any problems. And that's not an endorsement of the mullis, that's not an endorsement of the Islamic Republic. I don't really have a lot of positive opinions about the Islamic Republic, but they are not functionally existential for me. They seem to be existential, or at least a significant threat to the nation of Israel, but I don't live there. Those aren't my problems. Those are someone else's problems. So the idea that we are sacrificing people for non-existential threats, not even non-existential threats for threats to someone else, really limited benefit, I don't know much like earlier objections to Mark Levin. They seem pretty reasonable.

50:44You know, they don't seem like the thoughts of a lunatic, thoughts of an insane person. Anyway, let's hear more about what Mark Levin has to say about using nuclear weapons in Iran. I have in front of me, though, you know, the Potsdam Declaration, July 1945. I wasn't even going to mention this, but I have it. And then we have the Instrumentist Surrender by the Japanese September 2, 1945. And in order to implement the Potsdam Declaration and get them to surrender to the terms that the Allies wanted, we dropped to atomic bombs. Now, I'm not encouraging it. I'm asking you about the law. Is that legal today under the law of the war or not? Alright, I don't actually know who that guest is sitting across from him, but this is an interesting comparison. This is about two weeks plus or minus after that last one. It's from April 18th. But you see exactly the construction going on.

51:46Well, I'm not advocating for putting troops on the ground. Oh, wait, I am. Oh, you think putting troops on the ground is a grave risk to their health? We lose a lot of lives. Well, either don't you know history. We've sacrificed way more lives in war, so shut up. Or, oh, you're actually worried about that. You think that we shouldn't sacrifice lives? Well, guess what? If you don't want to do that, your only option is to nuke them. So the decision tree, apparently, for Mr. Levin, is very simple. It is either we don't send troops, which means we send troops. We send troops, or we nuke them. So, you know, those are the three options presented before us at the past of Mark Levin. And why are you complaining about that? Why do you think that sounds unreasonable? Why do you think that sounds like someone arguing, I don't know, out of some kind of vested interest? It's because you're hateful. You're hateful. You're fairly wrong with you, psychologically, of course. That's the only reason. Let's hear more about what Mark Levin has to say about nuclear weapons in Iran.

52:48I strongly disagree with something the president said today. I heard him say one other time too, which is, if we had an attack, Iran, Israel would not exist and would have been destroyed. That's simply not true. Okay, so, well, Israel doesn't actually need us, and also if we don't come to the defense of Israel, there's something incredibly wrong with us, psychologically. There are other clips you can find, of course, of saying that if you don't support Israel, if you don't act on their behalf, your anti-Western, your anti-Christian, but they don't need us. I mean, you have to. You really, really have to. Or else there's something wrong with you. Or else you're not Western, or else you're not Christian. You're going to hell, one might even say, but we don't need you. Totally don't need you. Oh. It's simply not true. For 12 days, Israel fought a year ago against the Iranian regime.

53:49Before we did. Yeah, so let's go back to that. One, what's Israel doing in theater now? And two, I saw the same videos you did where it seemed like Israel was getting hurt. I saw clips, I'm sure you did too, of pretty scary-looking missiles, the type of which I cannot differentiate hitting Tel Aviv, you know, people in shelters, people running for cover, seemed like they were in a bad spot until, oh yeah, no, we helped them out. We said, no, no, no, no, we'll cause enough problems for a man. So they start fighting us instead of you, we will sacrifice our lives instead of your lives for a fight that you picked. But they don't need us. They totally don't need us, guys. Destroyed its ground-to-air missiles. Destroyed its Soviet and slash Russian radar systems.

54:49By the way, just an unhinged aside the fact that he's somehow trying to tie this into the Cold War when, I don't know, you can research Israel's ties to Russia if you want. There's a reason a bunch of their weapons, pre-I know a certain era, look really Soviet. Right, what is the Galeel? I don't know, where they get a bunch of their stuff. I mean, they have, at least had Russian material. Also the idea that, you know, this is just sort of another front in the Ukraine war. Well, I've been reliably assured that that is some sort of conspiracy theory, but you know what, when Mark says it, it's a little different. Destroyed much of its Air Force. Destroyed much of any of its defenses. For 12 days. We went in on the 13th day with our great bombers and those bombs and we hit those nuclear sites.

55:51But Israel has some very, very powerful weapons that it has not used. I don't know this firsthand, just go online and read about it. It's a secret that's not so secretive. And they've had them for decades. Israel will survive. Period. So, of course, you might ask, well, how did they get those super secret weapons? You know, I wasn't a Markleman, do your own research. Where did Israel get their nuclear program from? And maybe, just like the war itself. Maybe we won't even get to make the choice. Maybe Israel launches nukes in Iran. Wouldn't that be great, you know, because they will survive, of course. You know, you could read about the Samson option, you know what, that proposed final solution. Some might say, you could do your own research, come to your own conclusions on that front, but they don't need us.

56:53They totally don't need us. And I don't know why, you know, 80-Semitic conspiracy theorists like Marco Rubio would say that they do, or that they got us into that. But do you know this? So, let's say, that you're one of these anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists, you say, you know, Israel got us into this. They're seemingly threatening to use nukes, necessitating a response from us. And you say, well, how do they do that? What organizations do they use? Oh, APAC, American Israel Political Action Committee, I should be concerned about that. That seems like they are using that political organ, that operation to produce a result that's obviously working. Well, what does Marco then say about APAC? This is from August 25th. And where are the Republicans in Congress, really? All this money pouring into this country by foreign governments? I just wonder how many members of Congress are on the take. I really do.

57:53Mark, I crazy to hear you say that. So do I. I've also thought the same thing. I've wondered how many of these guys are getting bought off. So let's hear. You obviously come to the same question I have. Let's hear your thoughts. I really wonder how many members of Congress are on the take. They're not. Yeah, 100%. Yeah, they're on the take. They're not going to be so crude as the stick dollar bills in their pockets. But these lavish trips they take to Qatar, these lavish. Oh, sorry, I said, how can I forget a guitar? It's guitar. Well, when I think of American public visual taking trips to foreign countries, enjoying lavish entertainment, it's guitar. You may remember the last one of these response videos I did to James Lindsay. He was talking about a trip he took. He was crying.

58:54He was brought to tears by this trip. How beautiful, how amazing it was. And he titled a whole podcast episodes, an American political commentator called Yum Qatar Chai. Talking about how much he loved the nation of Qatar. How he was talking to a Qatarry general and he said breaking down in tears, you can listen to this if you want, just the importance of Qatar. And in fact, I have heard congressmen, people who sit in our government, win queried, America first or Qatar first, say Qatar first. There are members of congress who will show up to their job representing the American people in Qatar military uniforms. I have you also know it is illegal, functionally illegal, for our government to hide intelligence from the nation of Qatar. It's illegal to engage in anti-cateri activity.

59:57It is in fact even illegal for government contractors to say, I won't do business with Qatar. You don't have freedom of association with a foreign nation as long as it's Qatar. There are countries, states rather, Montana. I think which has recently passed a raft of anti-cateri or anti-anticateri legislature in a state with, I think a couple hundred Qataris, of course the whole thing. It's really astounding, the degree to which Qatar affects our politics. It seems like the top line issue for so many politicians. You can't even figure out why they're so concerned with Qatar, except for the fact that they're getting money. It just boggles my mind. These lavish trips all over the world. Maybe we ought to cut that out. They have these intermediary groups like care.

1:00:57You know, they attack APAC. APAC is an American organization with Jews and Christians providing donations that they have to report and that money is used in our political process to promote the American Israeli alliance. That's kind of cool. If you just call it American, it's American. Your Honor, we put American in the name. Clearly it's any interest in America. It's kind of amazing how it works. You just changed the name and the whole purpose of the organization shifts. It was kind of neat. I didn't know that. Care was set up by Hamas. And nobody spends any time talking about them. The Muslim Brotherhood is the mothership of all these terrorist groups. And our government hasn't even listed them as a terrorist organization nationwide.

1:01:58We have individual governors who are doing it. You know, I'm looking at, at least until they pay me money, I'm not saying anything nice about the Muslim Brotherhood. But should I make that joke? Then actually give me a trouble if I say that. Whatever. In a hypothetical situation where they did give me money, I might be motivated to say something nice about them. But since that hasn't happened, I don't care about the Muslim Brotherhood. I don't think they should be here. I don't think there should be Muslims in America. That seems like, you know, pretty, I don't know. It consists an opinion of mine. But, you know, there are a few instances of politicians. You can look at El Han Omar, some guys from Minnesota for some reason, you know, Zohran Mamdani, who, yeah, are a Muslim. And I think that's a problem. I think we should kindly invite them to return from whence they came. But, you know, we're not at war on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.

1:03:02The country didn't go to war. If you can find someone on, I don't know, let's just say a major syndicated talk show or a television network arguing that we should send not troops but less than 300 or 50,000 people to fight on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood or at least indicating we should nuke the enemies of the Muslim Brotherhood. I mean, show me. I think that's a bad idea. We shouldn't do that either. But, you know, seems to be a minority opinion. Seems like there isn't a lot of representation in politics. And I, you know, in the case of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Heci of the Moss, I think there should be no political representation because this is America. But, you know, you can say it's a problem if there's like, let's just say five guys doing it. But, how many guys does they pack half?

1:04:03Is it more than that hypothetical five? I can't prove it. At least off the top of my head right now. But, I'm pretty sure it is. You know, I could think of several figures. You know, who might be on Fox News, who might have a syndicated radio show, who might present themselves as independent American commentators. Well, I don't know. Speaking at a Waldorf Astoria in a foreign nation on behalf of that foreign nation's government, literally introducing the president of a foreign country. Sorry, the prime minister. I think of some guys like that. Mark, one or two, maybe. Why? And Qatar is poured hundreds of billions of dollars into our country, into our economy, into our schools, into our athletics, just everywhere you can imagine. Yeah, man. Everywhere you look, you see a guitar.

1:05:03Once you start noticing, you can't stop. You might be watching a movie. You see the little brackets around the names. Listening to a foundation, when you hear an idea, and you're like, I don't like that idea. I bet I know where that idea came from. Came from a guitar. Just happens. In the new. In the new Medal of Honor museum. Qatar put money. You go to major hospitals. There's Qatar. There's Qatar. Here they're everywhere. They're influenced. They just buy it, buy it, buy it. Yeah, can you believe that? People with some sort of foreign allegiance, just buy stuff. Sports teams, even. They don't add a lot of money to museums. All right, so one last clip. And then we can wrap this up. See, you may have said throughout this, I don't think Americans should die on behalf of a foreign nation.

1:06:06I don't want you to know that's wrong. You think America exists to be a home for Americans? Again, who gave you that idea? So this clip is specifically in response to commentary from Jo Kent. I mean, I don't know. I don't pretend to have any great affection for him. I have friends who know him. They say he's a good guy. But, you know, I don't know the guy from that. And he put out this radical insane idea that Americans shouldn't die on behalf of other nations. So let's see what Mark Levin's cutting in size of commentary on that objection is. When you put that letter out, you knew it would do maximum damage to the president, Dinyar, the timing, for instance. If you were going to resign because you didn't agree with this war, why didn't you resign when the war started? Because I was hoping that we would immediately de-escalate and try and get back to negotiating cable.

1:07:07We would start a war and de-escalate this three days. Yeah, you would do something. Notice it wasn't working. It was causing problems and saying, all right, well, shoot, we got other options. We should pursue those. Yeah, but what lunatech, he's talking, of course, to Jo Kent here. Yeah, yeah, why would you think that you try something and when it doesn't work, try to do something else? What's wrong with you? You never said, you know what? I bet you did that deliberately to sabotage this great idea. In fact, the only reason is going wrong. The only reason this war is going wrong is because of you. If you were like the greatest generation, if you just cared a little more, you just had a little bit more heart. If you were just willing to get drafted, like I didn't get drafted, would it be working? It's all year full. I thought I was hoping that we were working with you after strikes. And then, let me say strikes like we did in midnight hammer and then back off and go back to the negotiating table. Once I realized that that was not going to happen and we were spirally deeper into this and we were starting to lose brave men and women.

1:08:07And yet another Middle Eastern war driven by the Israeli agenda. That's what led me by men. You got a real hate on it. You got a real hate on it. You got a real hate on it. You're full of hate. But why are you so full of hate? Why are you so irrational angry? Why is there something wrong with you? You're just born wrong. You're full of hatred. That's why you might say, hey, I lost my wife in a war at the Bess of the Israel lobby. I don't think anyone else should go have to go through that. I'm going to resign. I'm going to publicly say exactly why I'm going to resign. Why would you do that? Oh, it's because, yeah, it's because of hatred. Not, you know, the fact that you sacrificed an immense amount of your own time. But also, literally, your wife, the mother of your children. Oh, yeah, no, it's just hatred. Those other things are relatively inconsequential. Don't you understand World War II? Think about how much worst World War II was then Joe Kent, himself going to serve and then losing his wife.

1:09:08Yeah, but didn't you know World War II happened? Didn't you know the greatest generation also had bad things happen to them? How could you ever criticize something else as being a bad idea when some other worse idea occurred? You got a real hang on, brother. No, you do. Hold on, hold on, Joe. When I had you on my show, I read your texts. I read them out loud and you've like done a 180. Why is that? Because you had access to intelligence or something. Why have you changed? I have. I have. Why have you? Why have you changed your opinion when the situation changed? Well, why have facts? Why have actual the situation of play resulted in a different strategy? What you're supposed to do is agree with me and keep agreeing with me forever, regardless of what fruit it bears. You're supposed to do what I want, regardless of the consequences for you.

1:10:08That's what you're supposed to do. I'm glad we got to that. I'm glad we got to the conclusion. I'm glad we got to that just sterling piece of logic. Because you might say, well, regardless of if 50,000 or 300,000 people, whether specialists are not counts as troops, that might go badly. That might not be in my bed. I'm not supposed to react to that information. I'm just supposed to keep doing it. I might say, well, maybe nuking Iran would be bad for America. No, no, no, no. That's not the point. That's not the point. The point is to do what Markov間 says, forever, regardless of the consequences. I'm glad we got that clear now. I have not done a 180. I have no problem with us working with Israel. I have a problem with Israel and so I have an awful lot of policy in the Middle East as they have done to get us into the war. Do you have no respect for non-legal Trump's agency? Yeah, yeah, you might notice the thing that happened or the thing that, I don't know, Mark or Rubio and others have said, yeah, that's just because you hate Trump.

1:11:08And again, I've been very critical of Trump. I don't have an irrational hatred for him. I think he has made a series of very bad decisions. But as far as I'm concerned, it's not personal. I don't like punch a Donald Trump pillow. It doesn't keep me up at night. I'm not offended by the man morally. But at a certain point, you got to call a spade a spade. And if someone is making bad decisions, if someone is taking the country in a negative direction, you were an idiot if you can't recognize that. You were a slave. You were on the plantation. You're not an actor anymore. You're just sitting there in clapping. See that he has the capacity to make these decisions himself? Yeah, no one's denying that he ultimately, I don't know, is making the decisions. Actually, now that I say that an argument could be made that he's not. But the question, of course, is who's best? Like, well, why? It's because it's better for us. It doesn't seem to be better for us.

1:12:09But it does seem to be better for someone else who also seems to be super represented in the group of people that I don't know, get to talk to the dude. Get to talk to the president, so to speak. Yeah, it's really astonishing how direct Mark is. It, look, Jinsa, whoever has borrow, you're listening to LaBeeber Langley, just a piece of advice. But do not let Mark live in talk. He's making you guys look horrible. Genuinely, the thesis of all of this is, sit down, shut up and take it. Why are you complaining? Now, look, I never had to give everything up. But you should. You should bear the cost for my four-in-allegances. That is Mark Levin. It's all there is to it. Mobilize troops? Well, that doesn't count as mobilizing troops. Whether it's 50 or 300,000? Yeah, we should do that. It's an existential crisis. They're going to drop nukes over Los Angeles somehow.

1:13:09Or maybe we should just nuke them. You know, maybe we should, maybe we should do that. To protect our way of life. Got a nuke Taran. Oh, you've noticed that there's some sort of influence operation. Well, what about this other one? What about the tar? Well, I do have an influence operation, but it has America in the name. What do you care? Oh, you think America's acting the best of some other nation, maybe through that lobbying organization we mentioned earlier? Why are you so full of hate? Why do you hate the president? Why are you helping the left? Why do you love Muslims so much? It's really incredibly disingenuous. It's all right. We blazed through that. It was pretty fun. Hope you guys enjoyed it. These episodes are hazardous to my health. I'll put it that way. But nonetheless, I hope you guys enjoyed it. Of course, these are sponsored Axios remote fitness and coaching,

1:14:09Fox and Sun's coffee products. I use all the time. You should check them out. JD is a good guy. He really knows what he's talking about. You should give him money. Because it gives me money. But if you wanted to just me money, you know, help me get slightly better production value at the episodes early and add free. You can throw me a few bucks, pay your own, sub stack or gum rod. Remember, why can't last forever? Good night.