Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
societySep 4, 20261:00:40pending

MA v Lindsay Clancy, Part 6

About this episode

THE LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL: CLOSING ARGUMENTS & A JURY DIVIDED

After weeks of testimony, the Lindsay Clancy trial is finally in the hands of the jury.

In this episode, we break down the closing arguments from both sides — the defense’s claim that Lindsay was suffering from postpartum psychosis and the prosecution’s argument that her actions show she knew exactly what she was doing.

We’ll cover the defense’s “three quarters” demonstration, the prosecution’s response, the final battle over Lindsay’s mental state, and the instructions jurors were given to decide criminal responsibility.

Then, we follow the deliberations as the jury struggles to reach a unanimous decision — including multiple notes to the judge and the revelation that one juror may be standing between this case and a verdict.

After everything we’ve heard, can twelve jurors agree on what was happening in Lindsay Clancy’s mind on January 24, 2023?

Get every episode summarized

Each time 13th Juror Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

MA v Lindsay Clancy, Part 6

13th Juror Podcast

0:00
1:00:40

More episodes

More from 13th Juror Podcast

View all episodes →