Just How Bad Were the Oral Arguments Re: Presidential Immunity?
About this episode
Episode 1028
Can a former President of the United States be prosecuted for trying to overturn a democratic election? The Supreme Court just spent two hours and forty minutes (!) hearing a case in which they were supposed to be reviewing this simple question and Donald Trump’s claims of total immunity. We review the last oral argument of this term and try to cut through the bad faith, irrelevance, and misdirection to understand what is actually happening here and where it all might be going.
-
DC Trump indictment (8/1/23)
-
CSPAN’S complete bookmarked SCOTUS oral arguments in Trump v. U.S. (4/25/24)
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!
Get every episode summarized
Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Opening Arguments
Most Lindsay Clancy Coverage Has the Law All Wrong
Opening Arguments
ICE Went Undercover To Expose a Vast Antifa "Conspiracy"
Opening Arguments
Supreme Court Says Why Prevent Trump Violating the Constitution Before It Even H...
Opening Arguments
Meta Must Pay, Bannon's Judge Pushes Back, and a Dolly Parton Shoutout from the...
Opening Arguments