About this episode
Why is objectivity important when it comes to how judges decide cases? Tara A. Smith joins us this week to talk about what people mean when they say “We want judges to be objective and to uphold the law.”
We discuss the what, how, and why of judicial objectivity, first principles, the value of discretion among different government actors in a legal system, and we compare Smith’s theory of judicial review to other, competing theories.
Show Notes and Further Reading
Smith’s book on this subject is Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015).
Trevor recommends the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremberg, directed by Stanley Kramer.
Near the end of the episode, Smith mentions Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman’s Weekly Standard article “The Next Justices.”
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Free Thoughts publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Free Thoughts
Coming Soon: The Liberty Exchange
Free Thoughts
Fighting Government Secrecy (with Patrick Eddington)
Free Thoughts
When Is Democracy Undemocratic? (with Emily B. Finley)
Free Thoughts
Floods, Nuclear Power, and Wages (with Peter Van Doren)
Free Thoughts