Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 14, 20261:09

Judge Cleared of Harassing Barrister on Twitter

About this episode

Portsmouth Judge Cleared of Harassing Womens Rights Barrister on Twitter

A Portsmouth judge, Daniel Sawyer, has been cleared of harassing a prominent womens rights barrister, Dr. Charlotte Proudman, through an anonymous Twitter account. The account, Yet Another Tweeting Barrister, was linked to Sawyer due to his passion for horseback archery. Sawyer admitted running the account but denied any intent to harass. The case raised questions about judges following social media guidelines and sparked debates over judges online activity.

Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.

Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]

This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].

View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/315a90d5002f3962

Get every episode summarized

Each time UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Transcript ready

18 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Judge Cleared of Harassing Barrister on Twitter

UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

0:00
1:09

Full transcript

UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!Judge Cleared of Harassing Barrister on Twitter. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

On March 14th, a Portsmouth judge has been cleared of harassing a prominent women's rights barrister through an anonymous Twitter account. Judge Daniel Sawyer faced claims he targeted Dr. Charlotte Proudman with critical posts that mocked her views on gender violence and rape laws. The post stated back to 2022 when he was a part-time judge. Investigators Link Sawyer to the account called yet another tweeting barrister through his passion for horseback archery. He admitted running it but insisted the comments did not cross into bullying. The case raised questions about judges following social media guidelines. Dr. Proudman, a vocal campaigner, described the online attacks as a public display of misogyny unfit for the bench. She believes it was a deliberate effort to undermine her work. Supporters saw it as part of broader pushback against her advocacy. The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office reviewed a complaint filed in June 2025 and found no intent to harass. They ruled his actions did not merit any discipline despite an early mix-up in their response.

This outcome highlights ongoing debates over judges online activity, even as both sides stand firm in their positions.

More episodes

More from UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

View all episodes →