Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
sportsApr 6, 202649:45

Islanders fire Roy, hire DeBoer in late-season shakeup

About this episode

For the second time in a week there has been a major change behind the bench of an NHL team, this time with the New York Islanders firing head coach Patrick Roy and replacing him with Pete DeBoer with just four games left on the schedule. Today, the guys break down the Isles’ surprising decision, assess John Tortorella’s first week of work with the Vegas Golden Knights, and check in on Macklin Celebrini’s Hart Trophy potential as the young phenom keeps his San Jose Sharks in playoff contention. Plus, the Buffalo Sabres are playoff-bound for the first time in 14 years, ending the league’s longest drought, while the Detroit Red Wings are in danger of extending their nine-year postseason absence after another end-of-season collapse.


Hosts: Max Bultman and Mark Lazerus

With: Jesse Granger

Executive Producer: Chris Flannery

Producer: Chris Flannery


Watch full episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@theathletichockeyshow


Join our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/VTm9VjkF


Subscribe to The Athletic: https://theathletic.com/hockeyshow


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Athletic Hockey Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

1,016 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Islanders fire Roy, hire DeBoer in late-season shakeup

The Athletic Hockey Show

0:00
49:45

Full transcript

The Athletic Hockey ShowIslanders fire Roy, hire DeBoer in late-season shakeup. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

This is the Athletic Hockey Show. Hey everybody, I'm Max Boltman alongside Jesse Granger and Mark Lazarus for another episode of the Athletic Hockey Show and Lazarus, I sure am glad that podcasts hosts have more job security than NHL head coaches because with four games left, just after we had talked about how wild it was, the John Torturella replaced Bruce Cassidy in Vegas with, I believe that was eight games left. The Islanders said, hold my beer and they have fired Patrick while they are replacing him with just four games left in the season with Pete DeBore. If the Vegas one was a surprise, this is a shocker.

I mean, it's sheer desperation, right? You lose a few games in a row. You start falling out of the playoffs and you panic. I don't know what's a bigger panic, we're doing this with four games left in the season or when you see a coach get fired four games into a season, which we've seen many times in the NHL where there's a guy waiting in the wings and the team clearly is looking for an excuse to move a guy out and hire the new guy. That's kind of where this is. It's like the Islanders saw a guy, a, we need help you. We need something to get some life into this team. This is getting bad and we're going to miss the playoffs in the year that we can have it in a wide open east and B, we don't want to get stuck with our, you know, our pants around our ankles. We want to get Pete DeBore now before everyone else has a chance at him. So the Islanders make this desperation move and I can't honestly tell you it's not the right one. I feel like they had to do something. This is drastic, but it feels like it might be the smart thing to do, doesn't it? I view this one very, very different from the Vegas coaching move because I think the second thing you said is what's actually happening here is that Pete DeBore was going to get a job and the Islanders thought Pete DeBore is an upgrade over Patrick Waw.

And you can argue with that. To me, that's pretty clear. I think Patrick Waw is a good coach. I think Pete DeBore is a great hockey coach and all he does is win. They were going to miss out on Pete DeBore unless they did it right now. And now you couldn't fire Waw on a win streak as he's leading you to the playoffs. So what is in a four game losing streak that they fall on, it gives you a reason and I don't see his panic. Whereas the Vegas move, I see as John Torturella is a good coach, Bruce Cassidy is a great hockey coach. I think the Goldenites downgraded at coach in order to try to spark their team for a run this year. It's, to me, the situations are very, very different despite being last minute coaching changes for teams fighting for the playoffs. Well, yeah, you look at it like Pete DeBore has been in the conference final six of the last eight years. I did. This is a guy who's had a job as a head coach in the NHL for 19 consecutive seasons, despite being fired five times. That's how well regarded he is. That's the kind of impact he has. Torturella hasn't done squat since winning the Stanley Cup 22 years ago.

This is the Torturella's last ten season. I was just looking this up before we went on the air. Miss playoff, miss playoff lost around one, lost around one, lost around two, lost around one, miss playoffs, miss playoffs, miss playoffs fired. That is not an upgrade. You're right. Pete DeBore wins. Pete DeBore has not won the Stanley Cup, but he gets teams into the playoffs. He structures them well. He fixes problems and he gets them to make runs. He wins playoff series and that's something the Islanders are looking for right now. Just to kind of flesh out both of your points about jumping the line, right? As of right now, every team in the NHL has a head coach two weeks from today or less than two weeks from today. That will not be the case. There will be openings. Pete DeBore would have his, would presumably be at the very top of the list for a lot of the teams out there. If you are a team that hopes to make the playoffs and hopes to be busy and have a head coach less than two weeks from today, your options basically were risk that he would sign with one of those teams or become the only vacancy in the NHL and be able to offer an immediate playoff race, which is pretty attractive, I feel like, to a head coach.

Maybe give yourself the option at that new coach bump too. I felt like that was part of it for Vegas as we see this. We see it spark when you make a coaching change. I think that's part of the Islanders have slid too. This is, it's not totally different from the arc of Vegas. It's just different in terms of the candidate and they did not give John Torrella a long-term deal, which is, I think, telling. I think you are under underestimating a little bit the urgency of now, like, yes, I do think jumping the line matters, but the Islanders, the way they have played in front of Ilya Sorokin. Look, we've been talking all year about how Ilya Sorokin deserves MVP. He consideration is goal-saved above expected is so high. Well, how do you get a lot of goal-saved above expected? You face a lot of scoring chances. And the Islanders have been doing that all year and especially lately during this kind of nose dive they've been taking, they've been so disorganized defense and they've been terrible. And Sorokin's flailing back there, he's finally coming back to Earth because nobody could stop all these shots. What does Pete the Board do? He structures a defense. He makes you play better systematic hockey. And the Islanders, the timing makes sense. They have like four or five days off here where they can have this little mini training

camp before their last four games of the season, see if they could put something together. It's not like anyone in the East is running away with this other than Pittsburgh right now. All these teams that couldn't lose in March can't win in April. So if they win three out of these last four games, they can still very well make the playoffs. And I think they really believe that De Board is a better chance of doing that than Patrick Watto's. I think De Board will help structure them. He's a shot suppression wizard. Look at every team, Pete the Board's ever coach in his entire career. They never give up any shots. And then the other part of it is, if you look at the Islanders and the core of this team is Matthew Schaefer. And to me, when I think about Pete the Board, that's the number one thing that sticks out to me about his systems and his the way he coaches is he maximizes offensive defenseman. He did it with Brent Burns in San Jose, like that was for years and years and years. And Brent Burns was his best player fueling those teams, the transition on those teams. He came to Vegas, Shea Theodore, I thought the best Shea Theodore's ever looked was under

Pete De Board, letting him be that driver of the offense. He goes to Dallas where he's got high skin in Thomas Harley, kind of emerged under De Board. I think there, I don't know if there's a better coach in the league to get the most out of Matthew Schaefer than Pete De Board. The guy I first thought of was Sorokin because as good as Pete De Board has been for his teams, for his young defenseman, for his offensive defenseman, has not always ended on, and actually has seldom ended on very good terms with his star goalie. And that was the first one. Why what happened with this Chessie? So I, okay, I've spent the first five minutes of this podcast praising Pete De Board, so that setting up so that everyone knows I'm not just a Pete De Board hater. Pete De Board. And like, I don't know how else to put, how more plainly to put this, Pete De Board does not know what he's doing with his goal tenders. He doesn't. And he's been to a million places and he cannot figure it out. He couldn't figure it out in San Jose. He couldn't figure it out in New Jersey before that. He ran Marty Burdour out of town. That's a, that's an exaggeration.

But he was part of it. He goes to San Jose. It didn't work out with the goalies in San Jose. He came to Vegas. It was an absolute disaster. His plan with Robin Leonard versus Mark Andre Flurry. And he goes to Dallas and I said to myself, okay, if there's a situation that Pete De Board can't mess the goalies up, it's one with a star franchise young J. Gotinger and real, and Casey Dismith and as a backup, who is a solid backup, but is no challenge or no, there should not be a consideration to go to him at any point. Well, Pete De Board proved me wrong. He did mess up the goalies there. So while I want to say it's Ilya Soroken, how, like, it doesn't matter who the coach is. Like, you can't mess it up with Ilya Soroken. Pete De Board might find a way. Well, you're not, you're not hiring Pete De Board to be John Cooper or Jared Bender. You are not hiring Pete De Board to be your long term coach. He doesn't last. He's his shelf life is three or four years, kind of like Peter Laviolette, a lot of these guys that kind of like burn bright, but burn out real quick. I think he had five years in San Jose's longest stint.

Uh, yeah, and he usually burned some bridges on the way. I mean, I was in that press conference last year when he basically threw J. Gotinger under the bus and blamed him for the star's loss, which was just one of the most jaw-dropping things I've ever seen at a press conference, just how casually he did it. Like, it didn't even feel calculated. He's like, oh, yeah, yeah, take out and drink this completely. Uh, he's got to make more say as he blew it for us, basically. Uh, this is what he does, but that's the Ilya Soroken thinking about 2032 here. They're thinking about right now, they're thinking about next year, they got this window here. Uh, it's not as important as it used to be, but when you have a star on an entry level contract, you need to maximize that window as much as possible. And they have one of the very best defensemen in the world for $975,000 a year, whatever it is for the next two years, they need to maximize that window. That's the window peaked to boarders here for to win right now for an eye-later scene that didn't think they were going to have this opportunity when the season started. So they got passed in the standings yesterday. They are now on the outside of the bubble looking in, uh, it's still very possible that they get into as a wild card. It's still very possible that they get in as a divisional seat in the metropolitan division.

It's that close in the east. It's especially that close in the metro. What is the ceiling though, Laz of this Islanders team at this point? Because it still feels to me like they're going to be underdogs in any first round series. Well, they were supposed to be retooling, right? Like Matthew Schaefer being as brilliant as he was, really changed the calculus on Long Island. Like this was not a team that was expected to make the playoffs this year, even content for the playoffs, but then something like Matthew Schaefer happens and you feel an urgency that you didn't feel before. I do not think this is going to be a stand that got content or anytime soon. I don't know what they can do this off season. I don't know what Matthew Darsh can really pull out of his hat to greatly improve this team, but you do have Matt Barzel playing at a high level. You have Bo Orvat playing at a high level. You have arguably the best gold tender in the world and you have the most exciting undefensed and elite. You should be able to put together a playoff contending team around that and the Islanders or one of those teams were getting around or two of the playoffs, you know, that's pretty good. That's kind of the goal right now. That gets some, you know, you get some revenue out of that. You get some excitement in your fan base out of that. You sell tickets off of that. Not every team is playing for the Stanley Cup every year and I think the Islanders right

now are in this, all right, we're not as bad as we thought we were going to be. We're not as far off as we thought we were going to be. Let's try to maintain this, build around it and see if we can do what Boston or Pittsburgh is doing and kind of get to the top of the pack without really changing things that much. I think that's where they are and Pete debores the kind of coach that accomplishes that. I think New York's ceiling is very low. I think the deadline was not good for them, Braden Chen, Andre Palotte, they got older and slower. Palotte has done almost nothing since coming in. Chen has been better than that, but still not maybe the impact that they probably initially hoped. I just don't think I agree. This team's an underdog in the first round. I think the Islanders ceiling is how many series can Ilius Arroke and steal them single handedly because they're not better than anyone they're going to play in the playoffs. All right. The question I want to answer before we go to break here and we're going to talk about the comp for this, which is the story that's playing out in your market right now, Jesse in Vegas. But first I want to ask about Patrick Waw, because he's had now two stints as a head coach.

The first in Colorado, I'm pretty willing to write off as a iconic player learning just how hard it is to be a head coach. I felt like is this Islanders tenure was fairly successful, but ultimately the Islanders still felt the need to pull the shoot here. Will we see a third act for Patrick Waw head coach, Jesse? That's a great question. There are probably going to be, I don't know, seven, eight teams needing a head coach. Like we see this every year, maybe maybe a little less than that. I would imagine Patrick Waw is going to be one of the candidates for those jobs. So it wouldn't surprise me at all to see him get to the job. I agree with you. I thought that this stint was good in New York. I think you like you listen to him talk. He's not just a great goalie who named Patrick Waw. I can listen to him talk. He understands coaching. I think he's a good coach. The NHL loves hiring previously fired head coaches instead of giving new, young, assistants jobs. So yes, I'll guess Patrick Waw does get a job in the NHL this next season. And by the way, it's not all just on like the strength of his plan career that he's gotten these. He was a remarkably successful QMJ HL head coach before coming into the Islanders

here. And don't forget, when he came to Colorado the first time, you took a bad team and took them to a division championship very quickly. Like he has succeeded in the NHL. I know we always complain about retreads. I complain about the retreads as much as anybody. But I mean, Paul Maurice has been in the Stanley Cup final the last three seasons. Pete DeBoer has been to all these conference finals. Rick bonus. We were just talking about him a couple of weeks ago as coach of the year, who's more of a retread than Rick bonus. Peter Lava, you let was in the conference final a couple of years ago. There's a reason that these GMs get, you know, they rehire these guys. And yeah, part of it is a lack of imagination, but it is a lot safer to hire a Pete DeBoer or even a John Tordwell. I'm not even not so John Tordwell, but it is it is a lot safer to hire some of these retreads than it is to try to find the next Dan Muse because you might get stuck with the next Jeremy Collatin. There's a lot of guys who flame out real quick when you're trying to be the smartest guy in the room and pick someone new. It's really difficult to do that. We appreciate it when we see it when you see a Dan Muse, you're like, yes, good job. You found the next great coach and look at what a good job he's doing. But it's just a lot safer to hire a guy who has succeeded in multiple places.

And frankly, Patrick Law has. He succeeded for a little bit in Colorado. He's he exceeded expectations on the island. He's going to get another job because this is the NHL. All right, let's say a quick break right there. We'll be right back. We'll talk about Tordorella and Vegas. All right, we are back and we are one week Jesse into the John Tordorella experience in Vegas. So we'll stick with the theme of new coaches hired late in the season trying to work some magic here. I've always kind of imagined when John Tordorella walks into a new coaching situation. The first thing is he does is he walks into locker and flips a table and you go from there. Am I wrong? We're seeing a new page turned, I think, for John Tordorella. It's interesting because this is a coach known for his aggression, I guess, and yelling at the players at times and his emotion. And the players have mentioned the emotion he's shown on the bench already. But he's almost trying to do the opposite here in Vegas where he came in and he said,

the Golden Knights hadn't been scoring many goals. That was the biggest problem for this team when they made the coaching change. And John Tordorella came in and he's like, I just want them to play without thinking. I want to try to relax them. I want to try to make it okay to make mistakes. And I thought the great example and it was kind of a good, like, anecdote for what he's trying to get the players to do after his first game. Tordorella comes into the media room and we're all like, all right, first towards post game. I wonder how this is going to go. And he's just cracking jokes about himself the entire time. He told us that he was calling Nick Dowd, the wrong name for half the game. And he was calling him Wardo. I don't know if that's like Joe Ward is an assistant coach for the Golden Knights. I don't know how he got Wardo for Nick Dowd, but he was calling him Wardo. And the player, he said the players on the bench just let him do it. Like they thought it was hilarious. They were just like, don't tell him that he's calling the wrong name. Just keep letting him call Nick the wrong name the entire time. So he came in and he like, he cracked a joke about that. He cracked a joke about how when the power play ended, he didn't have a line ready to go out. So they're just like scrambling to get three players on the ice.

And then he, and basically he's admitting all these mistakes and he's like, and that's what I want the players to do. Like just if you're going to make a mistake, make it out of aggression. I don't want you to be on your heels worried about mistakes. And I think that maybe that's what they thought was the problem under Bruce Cassidy. Bruce Cassidy is a very exesano's strategic coach. And maybe the thought was the players are afraid to make mistakes under Cassidy because it's such a rigid system and they brought Torturella in. And he basically hasn't changed anything systematically. He's just telling them to play simpler and play more aggressive. And if you're going to make mistakes, do it out of aggression and so far it's worked. It's so strange because it felt like, you know, when the move happened, it was like, all right, you think it's hard to play for Bruce Cassidy? Here comes John Torturella, guys, you better, you better shape up. And then he comes in as this cuddly soft version of John Torturella. And you wonder how long that's going to last, right? Is he coaching just for the rest of this year? Is he going to be back next year? Is he just kind of like, like, play acting here? You mentioned, like, I wanted to ask you, like, if any, because to see what happens in

Long Island, we're like a week in the future here when you look at John Torturella. And we're talking about compete to board, make these structural changes that will save the Islander's defense. You're saying he's not doing that in Vegas. It's just a vibe shift. He came in. I think the first sentence out of his mouth when he was introduced as head coach the morning excite of his first game, he said, I'm not going to make any changes. Everyone just kind of looked around like, wait, wait, what? Like, fired the coach, the Stanley Cup win in coach, or the games left, so that John Torturella can not make any changes. He was kind of like, it's not all exactly black and white that way, but he did say, like, I don't plan on making any major strategic alterations to the way this team is playing. He didn't feel like there's enough time to install a new system and make it effective. It's more a emphasis thing, like he's emphasizing different things on the forecheck. The forecheck itself hasn't changed, but he's just emphasizing different things on it, different things on the breakouts. He keeps saying, play faster.

I'm a little concerned that the Golden Knights weren't playing slow because Bruce Cassidy had them playing slow. I think they're playing slow because they're slow. That isn't going to change under John Torrell. He has, that's probably the word he's used most is play faster, play North. That's, you're going to hear that most coaches talk about that, but that has been his biggest emphasis. I just, they've, they've gotten the bump. They've won three games in a row. Two of them, I barely count because Vancouver, I think, it didn't matter who the coach was. They were going to beat the Vancouver Canucks. Calgary, it was a tough game. They ended up getting the win. The win up in Edmonton was very good. Yes, they were missing dry sidle and hymen, so you could even poke holes in that one. But I thought that was one of the better games the Golden Knights have played in a while, in months. So they are trending better. We haven't seen them play against a really good team yet. And part of me wonders if this, this, this like initial bump that they're getting from Torrella and the excitement of having a new coach that they all seem to really like, will wear off by the time they play against a playoff team, which I've said multiple times on this podcast. This team cannot beat good teams.

They haven't beat them all year. Well, they may not see a, a playoff team, at least one at full strength until the playoffs because they're, they're next five games, they're final five games. Vancouver at Seattle at Colorado, who should have clenched by then, may well be resting guys and then home versus Winnipeg in Seattle. So this may be one big surprise as the post season begins of like, what do the Torrella Golden Knights actually look like in a playoff series, but what you said there, Jesse, I think resonated with me. It was very similar to what I experienced when Todd McClellan came in and Detroit a year ago. And it was the words were like, you know, robotic stiff, like they felt too rigid as well. And McClellan had the, the viral practice quote, you know, play F and hockey, you've done it in your whole lives. And, and that really worked. That resonated with players. He did not change really any systems in season, similar deal. You don't have a training camp to do a full install. You just kind of have to inject some spirit into the group. And I was struck by how powerful that was, but it definitely has a shelf life because coaches, they're, they're wired to, to ultimately come down hard on you too.

Like you can free guys up, but inevitably then you're going to play too loose and it's, it's the push pull. It's the sea saw. It's whatever. It always comes back the other way. And what I think is interesting, we mentioned it in segment one, Torrella is not on like a long-term contract here. This may really just be, we don't, we don't even need the second half of that. Just free him up, see what they really have in him for this run. They're built to win right now, Mark Stone's not getting any younger. It can really just be, let's inject as much life as possible. And, and, and we all have fun with the Torrella caricature and a lot of it is true. But I, I've talked to a ton of players over the years that played for Torrella and players like playing for John Torrella, they like him a lot. Like his, his public persona is different than his persona in the room and they like playing hard and they want to be held accountable and they do kind of find Torrella fun to play for. Even though we watch and it's like, oh god, he's here he is playing for another overtime point. You know, and it's like we, the, the fact that he's the safest deaf guy is, it's hilarious because his teams are like deaf to watch. But players, not everybody, there are ones that, there are players that clash with him.

And when you clash with Torrella, it's more severe than when you crash, clash with a normal coach. But players like playing for John Torrella in it. The dead cat balance you get when you hire a new coach, it usually lasts a week, week and a half maybe. No, it's like a month. It's like a month now. I mean, look at some of the recent examples, Columbus with Rick bonus, that was more than a month. Detroit had two seven game win streaks in their first five, six weeks under McClellan. I get it is, it's longer than I thought. Well, we'll see because they need that. If you get a month out of this and you're winning the playoff round or two, and in that Pacific division, that's not that big of an ask. And I think that's why Vegas was so, you know, Vegas is such a ruthless organization to begin with. But they're willing to do this because they still think there is a very clear path to the Western conference final for any of these Pacific division teams in this pillow fight. You know, you win three games and you're looking pretty. It's like they're one point out of the out of first place right now. Anaheim is kind of a negative 15 gold differential. They're tied for the division like this is not a scary lineup. In Vegas knows it has the talent.

And they're just hoping that John Torturella can get it out of them. They can win the division at this point. I mean, they're they're easy back Edmonton. They just beat head up. I mean, we'll see how the oilers finish. Oilers have been hot, but the ducks, like you said, struggling. Vegas can win this division and go in and face a wild card team in round one. Like you said, they've got Seattle twice. They're in free fall. They've got Vancouver again. I mean, this is not a demanding schedule that are facing down the road. They are John Torturella is being set up to succeed here. Right. And I think when you mentioned like the players like plan for me, I think John Torturella is a is a good fit for this group of players because he's such a hockey guy. Like he's he's just like one of the players. Like when when things are going well, it feels like you've got a player coach in the team because John Torturella is just a hockey guy. And like I talked to players that have moved on from the Golden Knights that have gone to other teams and they they mentioned that there is a tenseness to the building in Vegas. And when you operate as ruthlessly as the Golden Knights have where every player like if

you have a bad month and we have a chance to upgrade from you, we will without hesitation. I don't care if you have six years left on your contract, we like it it like I remember Riley Smith had the great quote a few years back someone asked him like, are you nervous or are you thinking about your contract playing on a contract year? And he's like, this is the Vegas Golden Knights every year is a contract year. Like there's no such thing as we are always at that like that that possibility is always there. And I do think that it affects the players. I don't think it always does, but I think when they go through a bad stretch and they can't score, I think there is a tenseness to the building because of the expectations that this organization has set and because the players know that at any moment, this team will upgrade and it could be you who's getting upgraded. I think a coach like John Trotter, like Bruce Cassidy, I've said this a million times. I think it's a downgrade. I think Bruce Cassidy is a better coach period. If it was me, I wouldn't have done it. However, Bruce Cassidy is also a type of coach who can make players tense because he's

so intense with the strategy and he's so intense with the systems. Whereas John Trotter, it's just kind of a hockey guy and I think he has loosened this group up. Can he do it in the playoffs? I think it's much, much harder to do it in the playoffs when now you're facing Anaheim or Edmonton. And if you lose, what do you think this team's going to do this summer? They're going to replace half of you. So it's like the tenseness can come back when the playoffs get here, but I think Trotter Rella is built to help them with that. And Trotter Rella has mellowed in his older age. I think that's pretty clear. He's not the same coach who was in Tampa in 2004, years in the media, years was kind of becoming like a little cartoon character himself. He's kind of embraced the kind of the caricature again of him. And I do think this is a mellower, like that intensity, that fire is still there. But this is not the same guy from 20 years ago. He's also won a gold medal with a handful of guys on that Vegas bench. And I think that matters here too, the familiarity with Eichel. Even though it was a short stretch, like they've been to a battle. A major high profile battle together and won it, no a handoff in same deal.

So that could end up playing in their favor. The question I have, just to kind of tie these first two segments together, do we think that the Islanders make the move they made yesterday? If they don't see Vegas win those first three games, you know, under Trotter Rella. And if both of these two teams go into the playoffs and win around, we know how copycatalyke this is. Is this going to start being something we have to be thinking about at mid-March every single year? How many teams are going to fire their coach looking for that one final bump and win a playoff roundoff of it? I don't know. It didn't really happen after the Devils did it in the early 2000s. That was like the most extreme example and the most extreme success. And it didn't happen then. But I think this is just always like if you're a GM, if you're ownership, this is really the only card you ever have to play in the season is firing the coach. And yeah, it's a little drastic. It reeks of desperation to do it this late in the season. But you know, like you said, new coaches bring new energy.

And if you think your team has a path and nobody in the East is really all that scary, nobody in the Pacific is really all that scary. All the scary teams are in the central division right now. If you see a path and like, man, we could win two playoff rounds here. If we just make sure we get in, I understand the impetus. I do think it is, they are acts of desperation and they don't necessarily make your team better, but they might make your team more successful. And I understand the impetus. No team in the Pacific is all that scary. There is one player in the Pacific, well, there's multiple players in the Pacific that are all that scary. One of them, of course, is Conor McDavid. But one of them is also Maclin Celebrity Lazz. And at this point, I mean, we're talking awards all the time on this show at this point. It's that time. I know we're all thinking about them in the back of our minds. We try to pre-organize a ballot. Celebrity is an interesting one because a lot of voters do kind of have a block around the heart trophy. If you don't make, if your team doesn't make the playoffs, you cannot be on their ballot. You can certainly cannot be on top of their ballot tends to kind of be a rule of thumb. Man, if Celebrity doesn't feel like a worthy potential exception to that rule, though,

less. It's interesting. But we've been kind of like over the last few months saying, you know, well, Maclin Celebrity deserves some heart votes, right? He deserves some heart love. And now it's like, if they make the playoffs, if these San Jose Sharks, and if you've watched the San Jose Sharks, you know this is not a good hockey team. It's an exciting team. It's a fun team. I'm in San Jose right now. I can't wait to watch Black Hawk's Sharks night. That's going to be fun. But this is not a good hockey team. If this team is dragged into the playoffs by this 19 year old phenom, I think he becomes the favorite. And it feels like the narrative is heading that way over the last few weeks. We're seeing more and more talk about that. We love, you know, the writers vote on this and we get debate all day long about what valuable really means, right? And the most outstanding player versus the most valuable player debate, we have every year ad nauseam. But this, this is the Taylor Hollier, right? This is a player who's so much better than every one of his teammates who has so many more points than any of his teammates and dragging a team that nobody expected to make the playoffs into the playoffs.

If these sharks make the playoffs, I think McLean Celebrini wins the hard trophy this year. Yeah, I mean, Tim, Tim Marks point. It's, I think it's 106 points for Celebrini and 54 for Will Smith, who's second on the sharks. How is that even real life? It doesn't even, like in my head, I'm like, if these players were on the ice with him and he's getting all these points, like, doesn't somebody else have to get points eventually? It's pretty wild for, for, well, it's funny because his, his point gap, Celebrini is percentage of all his teams of being in on his team's goals. It's like the same as Conor McDavid's, even though that gap is that huge, it's really kind of incredible. And to me, like, I try to not make it, I definitely adhere to the valuable definition, but I still try to not make it like guy who has the worst support and cast award. Yeah. But I look at it and the fact that he's within 20 points of Conor McDavid and you look at who Conor McDavid is surrounded by and how overall good that team is even in a bad year. Like, we know how good the Edmonton Oilers are. The fact that McLean Celebrini is in that neighborhood and just watching him, you see

what a driver he is. We saw it at the Olympics. It's one of the sneaky battles of this award season is trying to keep any opinions formed in Olympic hockey out of your balloting, but I don't know how to unsee what I saw with McLean Celebrini at those Olympics where he, to me, seemed like the second best player on team Canada at 19 years old and not fazed at all by that moment. There's sometimes an award or an argument with in awards voting with players on bad teams. It's like, yeah, they have all that and they're that much better than their next best teammate because they there's no one else. They get every opportunity. They get every goal, whatever. There's a pretty easy refutation there if you're willing to just kind of glance over at the Olympic action and see, nope, he does it when he's surrounded by superstars too. Yeah. I mean, to me, the story is like Celebrini is in that tier. I was just looking at the player tier story that we did at the beginning of season. I love going through that every year and like you look at Celebrini at the use and like the third tier down and it's like, it's wild how and they were very bullish on him. Like that was a pro Celebrini to put him that high and now you look at it and it's

like he's clearly in the same tier as McDavid and Kuterov and McKinnon. Like he is that level of player and he hasn't even turned 20 yet. It's pretty wild. Our producer told us just before we started recording this that Maclin Celebrini is plus 2000 for the heart. I don't think he's the favorite right now. I still think that that belongs to either McKinnon or Kuterov. It should not be plus 2000. I'll tell you that. That should be like plus 500. I agree 100. Like that's, you know, we're not allowed to gamble on these awards. Obviously because we're voting on them, but man, I would recommend to my friends and family. There was some money on that one because I'm kidding. We are as the writing group and I don't say this is me. I like to think I'm a very meticulous voter and I spend hours and hours, you know, but we as a voting body seem to be very prone to quote unquote narrative and the narrative behind Maclin Celebrini, especially because Sidney Crosby won the heart trophy in his second year. And look at what Maclin Celebrini is doing.

Look what he did. Like you said in Milan. Look what he's doing now. If these sharks make the playoffs, I'm telling you, he has a very real chance of winning this thing. And it's interesting too, because like the McKinnon momentum was so strong for the first half of the year. There's a ticket for granted, don't we? Yes. It's a blend of like he hasn't been quite that good, but he's still been awesome. But I think most of it is just that we got people got bored of talking about how good Nathan McKinnon was. You have to fight that. You really do have to fight that when you fill out your ballot. And then I like I voted for Nathan McKinnon top of my ballot a lot. I still he's going to be very high on it one way or another. But I think especially like when I saw how much the Kutcherov conversation picked up in the last month, and certainly it's earned like Kutcherov's an awesome player. He's having an unbelievable stretch of hockey, not just for like 20 games, but for like 50 games here. But I always wonder like how much of a late season push is just the people were like, well, I don't want to have decided my our ballot in January. So let's let's, you know, extra count what's happening recently here. The abs are victims of like the team and McKinnon, like they were just so good at the

beginning of the year. I feel like they all took their foot off the gas pedal a little bit. And it'll be interesting to see if they can turn it back on in the playoffs. But it definitely seems like that team is not operating at the same level of urgency at the same, they just don't care because they're so far ahead of everyone. And they have been for months. Yeah, it's like the John Cooper Jack Adams or it's like, we take it for granted. Like, of course, Nate, the McKinnon is great. I don't want to vote for him again. And that's a, that's a lousy way of doing business here. That's not why that's not how the voting is supposed to work. But I think you're right, Max. I think there is a, you know, shiny new toy sensation where it's like, I want to vote for something different. I want to change the narrative here. And I do think that Nathan McKinnon, Conor McDavid, their victims of their own success in that way. It's funny, too, because I think there's an idea that like the hockey media is a hive mind. I think in reality, we're a collection of wannabe contrarians who don't realize that we're all being contrar, trying to be contrarian in the same way often at the same time. We all want to be first to the, the new guy, and then we all end up there. And it's like that, you know, that we're all going to vote for Kutrov.

We're all going to vote for Celebrity. And McKinnon's going to be like, you all said you were voting for me three months ago. Anyway, let's take a quick break right there. We'll come back and we'll talk about the other end of the NHL standings. All right, we are back. And some big news that happened over the weekend that obviously got a little buried by the day loose everywhere else. Buffalo Sabers are going on the playoffs last. The Buffalo Sabers have snapped a 14 year playoff drought that is very good news. Obviously, in order for it to happen, it had to be very bad news for a long time, too. But I think we could all probably feel the collective pressure release everywhere within the Rust Belt, certainly, of Buffalo fans letting their shoulders drop for the first time in a decade and a half. I loved how the Sabers kind of leaned into it, too. Like they didn't pretend like this wasn't a big deal. All the memes they were doing online, like, those are like, you know, Andy Dufrey and coming through the pipe and the rain coming down on them. They were all excited about it. I love that. But how Buffalo was it that they couldn't even celebrate it, that the night that they get

they clinched, they're down three, nothing to the capital. Six minutes in, they've lost a couple there. They're kind of sputtering down the stretch here. It's two, three and two. And even if you're a Buffalo fan and you've been waiting for this for 14 years, you're like, oh, God, we might lose in the first round. It's just until they actually do something in the playoffs, I feel like Buffalo is always going to be just doom saying fan base. But I'm so happy for them. You we talked a lot this year about how much I wanted to see a Buffalo Detroit first round series. These two fan bases being rewarded for their infinite patience this last decade plus, but Buffalo, nobody wants more. Nobody's mad at the Buffalo, like nobody hates the Buffalo Sabers, right? They're the ultimate bandwagon team. If your team isn't going to make the playoffs, who's not going to root for the Buffalo Sabers? I wonder if they become like a power. How long that lasts for just like the Florida Panthers, but I think everyone in the hockey world is excited to see Buffalo arguably only gets even arguable the best hockey market in the United States finally making the playoffs. Yeah, it's there. Everybody's second favorite team. And I said it a few weeks back.

It's like, I think the playoffs need the Sabers as bad as the Sabers need the playoffs because you look at the Eastern Conference. And to me, there's so much just like mid like there's so many teams that it's like the first round series don't have the same pop that they do in the West with we're going to get Minnesota Dallas. Like I want to see what Colorado does to me that the Western series have a little more pop to them except for Buffalo. Like Buffalo is going to be the playoff series. Everyone wants to watch because everyone wants to see this team either succeed in root form or are they going to do what Buffalo does? It's like to me, Buffalo being solidified the playoffs gives you one series in the east that you're for sure looking forward to every other night. Yeah, here's how happy I am for Buffalo. They wrote me a speeding ticket when I was there a week ago and I'm still happy for them. Normally that would be disqualifying. That would be a mental ban list for me on the New York through way. They'll get you on the through way. Yeah, exactly. It was I don't know what everything's called, but it was a. I was not pleased.

It happens, but I'm very happy for them. And on my way in, I drove by a sign that said, welcome to Lindy Ruffalo, which I love that for Lindy, too, that they're they're renaming the city, the city limit sign for him. You know, is it him? Is it a group of players finally realizing it's now or never? You know, it obviously happens at the time that they make the GM change, which probably lights as big a fire as anything under the players. Like you can you can talk about the new coach bump. If the GM who brought everybody in gets fired, everyone has to be really scared, really, you know, at least contemplating what, what is their future going to hold? And whatever it was, it seems to have really kicked them into a totally new gear. I don't want to be the Debbie down here, but should we be concerned about the Buffalo Sabers, the way they've been playing down the stretch here? Like they, they're, they're not in the situation that Colorado is in where they're just playing out the string. They were playing for, you know, positioning here. And all of a sudden they're just giving up so many goals. Their defensive shortcomings are really kind of coming to bear. The goal tenning's not there. They're not really getting bailed out the way they used to.

Should we be concerned on one of these teams that's scratching and clawing and fighting to get in kind of like the Florida Panthers a few years ago that that team is going to be able to just take it to the Buffalo Sabers who were kind of limping into the finish line here. Yes. I think that that's a real consideration. I mean, I don't, I don't know how much to totally buy some of the, the Buffalo like, oh, they play too much of a track meet hockey. Like there's certainly some of that in their game, but I also do think they have heavy players. They have two way players like their blue line is young and definitely tends toward getting the puck north really fast. I don't think it's necessarily the prototypical playoff blue line, but it's incredibly talented and when they can hem you in for days and it's hard to do in the playoffs, but they can do it. The issue is, if, if you're going to be even a little leaky in the playoffs, you got to be able to get bailed out by your goal tenning. And Alex Lyon was doing that in Ukepeca, Luke and his capable of doing that, but they haven't been getting it lately. And that is a scary situation to be in right on the doorstep of the playoffs. You're going to need your goalie to make some rush saves if you're the Buffalo Sabers playing

the way that they are. Yeah. I mean, there's definitely reason for concern just because the lack of pedigree in history with those two goalies. Like if it were, if it were a, like Ilya Sorokin who had a bad couple of weeks stretch, we would just say, however, I'm not worried. But because Alex Lyon has a history, his whole career basically, he has been a hot and cold goalie. And we talked a little bit about it when we were talking about my goalie, tandem power rankings. I think part of the reason he's so streaky is it's built into the way he plays. He is really aggressive in terms of the depth. He comes out of his blue paint to challenge. And when you do that, if you're reading the play really well, there's never any net to shoot at because you're in the right spot and you're so far out there that these shooters, there isn't a corner to be picked. But when you're not reading the play as well as you can and you're just a half beat behind, that's a way of playing that will give up a bunch of goals. So I think there's a reason he's been streaky. You need to hope that he's hot at the right time. Obviously you have UPL, who's another great option. But yes, I think there is reason for concern with the goalies.

They've been awesome. And I think that they could be awesome in the playoffs. But the fact that they're having a little bit of a cold stretch here and there's reason to see why I would be a little concerned. I am still waiting to see someone get Kevin Adams on the phone and talk to him about how he feels about all this. And I really, if the GMs had a sense of humor and a sense of defiance and any kind of, you know, fortitude, they would vote Kevin Adams GM of the year because the GMs vote on the GM of the year. It would be smarter. They want to say, don't fire us. Don't fire us. We do it. It takes a while. It's a long-term project. It's a five-year plan. It would be the absolute funniest thing if the GMs vote at Kevin Adams GM of the year. Observingly, every GM who's even a little close to that hot seat should be putting his name on the top of the ballot so they can take it to their owner and go, look, this is the situation. Just give me a little one. Just give me one more year, man. Just give me one more year. We're this close to the diamonds. We're with our pickaxes where this close to the diamonds don't do this right now. Then the owners are going to say, yeah, and they got there as soon as they fired him.

All right. So let's use that as a springboard here because I want to talk about the GM and your neck of the Woods Max. Yeah. Steve Iserman. We all know how tight he is with the organization, with the fan base, with the ownership. They are free falling in March and April again. They might miss the playoffs here. Is there any way that Steve Iserman is on the hot seat right now? Yeah. There is. It's interesting because I don't know if you tabulate the playoff drought, the second Buffalo clinches, or if it's at the end of the season, but as of now, a Buffalo does not have a playoff drought because they're in, and that means the longest playoff drought on the league belongs to the Detroit Red Wings at nine years. They could still break it this year too, but it's not trending that way. It's gone really bad for them lately. They've lost six of their last eight in regulation. It's been seven years under Iserman, and I still have a hard time seeing the LH family ever fire him. That would surprise me. But this is a collapse, and it's been a collapse for it, depending on how you want to measure

it. Was it a collapse or living, they sold at the deadline, right? Maybe that made things worse, whatever. But it's the fourth straight year that in March, they've come completely undone. There's clearly something with this group that is, it may be a different story every year, and that's what they've kind of repeated over and over when we asked them about it. It's like it's a different team. It's a different story, and there's different details to it for sure, different kind of arcs, but it's the same result year after year. I think for a general manager who's been in that job for seven years, it's kind of unavoidable that those conversations start to pick up. I don't know. Elliot Friedman floated the theory on his podcast of a bump up the Ron Francis effectively. I think that that is interesting. If you do it that way, I question what really changes. If it's still ultimately kind of the same guy at the top, even if there's a different person in the chair, it's kind of a new voice. I think it would be naive to say there's no chance of a front-off shake-up of some kind.

It's been as, this is probably as bad of a, of a collapse as they've had, and that tends to have some kind of consequence. I saw in your story, Todd McClellan, an interesting quote he's talking about, whether it's a confidence issue or a mental fortitude issue, and I'm not sure there's a huge difference between the two, but I know what he means. I've been in rooms where guys are just frustrated and feel snakebitten and feel cursed, and I've been in rooms where players are mentally weak. Which one is more likely in Detroit right now? I don't know. They have a problem going back years where when things go wrong, they go really wrong. They spiral on them, and it happened last night. They were up 1-0. They played a pretty good first period against the wild. They give up a goal 18 seconds into the second period, and then they give up three more in the next 11 minutes, like 12 minutes. That was snowball effect, and that's mostly what McClellan has eliminated from their game through most of this season. That was the biggest reason that I was willing to buy into this being a different situation

this year, even when some of the underlying numbers, some of the five on five scoring were low. It was like, yeah, but what's really killed them in past years is A, they didn't really have goal tending, which John Gibson has mostly given them this year, at least like steady true 1A consistently goal tending, and B, when they went on a losing streak, or when they lost a game, it always became a losing streak when they gave up a goal that they shouldn't have. It always became two or three goals. That was out of their game for 60 plus games this year, and it has come back at this time of year, which is something psychological seems like it has to be the answer to that. I feel like Gibson deserves more credit than he's been given league wide for the season. He's at a tough month is the thing. It's like 900 since March 1st, but I agree with you. 900s above league average. That's right. It's true. We have to redefine what's good goal tending with all these kids scoring like math and celebration every night. I haven't checked it in a couple of weeks, so maybe he has fallen behind, but I mean, for a while there, it was like since the middle of December, which is a very, very long time,

John Gibson led the NHL and save percentage since December. This isn't a month. It's been months and months and months of very good goal tending, and I wonder if maybe he was part of the reason that like you mentioned, like it covered up things. He would stop the bleeding like you'd give up a goal, but it wouldn't turn into a bunch of them because Gibson would bail you out. And I wonder if he's up there in age. It's been a while since John Gibson has played meaningful games in this time of season. It's been a while since he's played this many games in a season. I wonder if he's if he's running out of gas and isn't able to cover up some of the mistakes that he was earlier in the year. He started something like 14 consecutive games from that for that, including both ends of a back to back. He ends up getting pulled on the second half of that. So you can kind of question, I guess, some of the wisdom to that, not the back to back this weekend, the previous one, but yeah, I actually think that they want it, like maybe a little too much. Like I think it's just it's on their shoulders. It's on their faces. Like it's like this can't happen again, and I feel for them.

It's a brutal situation, but it's happening again and they have not found a way to make it stop. And the way they lost to the wild was so brutally, they do have that collapse and they come all the way back, Patrick and Dick's a bad penalty. They lose it late. I mean, it's it's almost worse to come close and then that and then when that's when you're really getting your heads, like even when we do things right, we're still coming up empty and then you start gripping the sticks to tight. These are human beings. I know we think of these are professional athletes. They have the memory of a goldfish and they can move on and flush it. They can't. These are these they understand the situation. They know the history and Detroit. They know how much this matters. They know their own history and they're feeling it every single time they hop over the boards. They're feeling the way to that no matter how veteran you are, even Patrick Kane is going out there, feeling the weight of that playoff drought right now in Detroit. Because I really think they thought this was different. I mean, Cain had a quote earlier this year that was like, I've been on good teams. This is a good team. You know, like there's there's numerous instances of the way that they've talked and been like, oh, they really believe in what they have. Steve has been traded in unprotected first round pick at this trade deadline.

That was not wise to not protect that pick, but that tells you how much he believed in this team. And I thought like for the record, I thought that was a good trade. I would always protect the first round pick, even the Florida Panthers protect their first round picks. So I'm not justifying that, but that pick looked like it was going to be like 22 at the time they made that trade. I thought that was a perfectly fine trade. So I am not, you know, changing my opinion on that a month later when it's convenient. It's just that like, I'm telling you, that's how much they thought that this was different. They were willing to trade their first round pick without protection on it. And it's just all come collapsing down on them. So it's not too late. They're two points out technically it's still there. But over the last month, they have not looked like a team that can easily make up a two-point gap with five games to play. And it looks like that by the end of this year, they may very well be the holders of the longest playoff drought in the NHL, which is insane. Like this team went, whatever, 20 something years making the playoff, they have the all-time streak for playoff. And then it wasn't like they missed it a couple years, then made it a couple years, then missed it a couple, and then started the drought.

It literally went back like they went with 20 years without missing the playoffs. And then immediately 25 and then immediately into the longest drought in the league. That's absolutely insane. It's something for the Toronto's of the world to keep in mind. Tear down rebuilds. They're long shots, man. They're really, really difficult to pull off. They take a really, really long time. They really, really test your fans' patience. You look at what Pittsburgh and Boston are doing. That's what everybody's going to want to do now. And this is fascinating that you say that, though, less, okay? Because I feel like right now both Toronto and Detroit can kind of look at each other. Spider-Man meme, right? Toronto's looking at Detroit and saying, see, this is why we can't tear it down. And Detroit, in a similar vein, has to be looking at Toronto and saying, like, we can't do something drastic with our roster here, because it doesn't always make things better. And now I think they need to do something with the roster, and let me be clear about that. There was scapegoating in Toronto that I'm starting to see bubble among the fan base in Detroit. And they want to pick a scapegoat to blame and say, we got to get this guy out, and that'll fix everything.

Look at the Toronto Maple Leafs. It will not. It will make things worse, and you will be in a worse situation a year from now. That's not to say, run it back. I'm not saying copy Toronto, because that obviously wasn't working either. But that's how bad a situation you get to when you're in this spot, where you have this hump that you can't seem to get over. And you want to be like, okay, just change this, and it'll all fix it, or blow it all up. You can blow it all up, and you can do this whole thing again. It's the worst spot you can possibly be in the NHL. I love how the Toronto Maple Leafs have become the cautionary tale in all situations. They tanked, it didn't work. They ran it back a hundred times, and it didn't work. It seemed like it worked, and then it didn't work. It didn't work, but then they kept running it back, and that didn't work. And then they're like, okay, we're going to get tough now. We're not going to be a skilled team. They're going to retool on, and then that didn't work. Like, no matter what you're doing, you can look at Toronto Maple Leafs and go, oh God, we're screwed. Yeah, which era of Toronto Maple Leafs don't you want to be is the ultimate question? I know, it's crazy. It's crazy. There's a lot, there's a lot there. I mean, we could do a whole podcast on the Red Wings, but I think we should probably wrap there for today.

Thanks for doing this to both of you, and thanks to you all for listening to this episode of the Athletic Hockey Show. All the shons you want, none you don't, Frankie Carrotto, all with you on Wednesday. We'll talk to you soon.

More episodes

More from The Athletic Hockey Show

View all episodes →