
About this episode
OA1058
We begin with Neil Gorsuch’s recent appearance on Fox News. How normal is it for a sitting Supreme Court justice to go on Fox News, and did Gorsuch really just threaten the Biden administration over its relatively minor court reform proposals?
In our main story, we break down two major antitrust suits from the past week: Elon Musk’s ridiculous claim that corporations which refuse to advertise on a social media platform which has failed to regulate neo-Nazi and animal abuse content are violating Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, and District Court judge Ahmet Mehta’s extremely reasonable findings that Google’s anticompetitive practices are in violation of Section 2. Also, Matt has some nice things to say about Richard Nixon.
-
White House announcement on Biden court reform proposals (7/29/24)
-
"GARM's Harm" report from the House Judiciary Committee (7/10/2024)
-
“Is Google Getting Worse? A Longitudinal Investigation of SEO Spam in Search Engines” J. Bevendorff and M. Wiegmann, et al., Leipzeig University (2024)
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!
Get every episode summarized
Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Opening Arguments

Most Lindsay Clancy Coverage Has the Law All Wrong
Opening Arguments

ICE Went Undercover To Expose a Vast Antifa "Conspiracy"
Opening Arguments

Supreme Court Says Why Prevent Trump Violating the Constitution Before It Even H...
Opening Arguments

Meta Must Pay, Bannon's Judge Pushes Back, and a Dolly Parton Shoutout from the...
Opening Arguments