
About this episode
The verdicts of “ratings agencies” such as the GDI, within the complex machinery that serves online ads, are a little-understood mechanism for controlling the media conversation. In UnHerd’s case, the GDI verdict means that we only received between 2% and 6% of the ad revenue normally expected for an audience of our size. Meanwhile, neatly demonstrating the arbitrariness and subjectivity of these judgements, Newsguard, a rival ratings agency, gives UnHerd a 92.5% trust rating, just ahead of the New York Times at 87.5%.
So, what are these “ratings agencies” that could be the difference between life and death for a media company? How does their influence work? And who funds them? The answers are concerning and raise serious questions about the freedom of the press and the viability of a functioning democracy in the internet age.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time UnHerd with Freddie Sayers publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from UnHerd with Freddie Sayers

Adrian Wooldridge: Why Labour should keep Starmer
UnHerd with Freddie Sayers

The stage is set for a new WWI
UnHerd with Freddie Sayers

Orbán's defeat is not a liberal victory
UnHerd with Freddie Sayers

Iain McGilchrist: How to escape left-brain thinking
UnHerd with Freddie Sayers