About this episode
On today’s episode, David and Sarah break down the most interesting Supreme Court argument of this term and what it means for the future of double jeopardy law. But first, they have to shout out the dating site that is the AO comment section. Also on the docket:
-Mistrials vs. double jeopardy
-Federal rights and state interpretations
-The coolest word you've never used
-David calls for thoughtful comments
-How to lose with valor at SCOTUS
-Fifth circuit on the brain
-A second bite of the Rahimi apple
-Revealing AO's next long-awaited guest
Show notes:
-SNL: Weights and Measures with Nate Bargatze
-McElrath v. Georgia
-Blockburger v. United States
-Fifth Circuit and Rahimi
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Advisory Opinions publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Advisory Opinions
Justice Alito Stays Ruling on Abortion Pill by Mail
Advisory Opinions
May 5, 20261:18:59pending
Gutting the Voting Rights Act | Interview: Judge Roy K. Altman
Advisory Opinions
Apr 30, 20261:24:21pending
Arguing In Front of SCOTUS | Interview: Lisa Blatt
Advisory Opinions
Apr 28, 20261:15:07pending
Overturning Religious Precedent
Advisory Opinions
Apr 23, 20261:28:11pending