Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsAug 23, 20267:49pending

How evaluating criminal responsibility in court works (extended interview)

About this episode

How do experts determine whether someone is or isn't criminally responsible for their actions? In this "The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential" extended interview, Dr. Stephanie Hansen, a forensic psychologist and expert on conducting those evaluations, including at Tewksbury Hospital, shares her experience, her thoughts on the relationship between analyst and subject, how psychosis and postpartum psychosis affect people and more. You can watch the TV version of this episode — and all the others, as well as video from court as it happens — on our YouTube page. Subscribe here: www.youtube.com/@NBC10Boston If you have questions on the case, send them to us at [email protected] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Karen Read Murder Trial: Canton Confidential publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

How evaluating criminal responsibility in court works (extended interview)

The Karen Read Murder Trial: Canton Confidential

0:00
7:49

More episodes

More from The Karen Read Murder Trial: Canton Confidential

View all episodes →