
He Won't Talk About the Victim—So I Did It for Him
About this episode
At sentencing, arguments based on personal hardship—like prison shortening your life expectancy—won't earn you credibility. One individual I spoke with planned to cite a study showing that two years in prison equals one year off a person's life. That kind of reasoning doesn't just fall flat—it can backfire. Judges want to see accountability, not self-pity. If you can't answer, "What would my victim say to me?"—you're not ready. Real mitigation starts with acknowledging the harm you caused and building a plan that reflects that understanding.
Join our weekly webinar every Monday at 1PM Pacific / 4PM Eastern.
Get every episode summarized
Each time White Collar Advice publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from White Collar Advice

Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Why You Don't Have a Math Problem
White Collar Advice

The Executive Who Practiced His Apology for Weeks and Still Got 18 Extra Months
White Collar Advice

How to Hire a Lawyer: What Good Lawyers Do Differently
White Collar Advice

What Are the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and How Do They Work?
White Collar Advice