Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
educationNov 10, 202541:42pending

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?

About this episode

Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist (No. 24-724), argued November 4, 2025. In this case, the Justices examine whether a federal appellate court must vacate a district court's final judgment when it later concludes the case was improperly removed because a non-diverse defendant was wrongly dismissed at the outset—pitting strict jurisdictional rules against the need for finality in complex product-liability litigation. Hear counsel and the Court test the limits of Caterpillar v. Lewis, diversity jurisdiction, and what happens when federal courts try to fix their mistakes after the fact.

Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.

#HainCelestial #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #DiversityJurisdiction #CrimeTalk

Get every episode summarized

Each time Crime Talk with Scott Reisch publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

0:00
41:42

More episodes

More from Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

View all episodes →