Gutsy Women: Erin Far from Eden

0:00Good afternoon and welcome to the UK Column Viewers. Now, this afternoon I have an addition of my gutsy women series and I'm really, really pleased to have a lady called Erin joining me today. And Erin has a YouTube channel. She's been putting out some really interesting information. The channel is called Far From Eden. And Erin, welcome to the UK Column. Thank you. Thank you for having me. Now, you're in the United States. Are you able to give us a rough idea where you are in the United States? Because that's always interesting for the UK audience. I am in the Southern United States. So, I think that you guys are probably aware of Southern rather than Midwest or, you know, the West Coast, the Southern United States.

1:06Yeah. Okay, that's fine. Well, I hope you're in the Southern part of the US. There's got some decent weather because relations that we've got in relations. We've got in the States send us regular texts and whatsapps and telegram and it always blue sky. And sometimes I am a bit jealous about that. Erin, here we are. I made an approach to you. I've been watching some of your excellent YouTube talks and interviews. And I've seen you interviewed by the people. And for me, it was fascinating because for about four months, maybe six months, I've been drawn towards the subject of women in society and things not perhaps going as well as they should do. I've seen some other people speaking on various topics about women. One is lady called Pearl,

2:07or I'm sure you know, got a very big audience, but it was really interesting for me that when I started to look at this area, I was seeing both men and women talking about it. So I'll say that although some of the channels discuss what we are about to discuss in different styles and some of them are harder than others, I thought it was very encouraging that when we looked across social media on YouTube, there were both men and women and men talking about this subject. And one evening when I was looking at a couple of the streams, your channel came up and I watched the first of your talks. And that got me very interested and eventually I got to the point where I thought I'd like to really like to interview this lady because you are clearly in a difficult

3:07field. You're talking some very tough things to a very big audience which is essentially women in the United States and worldwide. And this takes some courage and some guts and I thought I think Erin is a good candidate for my gutsy women series. So thank you very much for responding and joining me. Now we had a very, very brief chat before we started this interview, recorded interview. And I wonder whether I can just ask you a little bit about yourself only as much as you care to choose. But you are talking essentially about women in society and you're putting feminism on trial. When did you start getting interested in this subject and deciding you wanted to presumably research it more?

4:09It's a little uncomfortable, not for me to share but I think for people to hear how it really got started. And it was really the catalyst was when my mother passed away. I was very close with her. I lived with her having multiple sclerosis. She helped me help me take you know take care of me, etc. And then she passed away at the end of 2015. And I had to you know make do for myself, etc. But also my brain started to see things differently. For example, I started to see my childhood through a different lens. And it her passing on ice, ice, I still love her very much. But her passing on helped me see her in a different lens. And it helped me see what my father's experience was in a very, in a much more real way.

5:14And the opening of your eyes, like that moment, everybody has that moment where the veil is lifted. And that was really the beginning of it. And I started to see then not just my dad, but I started to see the experience of men that I knew, family members, friends that I was meeting for the first time. And they were sharing their experiences of what it was like to be married, what it was like after they got divorced, how low they got. And I got very, very interested in it. And I recognized also what that feminism had been a great big lie, that to go out and prioritize yourself and go and get a job and all that. And you can do anything a man can do. That was all basically a lie. And so I wanted to get to the bottom of that. And I was angry that, you know, it's sort of, feminism had lied to me about what the man's experience was because

6:18supposedly it's so easy for a man. Life is so easy for a man, you know, they get to do all these things. And they don't have the trials and tribulations that we have as women. And I found it to be the exact opposite. So it was sort of like a wave that hit me in those first couple of years about 10 years ago. And it just hasn't stopped. And the discovery hasn't stopped. And it's become a message that I feel is my responsibility to share. I want to wake women up who were kind of asleep mentally as I was for their own sakes because I love women, not because I hate them. And I want to speak up for men because we live in such a world that any, any grievance that a man has is put down is belittled. And they, they just don't have a voice. So that's kind of how it got started in

7:20the first few years. And then eventually had to make a YouTube channel. Yeah. And a very, very good YouTube channel. It is. Thank you. Thank you. When you realize something was wrong, where, and you say it was alive, where did you go looking for information that helped teach you and perhaps reinforce the idea that it was alive? My own experiences and my own eyeballs literally like I didn't go to research or papers or experts because those are all the same people who lied to me. So I started saying, all right, what is the real experience? What do people really say? I've lived a whole life where just making fun of a man, men or trash, anything a man can do a woman can do better. All of these things, every movie, every song, every commercial. I, all I had to do

8:27was that and go, it was right in front of my face this whole time. I looked back at my dad's experience. I looked at family members experiences that I just couldn't see before. And I looked at all the lies that women in my life had basically propagated like, oh, you should never depend on a man, he's probably going to leave you. He might start abusing you. And I'm like, that's not the nature of most men. So for the most part, it was myself and my own reflection. And then I, when I started my YouTube channel, I didn't even watch YouTube. I wasn't even aware of the other channels in the very beginning. I wasn't. And then I finally started in the first year or so of being on YouTube myself, watching other content creators like myself.

9:29Better Bachelors, one of them, Terrence Pop is another one. I've been on Better Bachelors show. I've had Terrence Pop on my show. And those names are given to me by men in my life that I had started actually listening to. It's amazing what a woman can learn when she starts actually listening to men. This is so fascinating for me because I'll say gently, I'm a lot older than you. And so I've got my particular life experiences. You are the age that you are, plus you're a woman. And you are talking about suddenly coming into the realization that things that you were told and believed about being a woman and a woman's role were not correct. From my research over the last six months, I put that against my overall lifetime. That's very, very recently. And I was just fascinated that I was listening to people talking about this, talking about women, talking about men, talking about relationships and saying

10:34some things changed and it's not right. And the number of times that I found that this was answering things that I'd been puzzled about. Some of it for many years and some of it more recently because I think that what you are seeing, what we are seeing, which perhaps I can loosely call a breakdown in the relationship between men and women, it's accelerating. Whatever it is that's happening is accelerating. And I can certainly say that in my own experience as a man, I know that many men in the present day are very, very wary of women, particularly in a professional setting. So they will not be themselves. They'll be a very restricted sense of themselves. Humor has disappeared in many places because humor, it's easy to say something that is a joke,

11:42but it's taken in the wrong way. And now jokes and things that are taken in the wrong way can have serious implications in workplace law, for example, or whatever. So I have found it just so interesting to be my age, to be looking back over my life and the way society has changed and to be concerned. And now in 2025, 2026, I go onto the internet and I find people a lot younger who are also saying, hey, something's not right. This is a very positive thing, I think. I agree. I agree. I am actually 47. Oh, excuse me. Oh my goodness, I'm 48. I don't know why I'm starting to delete birthdays. That's right. I do remember a very, you could look at it as a very different time, but I understand, you know, my father is 75. So his life experience is obviously

12:47very different. I talk a lot about different generations on my channel because I can see that first of all, their experiences are different, of course, but also their reactions to what's going on in the changes, right? Because their experiences are different, they're experiencing this, what I call entropy. It's basically, you know, it's a downward trajectory quickly and a destruction of really what made the West the West, which is the nuclear family with the father's role and the mother's role and the priority of raising children for the next generation. And that is something that's obviously falling apart and it's falling apart because of amongst other things, but the destruction of their relationship and their dynamic between men and women. And I couldn't help but think as you were speaking to say that it's important to

13:48recognize that yes, you can really see like 44% of young men don't even want to date at all. They don't want to approach a woman, I should say. 44% of young men don't even want to approach a woman. And yes, you're absolutely right about men in the workplace. There are so many men in the workplace that will not be alone in a room with a woman like a conference room or in her office because, you know, the whole Me Too movement believe all women. That's so dangerous for men. It's been absolutely destructive. But this all is a symptom of a cancer that has been growing for quite a while, very much like a stage four cancer. You finally get a symptom like stage four long cancer, colon cancer, whatever. Those are good examples of you're finally getting a symptom. But at that point, you're like, oh gosh, we're so far gone. But I did a study on my channel studying

14:53a book called The Decline of the American Mail. It was written in the 1950s. And it was talking about the decline of the American mail then. And it was making the case that this is the beginning of sort of corporate America where the man goes and works for this corporation, this company. And in a way, he completely loses his identity, his own thoughts, because now he has to sort of go along to get along in this corporation. Meanwhile, wife is at home demanding things like dishwashers and a nicer place. And the whole keeping up with the Joneses began then, at least here in America. And let me know if any of these phrases don't compute across the pond. But it was like keeping up with neighbors. Oh, look, she's got this. I need to have that. So the woman was cracking the whip

15:54on the man. You need this promotion. We need to move here, et cetera, et cetera. And she was the one at home all the time, meaning he was gone. And for many of us, we'll say, well, of course, that's just how it works. He has a job. But it really wasn't that long ago into the course of human history when you didn't have like jobs, you had family farms, you had, you know, town shops where you've got a blacksmith and you've got a baker or what have you. But in general, those shops were attached to family homes. So it wasn't like that is a way. And woman is completely in charge of the house and completely raising the children, which separated the father from being the leader of the home and saying, these are the rules of our households. This is how the house of whatever the last name is will be run. And that started at least in the 20th century. Right. Now, Erin, I can imagine there'll be some people listening and watching this who will

17:00already be starting to get prickly, probably ladies, because we've come in from the angle of women. We're not going to take too much notice of that because we've got a lot more to discuss. And ultimately, you know, my view on this is we're trying to identify, identify something which is destroying the relationship between men and women. So we're not targeting women over and above men, because there is, there is two sides to this. And then they turn it into a competition between us, between men and between women, right? Where we're sort of in the same space and we're competing against one another. And that's when the roles disappear. And that is what brought men down and devalued them. Let's set the scene a little bit with figures and statistics

18:02because facts and figures are always very important. Yes. Now, you correct me. What I've picked up from my research to date is that in the US, the divorce rate is now over of marriages over 50%. Yes. And overwhelmingly, the divorce is initiated by women. Yes. We've also got the increasing breakdown of partnerships. So we've got a couple of men and a woman who were together as partners, but even those partnerships are breaking down. And then the statistics show that when people try and reestablish themselves in either a marriage or a partnership, the probability of breakdown of that new relationship is even greater. So we've got the decline in stable partnerships. And then when people have a second go at it or a

19:08third go, or maybe fourth or fifth for some of them, they are not managing to hold down a stable relationship. And do you want to comment on that? Do those figures match what do you believe? Absolutely. They do. It's up to 90% of the time the woman is initiating the divorce if she has a higher degree, like a PhD, right? It's 70% without a higher degree. Oops, sorry. But I find that interesting. But also, many times on my channel, I talk about we have to recognize a common denominator. If you're going through life and your relationships are failing, perhaps it's you. Well, you know what I mean? Yes. So we see that a lot where it's like, let me break up the relationship. Let me destroy the family because I think it's him over there or I think it's her

20:10over there, even. I'm sure in times. But in reality, it's like, we need to look at ourselves and take responsibility for our own happiness, for our own fulfillment and not look at it like it's that person's responsibility or that we're entitled to it in the first place. So the stats, I think reflect what I'm saying there very much. Right. Okay. So if I throw to you some comments from me as a male, about changes that I've seen in women over over my lifetime. And well, if I go back to 1970, I'm on, say I go back to 72, then I can say, right, as an adult. But it's to me, it's been very clear that women have become much harder than they used to be. Or certainly you feel as a male, you feel that in speaking to them in recent times over what

21:20my memory says it was. Also seen in immense change in the dress code, which many people would say, well, you know, so what? But I'm just going to flag it up because we've seen women going from essentially being dressed in a modest way. And the dress code that demonstrates their feminism. I see what you're saying. Yeah. That's, that has changed. Now we've got to be careful because, of course, in the 1920s, I think I'm right in saying that sort of trousers suits came in for women that women started high-class women. I think I can see little caricatures of them wearing trousers. But, but really prior to that, women were certainly wearing dresses. And if I think of under time where I always look at, with those pictures of the public and you think, wow, that's really

22:21interesting, Edwardian times when the Edwardians were out. It might be a special event, but quite often it would be the Sunday when people dressed up in order to be out on the street. And the ladies were always in what looked to be very wonderful long dresses and presumably they were of a quality commensurate with the income of the family. But you looked at the women, you could identify the women very clearly because they looked feminine. And they were dressed as women in a very feminine way. And then over the years we have seen the adoption of trousers. Now, part of that for me is what started to happen during the Second World War because a lot of women were drawn into the factories. It was happening in UK and also America. Then, understandably, perhaps for a health

23:23and safety reason, women were coming out of long dresses and they were getting into overalls. But of course, the moment they did that, they were becoming more man-like in their in their dress code. And then we've gone into a modern dress code where predominantly women wearing jeans or trousers and the dresses taken a backstage position. So, something has driven that code which has encouraged, in my view, women to adopt more male clothing. And that's something that's happened alongside the push to say, well, to be a mother is not, that's not a sort of life ambition. You're much better off getting that degree and going into the company and becoming the chief executive and wearing the power suit. Right. Absolutely. Absolutely. And didn't Queen Elizabeth herself work as

24:26a mechanic during World War II and have the dress, you know, like mechanic wear, right? I think there was a picture taken which, yes, which showed in, yeah. I looked at that and I said, well, there's some propaganda for you. I really think that we have, this is something that opened my eyes as well. And this is related to what you just said. When I was in college, because I did go for a bit, I took a film class, just sort of like, well, you need an elective. So that sounds interesting. And one of the things that they showed us, because we were looking at early film, was Russian propaganda films. Like, oh, look at this propaganda, et cetera, et cetera. And I thought, wow, that's, that's awful. I can't believe the people didn't realize this was propaganda. Thank goodness we don't have that. And then as I started waking up, as I'm getting older, I was like, why would I think that we don't have that?

25:30Why would I think that, oh, well, we're America. We're the West. We don't do that. We're better than that. And I thought, no, we absolutely do that. We're just better at it. It's called movies and entertainment in Hollywood and, you know, looking at people magazine and the stars and Queen Elizabeth with her own mechanic and our famous sign, you can do it. You know that, but Rosie the Riveter, right? And it turns out, and I can't remember the, the stat I wish I could, but it's a low percentage lower than a lot of people would think of women that actually did go into the workforce for World War II, at least in the United States. We are meant to believe here in the United States that, oh, my goodness, so many women went out into the workforce. And that's just not true. There were plenty of older men that didn't get drafted that we're still working in the workforce. And there's tons of jobs that women can't even do because we don't have the physical strength.

26:30But the propaganda is that, oh, yeah, we went out and we won. We are just as important as at winning the war as the men. And that's just not true. Interesting. You said that you can remember some, I would call propaganda of women in the 20s with like trousers on here in the States. What we the propaganda from the 20s for us is the flappers wearing the shorter skirts. Listening to jazz. And that was exciting. And you could even see in the show Downton Abbey, which I believe was mostly in the Edwardian time, you know, with the original. And then, oh, goodness, I can't remember her name, but the main character daughter cut her hair up to here. And that was very much a style of the flappers. And absolutely, they should have made a bit, I look back and I'm like Downton Abbey was completely propaganda too. Well, because I'm not surprised. Shopping your hair like that. If the daughter had

27:35actually done that in a family like that, chopped her hair to here. Oh, that would have been the father would have said, absolutely not. What are you doing? This is embarrassing, et cetera. So, but they want us to believe our history is different. They want us to believe that that those trends were happening more widespread than they actually were. You said 1972. My mother graduated high school in 1972 and also got married in the same year. She's pictured in her high school. Your your book has most individual. And they have a picture of her walking the train tracks and she's wearing jeans. In 1972, in the south, wearing trousers, jeans, what have you, was a no-no. That was like, oh boy, look at you, you're a REPL. And all these trends that you were saying, whether it's the manner of dress, whether it's

28:35the hardening of women, all of that is all a result, in my opinion, of a rebellion, a rebellion against who we actually are. It's a rebellion and it is a somehow an attempt for whatever reason, feminism teaches us that in order to be better, we have to be more like men. And to me, that is that if anything's hateful to women or misogynistic feminism is, because it says, in order to be a better woman, you have to actually be more like a man. And also the one thing that women can do, the biggest contribution that we can make to all of humanity is to bring forth life. We have the ability to literally grow a human being in our bodies and then feed it with our bodies. And so feminism teaches us that no, you need to be more like a man in all ways. And that makes you better. And also the one thing that makes you uniquely a woman is something you

29:43should look down upon with disdain. So if any movement or anybody is downplaying women, devaluing women, hating women, it's feminists and feminism. They just don't realize it because they believe all the propaganda. Where do I start? Because I have so many things to come back on that. No, no, it's absolutely great. The first thing I'll just pick up on is you, I think then your head, you are still thinking, where does this come from? Where is this? Oh, I'm sorry, yes. Where is this rebellion come from? Yes. And you mentioned the Bolsheviks. And I listened to your really excellent interview with, I've got it here, Brian Martinez from Badger Live Streams. That was back in May last year. And you just touched on that subject. And I was fascinated. Let's

30:51just tell the story this way. When I was at the beginning of my becoming aware of the life, what the world wasn't quite as I believed it, I was given a book and the book was called the EU Collective Enemy of its Member States. So it was a book about the politics of the European Union. You can still buy it, but it's very expensive and difficult to get hold of. The day I sat down in the chair to read it, I got about four pages into the book. And there was a table. And the table was set out, so there were three sections. So the three steps were demoralisation, destabilisation, creation of a new society. And on the left hand side was a column of different things in society. There was education, there was health, there was law and order, there was

31:51military, there was politics. And then the centre column was what would be done to those areas. And the third column was what the result would be. Now if I just took an easy one that I can remember with politics, it said the politics was to be made aggressive. And it was to become complex. So policies were to be tied up with overseas partnerships. And there would be a lack of clarity in politics. That was one of the things. It said that for health, the masses were going to be fed junk food. And this was going to destroy their health and well-being. For education, education was just going to be made a desert. So that children had no base,

32:52they had no real education, they couldn't really make decisions. And for me, when I picked up on was women, sorry, it was the military, where it said women in the military and also homosexuals in the military. And what was the outcome of this weakening of the military and military resolve? I read the full list. And when I got to the end, I just found myself thinking, my goodness, this is happening around us. We're here. We're here already. And I then read the book, which is worth reading, if you ever get hold of it, it's read detail. It's going to make sure I get the name of it from you. You can still get it online as a PDF, but it's not as easy to read, obviously, or I don't think so. But this was one of the first steps where I saw women in relation to the

33:57military as a means of undermining the military. Absolutely. I was so keen to get in this discussion with you because I want to say some things to you to see what your reaction is. So I was serving in the Raw Navy. I was a naval officer from 1972 to 1993. And in 1991, 1991, about that period, two key decisions were made. One is that they removed all the laws banning homosexual activity in the Raw Navy. And I'll just say, obviously, gay people had been in the military for a very long time, but they had to be very careful because if they were found out, they were going to be exposed and ultimately thrown out to the military. So that law was relaxed. And so, the gays were accepted in the military. And I quickly say, I work with gay people and I can have

35:04a good dialogue with them, but we'll come back onto why I have concerns about what was happening. The other one was that they made a ruling that the wrens, so that was the specialist, the women's Royal Naval Service. Those girls were going to be allowed to go to see in the ships. And because I had a job that was training ships and that involved going on board warships, most of them British, but also other NATO ships, I was able to see the impact of the girls coming on board the warships. We were told that this was going to be a good thing because it was factually true that the average academic qualification of the girls was higher than the intake for the males. And so, one of the things that was said quite often was, well, the girls are going to help bring up the standard on board because of their intellect and

36:11their education. However, what I witnessed was the complete opposite. And the dynamic of introducing women on board a warship, a steel box with a lot of young men, cooped up for long periods of times. And very quickly, you could see the girls using all of their wily female powers in order to get what they wanted or manipulate. And part of that was me seeing what I'd last witnessed at school, which was, of course, the girls tended to go for the older boys. So, the girl in one year group would, in my experience, focus on the boys a year above them. So, those boys presumably more mature and more attractive to the girls. And transposed into a military scenario, this meant that the girls went up a rank or two ranks. And therefore, you had relationships

37:17quickly starting, which absolutely destroyed the rank structure and the basic system of discipline. And that was also coupled with the fact that despite the fact there was a no touch rule, very quickly sexual relationships formed. And in some cases, those relationships were conducted on board the ships themselves. And that then led to many, many exposure articles coming into the British press, where captains had had inappropriate relationships with female junior sailors, or it had been a cross-rank, but nevertheless, what you saw was that the stability of an all-male military service had been absolutely fragmented by the introduction of the females.

38:18And the other story I want to say to you is on one occasion, I was on board one of our aircraft carriers. And I was going from a particular part of the ship up to the bridge, which involves going up a very long staircase. I'll call it a spiral staircase, because it was sort of moving around. As I was coming up the steps, there were three possibly four female ratings about half a flight in front of me, and they were talking. And what I heard them discussing was how many men they had had during the recent run ashore. And one girl was particularly pleased with herself, because she said she'd had four men in one evening. That was her special night, and the implication to me from the conversation was that that was a good night. There'd been other

39:21men in other nights. Now, at that stage, I'd never heard the expression of body count, but what I was really interested in and what was in my head was these girls are going to bring up the intellectual standard, whereas in fact, something very different was happening. So I've given you those two recollections of my time in the military. I'm interested in your response. Well, I think it's quite obvious that when you put a bunch of women aboard a ship, the hierarchy of the men and the way they organize it changes, because when it's just men, it's based on your competency. That's how you move up the ranks, and that's how you organize your respect and everything for one another. It's based on competency. And for the women, now, is it, yes, it's going to coincide. It's based on also how many women you

40:28can get. But now, are you looking at the, I don't know if you'll call them, like first mate, second mate? Do you call them that? Or no? In the Royal Navy. Do you call it, like, captain, and then... Well, it would normally be captain, and then first lieutenant, or seconding command. My father was in the British merchant marines. So I'm used to hearing first mate, second mate. Yes. What have you? But, yeah, those are based on competency, but then when the women are trying to, trying to, as they say nowadays, shoot their shot with the higher ranking men, now it sort of changes, like, okay, well, he now has all the women. And that adds a whole different dynamic. Also, I will say, isn't it so funny? Gosh, we're so messed up about what makes us valuable as a woman. These women are all standing there, discussing their escapades,

41:30and they're doing so to brag. They are trying to establish their hierarchy. That's what you witnessed. Is women trying to establish their hierarchy by basically, well, I slept with this guy and this guy and this guy. I bet that's better than the guy you can get, because even to this day, women are just now learning that not to be crude, but men will sleep with whoever. Do you know what I mean? They're not going to be picky, not like women are. So women will say, well, I have this body count. And the reason they'll say it sort proudly, at least a couple of years ago, is because they think that makes them more valuable because they can have this conquest. They are adopting a sort of James Bond mentality of look at all the women. He's a, you know, he's a ladies man, et cetera, as if that makes a person more valuable. And the thing is that if you

42:32ever would like to be a wife, if you ever want to be actually chosen by a man for more than a night, those things do not make you more valuable at all. You've already devalued yourself by spreading yourself out. Yes. And now, you know, well, a lot of men have say, if we're comparing it to, I don't know, an article of clothing like shoes, a lot of men have tried you out. Well, I will say to the ladies, what pair of shoes would you like? Do you go to a used shoes store or do you like shoes that are brand new on the shelf? And every woman would say to you, I don't want some shoes that like five, 10,000 people have worn. Well, of course, duh, it makes them less valuable. They're going to have more scuffs and would have you because of the trauma. And I bet you those women who said those things, whoever their future husbands were, did not know that that was

43:39how they were. And I will also address the education part of it. The reason, in my opinion, that those women, you know, were had better academic scores would have you is because academics, as we know it, the school system, the whole process of it is tailored more to the way women learn, men learn by doing, men learn by being active, right? Women learn by sitting still and listening to the teacher ahead of them and writing quietly and whatever. And for a boy, a young man, that's absolute torture. It isn't that the women are smarter. It's that the system that supposedly makes them smarter is absolutely tailored for them to do better on tests. It's rigged. It's absolutely rigged. And the idea of competency on a ship, if you're going to tell me that your ability

44:42to take a test or not. No, the amount of decisions my father had to make aboard a British merchant marine ship as second mate and first mate over the years were had to be made in an emergency situation. It had to be the sense of spatial things because they had cargo and you had to organize and it had to be quick. These are not things that a person who can take a test very well and sit quietly is necessarily going to be good at. The idea of book smarts and real world street smarts are two very different things and having real world street smarts does not mean that you don't have the information that is in that test. It actually might mean that you can apply it better. So I get very animated about the whole, you know, well, women or graduate women are outperforming men because they're getting more college degrees. And at this point, I'm like, oh, good. So you're

45:43saying that women are more indoctrinated because the education system, both, you know, private public, you know, from kindergarten to university, I will say tells you what to think, not how to think. And this is not conducive to an intelligent male. They will be medicated. They will be, you know, they will be in trouble. All of those things, some of the brightest at my father, my father, one of the reasons, sorry, one of the reasons I'm so excited about this, one of the reasons I'm so passionate about this is because my father, who was born in 1950, grew up in England, all the rest of it, born in Brighton, uh, Raisin London, he was asked to leave school at 15. He didn't go to college or university, he went to the merchant marines at like 18. The man rose through the ranks of society without finishing school,

46:48without college, without all of that, he could build, you know, like he built our pool shed, right, that whole structure, new blueprints, you know, anything. When he was in the merchant marines, sorry, I'll stop bragging about my dad in just a second, when he was in the merchant marines, as second mate, it was his job to navigate. He navigated by the stars, by the stars and mathematics. The man is one of the smartest people, if not the smartest person I've ever known. And if you're going to, at that time, tell him to outperform some chick academically, he's not going to do it. But I learned not to put any, any credence into that at all. Yeah, Aaron did this. This is, this is very, very interesting discussion. I'm just going to move on a little bit,

47:49because there are so many things to talk about here. What I'm hoping to do with this interview with you is to take the lid off Pandora's box for the UK column audience, because I'm pretty sure that some people are going to be watching this and they're going to be saying, oh my goodness, I wasn't quite sure what was coming, and they will be recognising things they've experienced, but there are just so many parts to it. If we say that somebody somewhere made the decision to bring women to see, I'm curious, or into the military, who made that decision and why, and I can tell you that I know very, very senior level, there were a lot of people who were very, very wary of this. They were against it, for what I think were lots of good reasons.

48:54But politically, the agenda was the women were going to go into the military. And even today, around the world, it's been shown that you can't, you are not going to put large numbers of women in a combat position, particularly in a physical combat position, the army, or the Marines, or the special forces. And we keep being told it's going to happen, we keep being told some people are trialing it, but the reality is it's never working, and it's never working because the tough jobs require very tough men to do it. And I sit here, as my joke is a vertically challenged man, so I'm not really tall, and I would be so foolish to think that as a male, I could go up against some of the really big powerful men who are the men that do these very tough military jobs.

49:57I recognise that, it would be stupid of me to put myself forward to do it, even in my younger days when I was a lot fitter. However, women can have these roles. So if the decision was made politically and common sense across a wide spectrum of people said that this is a really bad decision, we've got a malicious political policy being enforced in order to destroy the capability not only of the military in UK, but Western, NATO, US, military. So somewhere, somebody's got an agenda where they're enforcing policies to destroy the military, and if I just remind the audience of the table I described from Christopher's story was the author of the book. The EU collective, he also said that other areas of society were going to be attacked

51:03in a variety of ways, such as poor food in order to destroy the health and well-being. And I believe we're clearly seeing that, and therefore it's reasonable to say somebody has created this malevolent policy. You mentioned the Bolsheviks. I'm just going to say my research says, well, we then have to say who created the Bolsheviks. And perhaps we have to get into a little bit of a more murky area where we go back. We'll throw in the Tava Stock School of Psychologists in Germany who were coming out with some very destructive policies. But perhaps we can just get the audience to reflect on if nasty things are happening, and the breakdown of relationships between men and women has got to be short of attacking children. The breakdown of relationships between men and women has got to be in my mind one of the most vicious attacks going. We need to be thinking who

52:10is promoting this type of policy and who's behind it. But we can't do all of that in this discussion. Well, I can go a little longer than, you know, what I originally said totally up to you. But, uh, yes, I'll say you can't have communism without feminism. You just can't. The two go hand in hand. But how like marks, right? He, the idea of communism as far as, you know, published or what have you was 1848, I believe, right? And we didn't have actual communism as far as I know until about 1918 around then with the Bolsheviks in Russia. So why there was such a long time there. Why couldn't that ever happen well?

53:14Feminism started to be even a worldwide movement. The United States, the females got the vote in 1920. I think that they got it earlier in the UK, maybe 1918, 1919. So it's interesting. But the first thing the Bolsheviks did, one of the very first things they did was take the authority away from the church and give it to the state. For example, no fault the force. Many people don't realize that when you move, you know, the idea of marriage from being governed by a church to the state, which most people don't even realize that the state governing marriage is pretty much a brand new thing. And Russia, the Bolsheviks were like, yes, of course, this is what we need. And one of the first things they instituted was no fault divorce. Interesting that that would be such a priority. But they did that to destabilize the family. When you destabilize the family, who, who's in charge when you don't have a leader of a family

54:17and you break it up, well, the state, of course, the whole idea of breaking apart the family. And I just talked about this on Circle of White Light Radio out of Ireland two days ago. The reason they want to destabilize the family is because it gives more power to the state. And the reason they wanted to give the women the vote. And in that matter, universal suffrage was because then you have people like women, like people who do not excuse me for the car outside. You have people who do not contribute sort of the drags of society, if you will, making decisions. There's a reason why in China, everyone is required to vote. Then, well, then the state goes, wow, everyone's voted. And they cater to the least common denominator. They cater to the people who vote based on their emotions, based on some emotional reaction. Hence, you have Barack Obama with the, yes, we can.

55:21Yes, we can. What? I didn't know. I voted for the man twice. I just, I look back and it's like, oh, he may be feel hopeful. That's not a reason. But they did that to harness everything and move it to the left. No matter what happens. And I think people are waking up to this. No matter if in the states, it's the Democrat or Republican or in the UK, it's whatever the conservative party versus labor party, nothing really changes. They'll throw you a bone. The conservative will get in there and say, oh, well, look at this. Look, what we're, but what if we conserved? We've conserved nothing. It's all been taken away. Ronald Reagan hailed as like a great conservative president in the United States. He, when he was governor of California in 1969, instituted no fault divorce. That was the first time that law was introduced in the United States. And it was by Ronald Reagan. He also did. And why? Because it, because it caters to the female vote. Because you can say, oh my goodness, you'll have to be able to get out of these abusive relationships without bringing

56:22it proof. I mean, you're just being abused or whatever. So it caters to the females. The other thing that caters to the females is, oh, we have to let the immigrants in. What are we going to do all those poor people? Look, we have whatever. And Ronald Reagan in California, he basically said all these illegal immigrants that were in California, millions said, okay, guess what? You're no longer illegal. In fact, your citizens and you can vote. Well, that caters to them. And it's no different than when immigration came. And people were coming in through Ellis Island and politicians started catering to the Irish or the Italians or whatever, except now we're catering to people from completely different cultures than what makes up the West. And the reason is because of politicians catering to women and their feelings and this toxic empathy. And that is pervasive. That is why. That is one reason. And there you go. It's power to

57:28the state. It's power to the state to do that. And what does the state want to do? Globalize everything, which is what you were getting at. Globalize everything. And that's why when you look at this, when you look back at COVID, you go, isn't it weird that the whole world was participating in this? Like, you think we have this government in that. And I'm really getting a conspiracy theory territory. But if you open your eyes and you actually look at it, you go, it's weird that we have all these different countries supposedly. But you're not really really like the same people are pulling every like who the heck elected the world economic forum. Okay, Erin. Absolutely brilliant, because this is this is a key area. Yes, if we've got policies, the same policies occurring at the same time, even in different countries spread across the world, then it's obvious that somewhere in a warm, comfortable room, we've got people,

58:32people making the policy. And it's also easy to see now that women are in the ascendancy in many, many powerful political positions and corporate positions. It's been really noticeable over the last say 10 years, women coming into very powerful political positions, Ursula von Delayen, for example, in the European Union. But we've also got prime ministers of European companies. We've also now got many defense ministers who are females. And I find this very, very interesting because I'm maybe one day in my life, I will meet one of these women. But today, I've never met a woman who got particularly excited about matters pertaining to defense or ships or tanks or aircraft.

59:32It's sort of not their scene. And yet, standing very impeccably with the men, usually in a trouser suit, are these now very powerful women who are appearing in these very, very powerful positions. But it's not only politics because they're cropping up in a lot of the powerful, non-government organizations. And they're certainly popping up in the very, very powerful, global corporates. So it's very interesting to see that the recruitment base of women has increased. Some of that's got to be due to what the law is telling companies to do. But I listen to a lady called Helen Andrews. Yes, I did show on her. Oh, overcoming, overcoming, yeah, overcoming the feminization of culture. Yes. And what she was saying is pay attention to this. And again,

1:00:38you told me if I'm wrong on this, but I think she said that in America, you'd now got a majority of women in law as a profession. Yes. And overwhelming majority of women as veterinarians. Yes. Okay, you could say, well, that's just animals, but nevertheless, it's there. And judges. Yes. And so she, as a woman, is particularly flagging up that we're seeing a major change in society and culture, not for the better as a result of women increasingly coming into these very powerful positions. Right. Think of this whole place. This whole, the West, is the ship, is the metal box where the men are organized. They're in their hierarchy. They're defending the ship. They're, you know, making sure the ship functions, right? If you take that microcosm,

1:01:39look at it as a microcosm of the world. And then you add the women to the group of men that stabilize the West and build the West and stabilize it. And now you've got the women sort of put in those positions. It corrupts everything. And I love that you said that well, women aren't interested in like ships and defense and etc. Exactly. We're interested in power. That's what we're interested in. And I actually learned this from Pearl Davis, as you said, per capita over history, per capita. And again, I'm talking about the West, per capita of rulers, women start wars more. Yet we don't fight them. But guess what? We're more emotional and we're more reactive. And a lot of women don't want to hear that. But here's what I will say. Yes, we're more emotional. We're more reactive. We're designed that way. We only think it's a bad thing because we're comparing it to men and what their jobs are, right? You can't be emotional and

1:02:42reactive on the battlefield. You can't make those decisions. You have to base it on logic and facts and reason. When you're dealing with babies, you have to be like, babies cry. I have an emotion about that. I'm going to act. Yes, of course, a man would say, well, you know, the baby needs to be fed but that's not how we operate. We go child. I understand their emotions. I understand this whole dynamic because I am supposed to be taken care of like small children. And so we take what our actual gifts and we pervert them by unleashing them onto the world, having us accept all the immigrants because that's the kind thing to do, et cetera. But again, that is a complete perversion of what that's truly intended for. I just want to put in my analogy for this. My analogy of why I don't think we're the best suited for politics, for defense, et cetera. And that

1:03:48is a lifeboat. Everybody can remember the movie Titanic, right? 1997 movie. And there's lifeboats. And it can only see certain number of people. I don't remember the number of people. We'll say eight people, right? Including the guy who's rowing and what have you. There's people in the water trying to climb a board trying to get in. There's women, obviously, women and children first, on the life raft saying, oh my god, he's going to drown. We have to let him on board. Oh, meanwhile, the guy who's rowing the boat takes his ore, smacks the dude on the head who's trying to climb in. And the women go, could you do such a thing? Well, if that guy climbs up into the life raft, we're all going to die. If I make sure he can't do that, then those of us here will live. And I think that is a microcosm of what is going on in the West as a whole in their grunts are flooding in and whatever

1:04:50you may feel of other looking for a better life or they're actually good people. Doesn't matter, doesn't matter how good the person is who's trying to claw their way onto the life raft, it can only see so many people. You can't let him aboard. But the women don't understand that because of toxic empathy. And that's why that's how we vote. That's how we act when we are outside of our family, great, you know, extended family and small community. We do not need to take that and those skills and project them politically across the world. Then you have Angela Merkel. That's just let everyone in. Yes, another very interesting lady. Let me just throw this one in while it pops into my mind. But you're talking about the emotional base in women's thinking. Very interestingly, a few days ago, Kia Starma Prime Minister here in UK announced that the Labour Party was going to be taking a more emotional stance in its politics and the training

1:05:58reframing, I will say, of members of Parliament. There was going to be special education and training systems set up inside the Labour Party in order to give a more emotional flavour to their politics and allow their own MPs to engage better with their communities. And the emotion, the word emotion emotional perhaps only occurred three or four times in the article. But to me, it jumped out of the page because I thought, oh, this is more of the destruction of a stable organised society. Just because I suspect we've now done enough to really fire up some people listening to this chat, can we just talk about men? To me, it's also clear that men, well not only

1:07:00a men under attack, but we've seen a big change in boys and men in my lifetime. There's no question of this. And of course, the easy thing for me to talk about is the feminisation of men. And that can be as easy as saying, well, just have a look at adverts for clothes for men now, increasingly, the sort of clothes that are being pushed forward to men are more and more effeminate. In the way they look. Also, we've got cosmetic products. We've also got men being pushed towards a lot more female caring, emotional roles. And in UK at least, and I think this is really dangerous. It's been announced in the last month that in order to follow the promotes the government's latest policy to tackle crime against women, particularly crimes against

1:08:05women, boys, teenage boys are now going to get special classes to do with relationships with women. And in my head, what this is going to do is furthering grain in these males that they've got to be absolutely careful around women, what they say, what they do, touching, whatever. So these young boys are going to take on the burden of crimes against women out in society. And I think this is very, very bad. And what they're not going to tell the boys, of course, is that overwhelmingly men are at greater risk of being attacked on the streets than women, or be it out of the women's percentage of crimes against them, a greater percentage or to do with sexual attacks. But nobody wants to talk about the fact you're actually less safe

1:09:10on the streets as a man than you are a woman. Right. Because what happens to men doesn't matter. Right. But Aaron, just talk a little bit about how you have seen men change, because early on in in our discussion, you did, you just did just touch on men leading in a family relationship. Right. What do you mean by that? And why, why are you talking about that? What I mean by that, and I can harken back to my father being in the merchant marines. And I understand that there's only one captain of the ship. There's not two captains. When you go on a plane, there's only one captain of the ship. His word is the final word. If even you have a copilot, there's stuff that goes on. Heavy turbulence. What have you? The captain is the captain. You can't be like, well, I don't know copilot. Well, what do you have to say? Well, well,

1:10:10let's discuss. And then whoever we think, like who who's who chooses? So a family dynamic is no different. The father should be the one who has the final say about all things for the family. That means, are we going to move? That's up to dad. All of those things. It's up to dad. The final say is up to him. Now, women hear that. And they think that this is an invitation for men to be tyrants. The idea that we hear that way is based on the thinking that man, bad. That's what is taught. If we give men that power, they're just going to be tyrants, they're just going to chain us to the kitchen, etc. When in reality, that never has happened in the West. That's just not who the men of Christendom are. It's just not who you are. It's not what you

1:11:14want. The men of Christendom, when I say that, that's the men of the West. They listen to their wives. Their wives happiness greatly matters to them. They actually put it above their own. They will sacrifice themselves for their own family. So because they also have that responsibility, where if the roof blows off the man's, you're going to fix it. If the intruder comes, the man did with all that responsibility, he should, as another content creator Andrew Wilson says, he should get the big piece of chicken. He just should. And you know, I feel like as a woman, if you love your husband, you want him to have the big piece of chicken because you value him that much. It doesn't mean that you devalue yourself, whatever. So the man leading means he has the final say. And the woman is sort of the manager underneath all that. Of course, it can be little decisions in such that

1:12:15she's in charge of it. It's all under the framework that he creates much like a captain, first mate, second mate, crew. And it's efficient. And you're, you're less likely to, I don't know what the problems are in a ship, but hey, you're less likely to sink. Right. So Aaron, what would you say to a woman who came back on that and said, Oh, well, that might have been true in the 1950s. But we're now in the world. We are, we've got all the technology to make lives easier. So women don't need to put themselves in this type of relationship. They can be in a, they can be in a partnership where where the man and woman are completely equal. They're both educated the same. They're both working professional jobs. So it's just a partnership. What would you say to a woman that put that argument back? It says that. I'm glad you said that I would say, first of all, several things to say, I would say just because you can, it doesn't mean you should.

1:13:19I would also say, All right. So that was the case in 1950. Let's look at female happiness between 1950 and today. They'll say, Oh, well, they were on pills back then. I'm sorry. I think we all know how much more women drink, how much more they, and I don't mean drink to socialize. I mean, like let's have a bottle of wine at night because it's difficult to cope with having this full-time job and all the rest of it. They're not happy. Women are not happy. And the women who have the traditional roles, those marriages last longer, the comeback to that would be, Oh, well, those women don't have as much options, bullcrap. They can get divorced, take half the man's stuff and the kids, and possibly if there isn't that much money, the government will pay for us. The government pays for us. I live in government housing. Do you know who's all around here? This is basically should be called housing for single mothers. You know, it just, you can say, well, we live in these

1:14:24times. And that argument is so empty because it's like, yeah, we live in these times and they're much worse. Perhaps we should look back and say, we made some wrong decisions. They'll say, well, we live in these times. Well, I'm sorry, but right is right and wrong is wrong. And it's still wrong. And it still doesn't work. And you can have all the technology in the world. All that does is make it, it's fake. It's all fake. Now, this is real. You know, it's all propped up. And women will think, well, we can do everything a man can do. And you said about back in the military, okay, well, I don't know if you've ever lifted an AK 47, but I have. It is really, really heavy. I've got a strong upper body from working with horses. And I was struggling just to hold it. I cannot imagine running with it and all the ammunition that you'd have to run with and your pack. We can't do that. We can't do these other jobs. So the idea that, oh, well, we can do everything a man can

1:15:24do. Most of our jobs are made up HR, paper pushing. I feel like these jobs were sort of invented. So women can say, oh, I'm just as equal and just as equal in education. Well, yeah, the education is suited for us. What does that even mean? It doesn't mean anything anymore. So that's what I would say. Thank you for that. I have an American mother. So sometimes my American mother comes out and sometimes my British father is here. And I'm very, you know, sort of, I'd say that. I'd say that's a pretty good combination. Dangerous one. As you were saying that about sort of job titles and things. When we were dealing with people in my early military days and for corporate companies, it was all personnel. You might have a personnel officer. And then that became human resources. I don't know whether that expression was used in America. So we went from personnel to human

1:16:28resources. Yes, we had the same. Yes. And now I read this last week in the British military. I think it was in the Henri F. You have a lady who's in the top position of an air station. And her professional career in the military has been as a people officer. So that sounds very 1984. It does tell you how to be a person and what that means. And you're very naughty. Let me go and tell the boys like they're five years old in kindergarten. Oh, yeah. Now I touched on what was going wrong with with males. And I talked about the feminine feminization of males. The other thing, of course, that's happening increasingly in Western societies is the males who are gaming. Now the trouble with online games

1:17:30is there are some pretty good ones. And yet they've got a big pull power. But nevertheless, they are games. And we've now got males, the head of the household, who should be doing a variety of things as a male within that household are sat in a chair with a can of beer or a cup of tea. And they are gaming for hours. So those males, in my opinion, are also being pulled out of their roles. Yes. Or some of them are. Some can balance it and have got it in check. But some are out of control. And so the women in the relationship are getting frustrated because the man in the relationship is not acting as a male. They're as an adult male. They're acting as a child playing video games. That's interesting. Right before you sent me the link for I am telling the truth,

1:18:30it's crazy. Right before you sent me the link to join this interview, I was talking to my best friend. She happens to be in her 20s. So she's Gen Z. And we were talking about this very dynamic about video games and how it changed from generations because they kind of came out with Gen X and then millennials kind of turned it into this is an okay hobby. Like the younger millennials, the people who are sort of in their 30s now, they change it to gaming. And as if this is a normal hobby. Whereas for my generation, it was sort of looked down upon like, oh, you just play video games, right? So yes, I would say it has now become acceptable in society that this is gaming is a hobby. Now it's discussing with my friend because she says, you know, her husband only plays a couple nights a week. And I said, you are very lucky because a lot of these women, they're dealing with husbands who play chronically like every waking minute. And we were discussing

1:19:33why that might be. And I said, I think one reason your husband does not is because of the wife he has. He, like when they go on vacation, for example, she said, she has friends who the husbands bring their gaming stuff along with them on vacation. So he literally just learned that right before you and I started talking and I couldn't believe it. And she said, her husband doesn't do that. And I said, well, he has such a pleasant experience on vacation. She thinks about, well, what are you like? He likes to sleep in. She gets up in the morning. So they get an Airbnb. So when he's sleeping, she has the pool and the shops. And then when she goes to bed early, he has the same. And she made the point to let's let's structure our vacations this way. So you have more fun. I say that to say that I don't think that's the experience in a lot of households. I think vacation is this is what we're going to do.

1:20:35And this is how you're going to be. And now while I agree that it is out of control and that it is gaming is done far too much, I think that a big reason for it is the escapism. And if you're playing, for example, Call of Duty, which is a giant, like, you know, war game or what have you, you know, what you can be when you play Call of Duty, you can be a man. You're not being told that your natural tendencies are wrong and that you need to be more emotional or you need to be feminized. Because the whole thing, including what Kierf Starmer is saying about, we're going to be more emotional, whatever, it's another way of saying, hey, men, there's something very wrong with you because, and the thing they're not saying is because you're not more like women. And I think when you try to make women throughout the 20th century, more like men, compete like men, etc. And you start to go, oh, that really can't happen. Well, then you have to feminize the men

1:21:44because you can't bring the women to where the men are. So you have to bring the men to where the women are. And then you have indeed destroyed the concept of that there is a man and a woman. And that's what I think the whole trans thing is about because now there's no such thing. It's a spectrum blah, blah, blah. And isn't it interesting that feminism having driven the things it has for women has now pushed women into a society where they have to accept men coming into their toilets and changing rooms. Yeah, I shouldn't be as as amused by that as I am. Well, we're allowed to smile because this this is a serious discussion, but the smiling is good because it keeps morale up. So we're not laughing at people too. Yes, I think I have a secret theory that the reason why British people have such a good sense of humor

1:22:49and sort of can laugh through difficult times is because of what they went through in World War Two and sort of like waiting to be bombed. Like, what are you going to do? You're going to have a you have to have a bit of a laugh. You have to. And anyway, I think that was passed down to me from my grandparents, et cetera. So yes, I absolutely have the habit of laughing at probably what people would say in inappropriate time. But yeah, you're going to laugh. You're going to cry. But yes, the fact that you know, like we saw on the Olympics women just getting knocked out by a man. Yes, I think that's funny. I do because you know what you cut a done lady. You could have stood up for all the rest of the women in the competition and in the world and said, I'm not going to fight you. Yeah, I'm not where the women that said, I'm not going to swim. When that man, whatever his name is, I can't remember some swimmer in the United States decided he was a girl. Basically, I think

1:23:51because he couldn't compete with the man, but either way. And then it became well, he's taking opportunity away from women. Why don't you take the opportunity away from him to compete against you by shutting down the competition and not showing up and what's going to happen? They're going to have to listen to you. But women didn't do that. They just said, I want to get mine. I don't care about these other women. The idea of a sisterhood is baloney. We do not stand up for one another. We do not, we don't do that. If we did, there wouldn't be any trans men in sports. It wouldn't be any trans men in bathrooms. We need to stop blaming trans men for that or men for that and start looking to ourselves. It's us. We have not stood up against it. In fact, we have actually propagated the types of policies and the types of mentalities emotion. Oh, he has to identify as his true self and lie. He might have his feelings hurt. That's our mentality. That's not the men's mentality. Yeah.

1:24:52So we've basically invited them into our spaces. So I'm not going to be sad when any of that happens because it's by our own choice. Yeah. Well, it is. But you went in the ring. Aaron, it is producing a pushback. So maybe there's a good and unexpected result for the people who implemented the policy. I am watching time, but just two things and both of them are on the heavy side. But if we consider women in modern society, there's two issues which I think are causing a lot of pain for women. One of them, of course, is abortion and very emotive subject for a lot of people. But the reality is we now live in a political sphere where young girls are going to be taught. It's our being taught. It's okay to kill your baby.

1:25:53And we also know that many women who've gone through the procedure have been absolutely distraught at it. And to the extent they don't even want to talk about it. So it was traumatizing for them. But we are seeing particularly in the West governments pushing the policy that abortion is completely normal and acceptable. And if it happens to you, just go and do it and get rid of the child. And of course, the the time of termination is getting later and later. So I've used it. I use the word baby, not fetus, but we're now seeing the push towards what is essentially a child. Feedus only means small child and Latin. Okay. So we're calling it child no matter what, but the reason they want to save fetus is because it's dehumanizing. It's a dehumanization. And

1:26:53do you know who likes dehumanization? Communists. And it dehumanizes by saying, yeah, this thing isn't a life. It's a clump of cells. Well, we're all clumps of cells. Anyway, it's not a life. Well, we also have the rise of euthanasia, isn't that funny? But at the same time, because you're not a life anymore, you don't matter. Who's telling us who doesn't matter and who's disposable? It's coming from the state through propaganda. And not only are women being told that, oh, it's your absolute right, we're being told that it's a duty, a duty to kill our babies and it's empowering. It's a duty because you wouldn't want to bring the child up in poverty. Yes, you wouldn't want to bring the child into the world and then put it up for adoption because the foster care system is so broken. There's a waiting list in America for infants. These infants don't go into a

1:27:54broken foster system, which by the way, even if it was broken, so does that mean you can just kill it? Should we just go around killing poor people? Well, yeah, that's how the state would like it to progress. It's the beginning of an introduction to an ideology that says, well, let's just kill all these people who are not valuable. It's fine. It dehumanizes. And 1.3 billion babies have been murdered. More babies have been murdered than all the men fought in all the wars. Again, we're using the policy in America. We're seeing it in UK. We're seeing it throughout the European Union, Western Europe, so clearly it's coordinated. The other one is IVF. An interestingly three days ago, I think the BBC had a particularly, I'm going to describe it as pernicious article, which was describing a woman who was having her second child by IVF.

1:28:57She did not know who the father was. Same father for both babies, but she had no idea who the father was. And the whole article was promoting her successful life as a mother now bringing up two children from IVF and the clear message through very carefully crafted text was, well, I don't need a man. I have, or a father, I have got what I want. So it wasn't even about I want to bring children into the world. We, we, it was simply I. And I read it. I read it three times actually. And I felt that it was a vicious article by the BBC clearly trying to say to young girls, well, don't worry about your prime fertile period because you can freeze your eggs. Technology

1:30:00will save the day and you can successfully live as a single mother. And that would even be preferable because then you can have everything you want and then you don't have to answer to a man and you don't have to have custody battles because he's out of the picture. And he cares about all those embryos that needed to be created in order for you to have two successful babies. It's fine. They're not people. They're not human flush them down the toilet. Absolutely. The man doesn't matter. The father's insignificant. Absolutely. It's a dehumanization of men, a devaluing of men that has been going on for at least the past 100 years, maybe longer when you just send men off to fight bankers, wars, and they die in the millions. You're already devaluing them. We're told in all these wars. Oh, this is for us. This is for our freedom. And we could be speaking German now. What have you? And it's like, okay, I guess just kill all the men. And in silly and oddly, it's like, what's kill all the men and christen them for that? But it's a devaluing of men and it's saying,

1:31:04you don't need there to be a man in the household. They're just interchangeable anyway. Also, what it and this has already been a problem and it's from celebrating single mothers and devaluing fathers. It is, well, and this comes from having birth control. Actually, being able to have sex without knowing that a child could become of it, they say, oh, I want children. Okay, but that's very different than deciding to be a mother, wanting children as some accessory for your amusement or validation, because now you're a mother, so you're somehow in some circles higher up. You can now speak on things, et cetera, having children does not make you a mother. It doesn't. And we talked about gaming. All right, ladies, you could talk about gaming. When you start, I don't know,

1:32:08restricting your scrolling on your phone, posting on your phone. No one talks about that, but we're going to condemn the men for gaming. It seems like a different, you know, double standard. But yes, but yes, there's a very big difference between having children and being a mother, being a mother means reading to your children, teaching your children right from wrong, playing with your children, not putting them in front of a screen for cocoa melon nonsense for the babies. And like, I don't know, Miss Rachel is for the older kids like, no, you read to your children, you teach them how to read before they get to school. I knew my alphabet by two years old because I had a mother. These kids can't do handwriting. Your mother works with you on that. Not the teachers. They've put everything in the, this is what you learned at school. You learned at school? No, your mother teaches that, but we don't have mothers. Erin, this is my story just before I sent you the email. I came across, I can't remember what

1:33:14the publication was, but I'm pretty sure it was American. It might have been Canadian. And the main type of thrust of the articles that generation Z, we're going to school, unable to read and write properly. So, you know, there you are. That was one of the things I saw. Now, I'd like to end by just asking you a couple of things. You, you are a woman, you are now pretty well known over the internet. When speaking out on feminism and the dangers of feminism for women, I am sure that you've experienced a backlash of this. And there's one of the reasons that, in my opinion, as a man, I'm going to, I'm going to label you as gutsy. But what has the result been of you as a woman stepping forward and saying, come on, ladies, you are being drawn into something which is dangerous and dark.

1:34:17Are you getting people who are having their eyes opened or is the, you know, is the pushback by the feminist, you know, sort of too powerful? How are you finding things? It's interesting because there's pushback. But there's no argument. They can't argue, like they can't make an argument against it. They can call me a pick me, which means I'm just saying this because I want men to like me. How a scandalist that you would ever want men to like you as a person. But they'll call me a pick me. They'll say I'm a misogynist. I just hate women. Whatever. It's personal insults, but they can't make an argument against what I'm saying. They can't. They really can't. When it comes down to the facts, to the statistics, to logic, their arguments do not stand. There are women. I have some women who watch my show, a few that I know of because they've been in the chat. And they'll say,

1:35:20you know, things like, well, I'll be on here for a little bit, but I need to make my husband dinner. And they are celebrating the act of serving their husband. And they find that in a platform like mine, they can freely share that because it is not usually welcome just, you know, amongst other women, as you have said, what I have found is that so far. I have had the most luck with women in real life. I only open up to, you know, certain people in real life about what I do. But what I have found is that when I begin to explain, when I begin to say the hardships that men face say in family court, right, the rate of suicide, the dangerous jobs, you see their wheels turning and they go, huh, because they've never thought about that before because how could

1:36:20they have. And when I've said, for example, to my physical therapist, now that is a profession. And I love her. And I'm thankful that she does what she does. But I'm conflicted because she has children, right? And I'm a very big supporter of homeschool. You can't do that with a big career. But when I said to her what I do, and I said, I, I say to these women, I imagine that it was better during the sort of little house on the prairie days. That was a television show in the United States, where it's basically just like a farm with a family, the grow your food, your hunter food, you travel in a wagon, everybody's together, extended family, et cetera. And that wasn't that long ago. And as soon as I say that, their eyes light up, no matter if what job they have, what walk of life in my hairdresser, my physical therapist, I'll paint that picture

1:37:21to them and their eyes light up. And they agree with me that it would be so much better if that were our reality. And I they're not just agreeing with me because I'm there. I know I can read women like it's just one of my super talents. And it's almost a curse. But as part of how I can do my show is by translating what the women are saying and what their motivation is. And I know that they almost breathe a sigh of relief at that idea. Now I am in the south, which helps. I'm not in New York City. I'm not in London, do you know what I mean? But it tells me a lot about who we really are and how open we actually are to the idea of it. Because my thing is that as a physical therapist, she should be able to do this in her home with her own children there. And contrary to popular belief about well, if you're, you know, traditional,

1:38:23then it's just you at home with your kids. No, we were with our sisters, which we had many, because we had big families. We were with our sisters. We were with our mothers. We wouldn't have been that much older than us because we would have been getting married young. So generations would be 20 years, right? So you'd have your mother, your grandmother, your aunts, your sisters, and all the kids. And you're kind of playing a zone defense. I know y'all don't really have basketball there. But you're like, all right, these are my kids I'm watching right now. These are these kids I'm watching right now. And the women could do what they were talented at. Maybe somebody's over here growing herbs. Maybe somebody's over here. See what I'm saying? And we just don't have that point of reference. They don't want us to. They want us to think that a traditional home is just, oh, I'd be so bored. Like you'll hear women say, oh, I couldn't do it. I'd be so bored. I have to get out of the house. That's not true. If you had your mother, your sisters, et cetera, all there. And ideally, the men would also be around. Do you know what I mean?

1:39:24It wouldn't be off at some separate job. So when you, when I, I've learned that when I'm talking to a woman in order to get them to see what I'm actually saying, I'm not blaming women. I'm not. I'm saying we've been pawns. We've been fooled. And it hasn't been better for us. And as soon as I paint that picture for them, they're like, yeah, you're right. And the, and the communists, they talked about useful idiots. And I'm starting to go, maybe that's a lot of us. Because we sure can be swayed. And it seems to always make the state more powerful and the family less powerful. So who are these useful idiots we're talking about here? It's not looking good for us. So we need to be discerning. And I will say that a clear biblical message is that there

1:40:33is a inherent order. Yes. Absolutely. And what, what do you suggest that? Well, yes. I'm inviting you to give that biblical message about the order of. Sure. God instituted a natural order. As soon as creation occurred, it is God, man, woman, child. And evil people, and I think a lot more people are awake to the fact that evil exists and evil is real. Evil people, fueled by Satan himself because he's real. They love nothing more than to destroy and pervert God's natural order. Making him invisible. Let's replace him and put science in his place. Let's replace him with government, right? Let's, let's teach everybody that a, you know, Darwinism and what have you?

1:41:36And these things are brand new ideas. Science is a whole different religion. And that removes God. Now, let's take men and women and let's say they're equal. They're equal. Oh, no, just kidding. They're not equal. They're the same. They're interchangeable. And by the way, that was something that early feminists in the United States were already saying. They, they, they, they formed cults. And they were like, no, there's no such thing as men and women as those such thing as marriage, just free love, literally free love. And, you know, die 1800s. People don't know about that. They think it's all new. It's not new. So yes, they pervert all that, not only that. Look at how much the children run the household. Nobody has bedtime. Yeah. Yeah. Nobody has, you know, you have to eat your carrots first. No, it's chicken nuggets and mac and cheese. Because Johnny won't eat anything else. We're seeing an attack on women and on men, non relationships and on society.

1:42:40And it is very interesting that that attack is clearly designed to break down. Yes. Like God given order. Absolutely. It absolutely is. It absolutely is. There's so much perversion of God's natural order. And I'm just saying, like these evil, evil people who want to hide God and basically run the world, is it any wonder that we're all discovering the, the abundance of abuse against children, I will say, because I am on YouTube, right? So I'm trained not to say certain things, but we'll say Epstein, right? And worse and worse. And that shouldn't be a surprise to anybody because the corruption of innocence is another thing that these, that evil

1:43:46loves is destroying God's order. Also, I will say, destroying God's order, but Satan has been jealous of man since the very beginning. So it's no wonder that this is an attack on men. Aaron, what a brilliant place to finish. And I always like to add that you can't fight what you can't see and you can't understand. So if people have come through this and thinking, my goodness, this is very heavy stuff. Yes, it is, but you're an adult and you need to know. And if you know what's happening to you and why it's happening and how it's been done, you can't actually fight back, not least by the simple, the simple action of saying no as often as possible to these policies, but yeah. Aaron, absolutely fantastic. A lot more I could ask you and many more rabbit holes we could go down, but I want to say thank you very much for joining me.

1:44:49It's been utterly brilliant. And I do think you're a gutsy woman because as I have discovered speaking out on the internet, it is amazing what comes back in. Yes, I do get lovely emails from people and the very nice letters, but people who don't like what you say are usually pretty tough at saying it. The truth is so powerful. And when you know you are speaking the truth, that is fuel in and of itself. I don't, I have this whole, I don't know how to call it, but I have this whole fortitude in me because I know I am speaking the truth. God is truth. And so nothing can come against that. Even if they were to charge my door and say we're coming to get you and we're going to come arrest you. That's fine. You know, it's fine. You have to be

1:45:50willing to believe in what you say to the point that you would literally die for it. And you have to make that choice long before you ever start speaking. I go by a quote, it was by an early American that I just cannot think of the name, but he said it might have been Jefferson. Whatever anguish of spirit it may cause, I am willing to know the whole truth. And that's a commitment you need to make. And if this conversation is heavy or too much, then you're not there. You're avoiding your anguish of spirit. Yeah. And you have to realize that's a choice that you're making. Brilliant. Erin, thank you very, very, very much. Great, great place to end on. I'll say to you, if you fancy having a round two at some stage, leave a little bit of time, I'd love to do it. I'll hold this up as a little bit of a teaser because again, this is some of the research I've got that I decided. I don't know what you can see that

1:46:51all on camera, but it's. Which is feminism and oh my goodness, which is feminism and the fall of the West. And the author is called Edward Edward Dutton, D-U-W-T-O-N. He's a, let me just put my glasses down, let me just get my glasses. He's professor of evolutionary psychology, the Azbiro University in Poland, an author of making sense of race. Now, I've had this book for a while and one of my failings is that I get books. I do start to read them. Then another book comes in and I get distracted. So when I was just doing a little bit of preparation for this discussion, this book came to my eye and I started to read bits. I will read this book again properly because it is fascinating. It's quite challenging in what

1:47:56it's describing and also you've got to get into why the man is describing these various things. But if I read this book again, when I've done that, I'd love to have another chat with you. Oh, yes, please. Absolutely, yes, please. That would be great. Yes, I have another channel on YouTube called Literary Archaeology and we dig into old literature and new literature and I am putting this book on the list immediately. Yes, you can go back and if you think you know what fairy tales are and you think you know why they talked about witches, you probably don't. Right now I know you've spoken about fairy tales because I've listened to some of that. I did find it very, very interesting. I had to start a whole new channel for it. Yeah, I know it's great and I can easily bring up some other books as well that you might find of interest. Oh, absolutely. We have to do this again. We have to.

1:48:57They're in absolutely fantastic discussion. Really enjoyed it. I'm so glad I took the initiative of sending you an email and thank you for joining me. Thank you so much for having me. It was a fabulous discussion and I'm also grateful you reached out.