
Generative AI, Section 230 and Liability: Assessing the Questions
About this episode
In this episode of the podcast, we hear three perspectives on generative AI systems and the extent to which their makers may be exposed to potential liability. I spoke to three experts, each with their own views on questions such as whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act-- which has provided broad immunity to internet platforms that host third party content-- will apply to systems like ChatGPT.
Guests, in order of appearance, include:
- Jess Miers, legal advocacy counsel at the Chamber of Progress, an industry coalition whose partners include Meta, Apple, Google, Amazon, and others;
- James Grimmelmann, a law professor at Cornell with appointments at Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School;
- Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California Berkeley with a joint appointment in the computer and information science departments.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Tech Policy Press Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Tech Policy Press Podcast

AI Governance Reaches Crisis Point Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Across the US, School Districts Wrestle With Classroom AI Policy
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Rep. Zoe Lofgren on FISA, Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Virginia Eyes AI Chatbot Rules as Observable Risks Warrant Action
The Tech Policy Press Podcast