Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 31, 20261:28

Fake Case Cited in Raleigh Shooting Lawsuit

About this episode

New court filing in Raleigh mass shooting lawsuit accuses plaintiffs lawyers of citing a fake case, raising questions about discovery and accountability.

Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.

Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]

This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].

View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/d77c7d71fcc0ad8c

Get every episode summarized

Each time Durham News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

16 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Fake Case Cited in Raleigh Shooting Lawsuit

Durham News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

0:00
1:28

Full transcript

Durham News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!Fake Case Cited in Raleigh Shooting Lawsuit. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

It's March 31st. Welcome to Durham News Today, powered by AI. I'm Cory with the story. A new court filing in a civil lawsuit over the Raleigh mass shooting is calling out the plaintiff's lawyers for citing a fake court case. The suit, filed back in October 2024, blames the Neighborhood Association, property managers, the shooter's parents, and security for, not stopping 15-year-old Austin Thompson before he opened fire. Thompson killed five people, including his brother, and wounded two others on October 13th, 2022. He got life without parole after pleading guilty. The victim's families and survivors are suing, saying everyone knew he was trouble in the Headingham area. Now defendants like the property firm HRW say, the plaintiffs are dodging discovery by hiding info and using bogus legal sites. Their March 23rd motion points to a non-existent North Carolina case. Coons versus Thomas, plus irrelevant ones from divorce files or South. Carolina. Lawyers claim plaintiffs won't name folks who flag Thompson's issues,

skip emails for months, and even had victims testify they never reviewed. Their own responses or check phones and diaries. After 10 months, responses are still thin, leaving everyone guessing what's being held back. Judges could force better answers and make plaintiffs pay fees if they side with defendants. No hearing date yet, but this twist keeps the fight over accountability rolling in the courts.

More episodes

More from Durham News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

View all episodes →