Episode 97 - Using Designated-Representative Depos When You Can't Depose An Apex Witness
About this episode
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a question he got from a lawyer whose corporate opponent refused to make the CEO available for deposition under the "apex doctrine." Garrity explains the advice he gave, which was to immediately notice a designated-representative deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). He also discusses the value of designated-representative depositions in arbitration, where - because of sharp restrictions on the number of depositions that can be taken - many witnesses will similarly be off-limits.
Get every episode summarized
Each time 10,000 Depositions Later Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from 10,000 Depositions Later Podcast
Episode 168: Examination Methods: The Pozner-Dodd Technique
10,000 Depositions Later Podcast
Episode 167 - Schedule-Proofing Your Depositions: Drafting Notices with Multiple...
10,000 Depositions Later Podcast
Episode 166 - Are You Audiorecording Your Depositions (Yet)?
10,000 Depositions Later Podcast
Episode 165: Stopping the "You Can Answer" Gatekeeping
10,000 Depositions Later Podcast