About this episode
This week Bruce puts Popper on trial. Specifically, through the lens of Michael Stevens’s book, The Knowledge Machine, which argues that science works because it follows the “iron law of explanation” where scientists must (at least in public) put aside philosophy, politics, and theology and only follow empirical evidence. Bruce asks, how compatible is this view with the epistemology of Karl Popper?And does Strevens' critique of Popper ring true? Or is it a strawman?
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Theory of Anything publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Theory of Anything
Episode 136: Michael Golding on Mental Illness and Universal Explainers
The Theory of Anything
Episode 135: Coercion and Critical Rationalism
The Theory of Anything
Episode 134: The Deutsch Slot Machine
The Theory of Anything
Episode 133: The Constitution of Knowledge
The Theory of Anything