
EP295: Surprising Insights About Measuring Primary Care Performance, With Rebecca Etz, PhD
About this episode
In Episode 295, Stacey Richter talks with Rebecca Etz, PhD, associate professor of family medicine and co-director of The Larry A. Green Center, about surprising insights into how primary care performance should actually be measured.
WHAT YOU'LL LEARN
✅ Why primary care remains one of the "best-kept secrets" of better health outcomes despite being chronically under-resourced
✅ Why measures that don't match the actual work of primary care are demoralizing to clinicians
✅ How financial incentives tied to the wrong targets distort what electronic medical records actually capture
✅ Why primary care is fundamentally a relational field, and what that means for measuring its value
✅ How primary care's performance measures held up during COVID, and where they broke down
WHY THIS MATTERS
Rebecca Etz and The Larry A. Green Center built 11 performance measures for primary care that are aligned across patients, clinicians, and payers — a rare feat, since PCPs already spend upwards of $40,000 a year of uncompensated time reconciling conflicting measurement standards. Etz argues that when the wrong things get measured, primary care's central strength — its relational, cognitive work of listening, thinking, and coordinating — gets systematically undervalued, and clinicians end up incentivized to paint an optimal picture in the record rather than actually deliver better care.
MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE
🔗 EP272, with Guy Culpepper, MD
=== LINKS ===
🔗 Show Notes with all mentioned links: Episode Page
🔗 Healthcare Industry Acronyms and Terms
✉️ Enjoy this podcast? Subscribe to the free weekly newsletter
🫙 Support the podcast with a small donation to the Tip Jar
📺 Subscribe to our YouTube channel
🎤 Listen on Apple Podcasts
🎤 Listen on Spotify
=== CONNECT WITH THE RHV TEAM ===
✭ LinkedIn ✭ Threads ✭ Bluesky ✭ X
00:00 Introduction.
03:41 Why is primary care one of the "best-kept secrets" of better health outcomes?
08:38 "Measures are a form of communication."
08:51 "If the way that you are assessed does not actually match up with the work you do or what you find to be important, it's pretty demoralizing."
11:41 "It is the outcome of health care, but it is not the same thing as quality."
16:31 "It creates a financial incentive to hit a target by any means necessary."
18:06 "We incentivize people to have good outcomes, and what that means is that electronic medical records are no longer simply databases that tell us what the health of the population is. They are databases that tell us what is the optimal picture that a clinician is able to paint of their patients."
21:07 "Primary care is a relational field."
22:14 "How does this relate to cost and utilization?"
26:43 "I think we all know that fee for service is death."
27:11 How has the measure of PCPs in the time of COVID held up?
27:32 What measure performs worse in the time of COVID?
28:17 "Primary care is the place that everybody goes."
31:16 EP270 with Dave Chase and EP272 with Guy Culpepper, MD.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Relentless Health Value publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Relentless Health Value

Private Equity in Primary Care: What the Data Actually Shows, With Yashaswini Si...
Relentless Health Value

Why Should a Plan Sponsor Care About the 340B Charity Program? With Shawn Gremmi...
Relentless Health Value

Mark Cuban and Cora Opsahl: The Truth About Pass-Through PBM Contracts and Gener...
Relentless Health Value

PMPM vs FFS—The Perverse Incentives Plan Sponsors Sometimes Miss, With Cristin D...
Relentless Health Value