Ep. 63 - The Limits of the Non-Aggression Principle | Interview Breakdown
About this episode
Are there exceptions to the so-called "non-aggression principle," which says that it is never justified to initiate force against a peaceful person?
In some circumstances, could it be justified to use physical force on somebody that doesn't consent? What qualifies as "consent" in the first place?
This is part 1 of my breakdown of Episode 50 - my conversation with Stephan Kinsella. In the future, I'll release a second breakdown of our conversation about argumentation ethics.
Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Get every episode summarized
Each time Patterson in Pursuit publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Patterson in Pursuit
Ep. 115 - Simon Dixon on Bitcoin, Epstein, and Whether BTC was Hijacked
Patterson in Pursuit
Pure Reason and the Divinity of Love
Patterson in Pursuit
Theoretical Pluralism and Chess [Narration]
Patterson in Pursuit
Things I Like about Christianity [Narration]
Patterson in Pursuit