About this episode
It's make or break time for the rule of law at the Supreme Court, as the Trump administration's plan to flood the streets with troops comes to One First Street. The Ninth Circuit says: YES. The Seventh Circuit says: NO. Meanwhile in Virginia, Trump's insurance lawyer Lindsey Halligan is LARPing as US Attorney so she can prosecute his nemesis James Comey. Which motion to dismiss will put this dumb case out of its misery? Selective and vindictive prosecution? Halligan's unlawful appointment? Literal truth of the supposed false statements? And for bonus subscribers: ANTIFA is the new RICO.
Links:
US v. Comey
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459121/united-states-v-comey/
US v. Giraud [Seventh Circuit Docket]
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71195676/united-states-v-julien-giraud-jr/
Trump v. Illinois [SCOTUS DOCKET]
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25a443.html
Oregon v. Trump [Ninth Circuit Docket]
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71554902/state-of-oregon-et-al-v-trump-et-al/
US v. Arnold (Hill)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71664415/united-states-v-arnold/?order_by=desc
Show Links:
https://www.lawandchaospod.com/
BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod
Threads: @LawAndChaosPod
Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod
Get every episode summarized
Each time Law and Chaos publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
