Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 25, 20261:38

Economists Oppose Fuel Tax Cut: Better Long-Term Support

About this episode

Economists in Australia oppose cutting fuel excise tax amidst shortages and rising prices. A tax cut could exacerbate the situation by increasing demand when supplies are scarce. The Albanese government has ruled out the proposal, while the opposition remains silent. Higher fuel prices are already prompting drivers to reduce usage, which helps conserve limited stocks without government purchase limits. Critics argue that a tax cut would disproportionately benefit wealthier households, driving up inflation. Previous attempts to cut the excise, such as in 2022, primarily benefited high earners. Economists propose redirecting the tax revenue to direct aid for those most affected, emphasizing the need for long-term support over short-term fixes.

Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.

Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]

This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].

View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/f11428edbf24e8bf

Get every episode summarized

Each time Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Transcript ready

18 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Economists Oppose Fuel Tax Cut: Better Long-Term Support

Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

0:00
1:38

Full transcript

Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!Economists Oppose Fuel Tax Cut: Better Long-Term Support. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Economists are pushing back hard against calls to cut Australia's fuel-exise tax on petrol and diesel. With shortages hitting hard and prices climbing, figures like mining billionaire Gina Reinhardt, Tasmania's premiere, and opposition leaders in new. South Wales and Victoria want the federal government to slash the tax for quick relief. The experts say it would just make things worse by boosting demand when supplies are tight. The Albany's government isn't biting, with treasurer Jim Chalmers ruling it out. Federal liberals and nationals have stayed quiet so far, avoiding the pressure. Meanwhile, higher fuel prices are already forcing some drivers to cut back, which helps stretch limited stocks without government caps on purchases. Critics point out the downsides for everyday people. A tax cut would let better off households spend more freely driving up inflation in a country already battling high rates. Low income families feel price spikes the most, but wouldn't get targeted help from a broad cut. They drive less anyway.

Past efforts show the risks. Back in 2022, the previous government have the excise for six months after oil prices surged from Russia's Ukraine and Beijing. It cost nearly $1 billion a month, and mostly benefited high earners who guzzle more fuel. Instead, economists suggest redirecting that tax revenue to direct aid like boosting job-seeker payments or rental assistance for those hurting most. As the fuel crunch drags on, the debate highlights tough choices between short-term fixes and smarter long-term support. Local news, powered by AI. This is Sydney News Today.

More episodes

More from Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

View all episodes →