Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsDec 9, 20151:39:36pending

Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions? [Unedited]

About this episode

The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that: "No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Yet many state universities give substantial preferences to certain races in their admissions decisions. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court approved such preferences, but the case was close, and controversial, and the question will be back before the Supreme Court this term. One side may argue that these preferences level the playing field, remedy prior discrimination, and enhance diversity within the classroom, thus redeeming the true promise of equal protection. But the other may say that these preferences – in favor of some races, at the expense of others – are racial discrimination pure and simple, the precise evil that the Equal Protection Clause was intended to forbid.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates - [Unedited] publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions? [Unedited]

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates - [Unedited]

0:00
1:39:36

More episodes

More from Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates - [Unedited]

View all episodes →