
About this episode
For years, political scholars and pundits have claimed that primary elections are exacerbating polarization and with the 2022 midterm elections approaching this year has been no different. With many extremist candidates on both sides of the aisle, it certainly feels like this claim should be true, but does the political science back that up?
To find an answer we turn to Harvard political scientist James Snyder and his 2010 paper “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress”. The findings are surprising and may have some key insights for how we should think about primary elections in the U.S. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Not Another Politics Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Not Another Politics Podcast

Is the Median Justice Running the Supreme Court?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Apr 24, 20261:09:57failed

Why Does America Pay More For Infrastructure?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Mar 26, 202650:42failed

What Binary Questions Get Wrong About Voters
Not Another Politics Podcast
Mar 12, 202638:43failed

Do Dishonest People Self-Select Into Public Service?
Not Another Politics Podcast
Feb 19, 202652:58pending