Do Algorithms Make Sentencing Fairer?
About this episode
Around the country, states are employing algorithms to help reduce prison populations and predict recidivism. This week, we hear from a Wisconsin judge with serious reservations about the algorithm used in his state. Also: a deep dive into Virginia's risk-assessment algorithm and the surprising results of its implementation.
Guests:
Nicholas McNamara, judge on the circuit court of Dane County, Wisconsin.
Jennifer Doleac, associate professor of economics at Texas A&M and director of the Justice Tech Lab.
Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Meta Settled. Is it a "Reckoning?"
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
A.I. Enshittifies Everything (Still)
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Can the Midterms Withstand Prediction Markets?
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Are Flock Cameras Watching You?
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future