Defining the Science of Reading and SoR Research Standards
About this episode
If you threw a rock into the middle of a pond but that rock was not a rock, can you still be said to have thrown a rock? Likewise, can a standard be said to be a standard if it is not standardized?
We know that science is a good thing, and using science in reading instruction is a good thing. But what exactly is meant by the “science of reading”? What exactly is the Science of Reading? Is it a noun? Is it a verb? Or has it become an adjective or perhaps a metaphor used to indicate something else?
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Reading Instruction Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Reading Instruction Show
Quiet, Piggy: A Trumpian Response to Science of Reading Critics
The Reading Instruction Show
Recognizing Words, the Three-Cueing System, and Identifying Words
The Reading Instruction Show
How NAEP Created a Perpetual Reading Crisis
The Reading Instruction Show
Reading and the Information Processing Model: Why Penguins Continue to Mishear W...
The Reading Instruction Show