
Decoding Academia 33: The Great Müller-Lyer Debate from Fish Tanks to Eye Operations *Patreon Preview*
About this episode
Welcome to another enlightening episode of Decoding Academia. In this bonus preview of our highly secretive Patreon content, we are discussing a controversial paper by Dorsa Amir and Chaz Firestone that challenges the established notion of the Müller-Lyer illusion being a product of cultural environments.
Prepare yourself for some high-level discussions of the visual processes of guppy fish and bearded lizards, as well as the remarkable lengths that psychologists will go to in order to get people to complete their tests. Will our seasoned scholars unravel the illusion, or is this debate another eye-catching mirage? <wink, wink>
Sources
- (forthcoming) Amir, D., & Firestone, C. Is visual perception WEIRD? The Müller-Lyer illusion and the Cultural Byproduct Hypothesis. Psychological Review.
- Dorsa's summary thread on the paper
- Joe Henrich's critical thread on the paper
- Chaz's response to the Joe Henrich thread
- Paul Bloom's Substack articles on Nature vs. Nurture debates and clever experiments
Get every episode summarized
Each time Decoding the Gurus publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Decoding the Gurus

The Moral Dilemmas of AI with Michael Inzlicht
Decoding the Gurus

Ken Wilber: Spiralling Upwards through a Technicolor Cosmos
Decoding the Gurus

Gurometer: Teal Swan and Scott Galloway
Decoding the Gurus

Supplementary Material 46: Epstein Did Microtransactions, Grok Did Nothing Wrong...
Decoding the Gurus