About this episode
David Glasner is a UCLA-trained economist specializing in monetary theory and the history of economic thought. He has disagreed in print with Murphy's take on the famous Sraffa-Hayek debate. David first explains his general views and then comments on the debate.
- Bob's Paper, "A Problem With the Pure Time Preference Theory of Interest": Mises.org/HAP477a
- David's Paper "The Sraffa-Hayek Debate on the Natural Rate of Interest": Mises.org/HAP477b
For just $25, you can receive our December Bundle, including three essential reads:Tom DiLorenzo's Axis of Evil: America’s Three Worst Presidents, Per Bylund's How to Think About the Economy,and Murray Rothbard's What Has Government Done to Our Money?. Claim your bundle now at Mises.org/HumanAction24
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Human Action Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Human Action Podcast
Robert Aro on the Fed's Reverse Repo Trick
The Human Action Podcast
Luke Gromen on the Strait of Hormuz and Supply Chain Collapse
The Human Action Podcast
Bob Responds to Randall Wray on Sectoral Balances
The Human Action Podcast
Cantillon Effects and the Politics of Money Creation
The Human Action Podcast