Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentOct 14, 202410:05pending

Courts Grappling with Realities of Retaliatory Arrests

Cato Podcast

About this episode

What makes an arrest retaliatory and what evidence ought to be up for consideration when courts decide if an arrest was, in fact, a retaliation? Thanks in part to a clarifying decision from the Supreme Court earlier this year, courts now must grapple more seriously with that question. Patrick Jaicomo of the Institute for Justice offers his thoughts.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Cato Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Courts Grappling with Realities of Retaliatory Arrests

Cato Podcast

0:00
10:05

More episodes

More from Cato Podcast

View all episodes →